Group Perceptual Quality Optimization for Multi-Channel Image Encoding Systems Based on Adaptive Hyper Networks

Images and short videos that produced by social networks surge in recent years. Image/Video encoders, such as JPEG and H.264, are indispensably involved to reduce the transmitting bandwidth. However, based on our observation, the encoding parameters and their candidates are often preset to fixed values (or fixed candidate values) in real-world scenarios, which might not be the optimal bandwidth allocation strategy. Considering that, we propose an efficient group quality optimization (GQO) framework for multi-channel image/video encoding systems in which the encoding parameters are configured in a perceptual-quality-driven manner. The GQO framework employs adaptive hyper network to predict the relationships between encoding parameters, transmitting resources, and perceptual qualities, i.e., just taking the pristine image as input, the adaptive hyper network could accurately yield a global overview of perceptual quality and transmitting resource varied along encoding parameters. A step-by-step optimization procedure is then employed to search the optimal encoding parameter for each channel so that overall perceptual quality could be maximized under limited transmitting resource. Experimental results demonstrate the proposed GQO framework could achieve higher perceptual quality whilst maintain the same bandwidth compared to traditional allocation strategies where encoding parameters are preset.

[1]  Sanghoon Lee,et al.  Fully Deep Blind Image Quality Predictor , 2017, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing.

[2]  David Zhang,et al.  FSIM: A Feature Similarity Index for Image Quality Assessment , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Luca De Cicco,et al.  ELASTIC: A Client-Side Controller for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) , 2013, 2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop.

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[5]  Tai-Yin Chiu,et al.  Assessing Image Quality Issues for Real-World Problems , 2020, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[6]  Kwan-Yee Lin,et al.  Hallucinated-IQA: No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Adversarial Learning , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[7]  Yi Li,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of image quality and distortion via multi-task convolutional neural networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP).

[8]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Using Multi-Method Fusion , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[9]  Yi Li,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[10]  Xiaoyu Ma,et al.  Performance validation and analysis for multi-method fusion based image quality metrics in a new image database , 2019, China Communications.

[11]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Yu Zhu,et al.  Blindly Assess Image Quality in the Wild Guided by a Self-Adaptive Hyper Network , 2020, 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[13]  Mariusz Oszust,et al.  Decision Fusion for Image Quality Assessment using an Optimization Approach , 2016, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[14]  Jiwen Lu,et al.  PCANet: A Simple Deep Learning Baseline for Image Classification? , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Nanning Zheng,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Using Similar Scene as Reference , 2016, ECCV.

[16]  Yuan Zhang,et al.  Blind Predicting Similar Quality Map for Image Quality Assessment , 2018, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[17]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[18]  Qi Tian,et al.  Scalable Person Re-identification: A Benchmark , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).

[19]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Gradient Magnitude Similarity Deviation: A Highly Efficient Perceptual Image Quality Index , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[20]  Eric C. Larson,et al.  Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy , 2010, J. Electronic Imaging.

[21]  Hongyu Li,et al.  VSI: A Visual Saliency-Induced Index for Perceptual Image Quality Assessment , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[22]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Motion-based perceptual quality assessment of video , 2009, Electronic Imaging.

[23]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  Color image database TID2013: Peculiarities and preliminary results , 2013, European Workshop on Visual Information Processing (EUVIP).

[24]  Joost van de Weijer,et al.  RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV).