Is Blockchain Technology Suitable for Managing Personal Health Records? Mixed-Methods Study to Test Feasibility

Background There are many perspectives on the advantages of introducing blockchain in the medical field, but there are no published feasibility studies regarding the storage, propagation, and management of personal health records (PHRs) using blockchain technology. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of blockchains in the medical field in relation to transactions with and propagation of PHRs in a private blockchain. Methods We constructed a private blockchain network using Ethereum version 1.8.4 and conducted verification using the de-identified PHRs of 300 patients. The private blockchain network consisted of one hospital node and 300 patient nodes. In order to verify the effectiveness of blockchain-based PHR management, PHRs at a time were loaded in a transaction between the hospital and patient nodes and propagated to the whole network. We obtained and analyzed the time and gas required for data transaction and propagation on the blockchain network. For reproducibility, these processes were repeated 100 times. Results Of 300 patient records, 74 (24.7%) were not loaded in the private blockchain due to the data block size of the transaction block. The remaining 226 individual health records were classified into groups A (80 patients with outpatient visit data less than 1 year old), B (84 patients with outpatient data from between 1 and 3 years before data collection), and C (62 patients with outpatient data 3 to 5 years old). With respect to mean transaction time in the blockchain, C (128.7 seconds) had the shortest time, followed by A (132.2 seconds) and then B (159.0 seconds). The mean propagation times for groups A, B, and C were 1494.2 seconds, 2138.9 seconds, and 4111.4 seconds, respectively; mean file sizes were 5.6 KB, 18.6 KB, and 45.38 KB, respectively. The mean gas consumption values were 1,900,767; 4,224,341; and 4,112,784 for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Conclusions This study confirms that it is possible to exchange PHR data in a private blockchain network. However, to develop a blockchain-based PHR platform that can be used in practice, many improvements are required, including reductions in data size, improved personal information protection, and reduced operating costs.

[1]  Philippe Ravaud,et al.  Blockchain technology for improving clinical research quality , 2017, Trials.

[2]  T. Mackey,et al.  A review of existing and emerging digital technologies to combat the global trade in fake medicines , 2017, Expert opinion on drug safety.

[3]  Yu Rang Park,et al.  Managing Patient-Generated Health Data Through Mobile Personal Health Records: Analysis of Usage Data , 2018, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[4]  Shanlin Yang,et al.  Blockchain-Based Medical Records Secure Storage and Medical Service Framework , 2018, Journal of Medical Systems.

[5]  Hao Wang,et al.  Secure Cloud-Based EHR System Using Attribute-Based Cryptosystem and Blockchain , 2018, Journal of Medical Systems.

[6]  Barbara Pierscionek,et al.  The Effect of the General Data Protection Regulation on Medical Research , 2017, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Yu Rang Park,et al.  Enchanted Life Space: Adding Value to Smart Health by Integrating Human Desires , 2018, Healthcare informatics research.

[8]  Jae Ho Lee,et al.  A De-identification Method for Bilingual Clinical Texts of Various Note Types , 2014, Journal of Korean medical science.

[9]  Josette F. Jones,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Patient Engagement and Health Behavior Change: A Systematic Review of the Literature , 2016, JMIR medical informatics.

[10]  Catherine Georgina Russell,et al.  Assessing User Engagement of an mHealth Intervention: Development and Implementation of the Growing Healthy App Engagement Index , 2017, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[11]  Sarah Underwood,et al.  Blockchain beyond bitcoin , 2016, Commun. ACM.

[12]  D. Blazquez,et al.  Big Data sources and methods for social and economic analyses , 2017 .

[13]  Ann Scheck McAlearney,et al.  Information technology to support patient engagement: where do we stand and where can we go? , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[14]  Eli Ben-Sasson,et al.  Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin , 2014, 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy.

[15]  Cristiano André da Costa,et al.  OmniPHR: A distributed architecture model to integrate personal health records , 2017, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[16]  Lisa P. Newmark,et al.  Patient-Facing Mobile Apps to Treat High-Need, High-Cost Populations: A Scoping Review , 2016, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[17]  Michael Eisenstein,et al.  Big data: The power of petabytes , 2015, Nature.

[18]  David W. Bates,et al.  White Paper: Personal Health Records: Definitions, Benefits, and Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adoption , 2006, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[19]  Kimberly Thomas,et al.  Improving patient health engagement with mobile texting: A pilot study in the head and neck postoperative setting , 2017, Head & neck.

[20]  S. Steinhubl,et al.  High-Definition Medicine , 2017, Cell.

[21]  Soo-Yong Shin,et al.  Characteristics Desired in Clinical Data Warehouse for Biomedical Research , 2014, Healthcare informatics research.

[22]  Charlene R. Weir,et al.  Understanding Adoption of a Personal Health Record in Rural Health Care Clinics: Revealing Barriers and Facilitators of Adoption including Attributions about Potential Patient Portal Users and Self-reported Characteristics of Early Adopting Users , 2013, AMIA.