Sustainable Timber Use In Residential Construction: Perception Versus Reality

Close to 90% of new project homes in NSW, Australia are constructed with reinforced concrete flooring and brick veneer envelope whereas many traditional Australian homes were built of timber floor structures with timber walls and cladding. The adoption of concrete and brick homes originated from a perceived advantage of longevity, low maintenance and thermal comfort. Innovation in wood treatments, wood protection and insulation have provided solutions to these issues so that timber is once again a viable option with added benefits such as environmental sustainability and erection speed. This paper reviews literature and analyses the results of a home occupants’ survey on the perception of timber use in new homes in NSW, Australia. It also investigates the comparative performance of a timber veneer/structural timber home to a concrete floor/brick veneer home to evaluate whether perception of timber performance matches reality. This paper highlights Australian homeowners’ reluctance to use timber as a sustainable building product for homes even when they are willing to pay for a more environmentally sustainable home. It also discusses the time and environmental advantages of a timber home over a concrete and brick home based on the results of a test case study.

[1]  T. Muneer,et al.  Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland , 2007 .

[2]  John Holmberg,et al.  Concrete vs. wood in buildings – An energy system approach , 2012 .

[3]  Arild Gustavsen,et al.  Aerogel insulation for building applications: A state-of-the-art review , 2011 .

[4]  Stefan Gold,et al.  Consumer attitudes towards timber as a construction material and towards timber frame houses – selected findings of a representative survey among the German population , 2009 .

[5]  Antonios N. Papadopoulos,et al.  The biological effectiveness of wood modified with linear chain carboxylic acid anhydrides against the subterranean termites Reticulitermes flavipes , 2008, Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff.

[6]  Hans-Jörg Althaus,et al.  Relevance of simplifications in LCA of building components , 2009 .

[7]  Anders Roos,et al.  The Influence of Architects and Structural Engineers on Timber in Construction - Perceptions and Roles , 2010 .

[8]  Danny Hopkin,et al.  Large scale natural fire tests on protected engineered timber floor systems , 2010 .

[9]  Joseph Iwaro,et al.  Modeling the performance of residential building envelope: The role of sustainable energy performanc , 2011 .

[10]  Giovanni Andrea Blengini,et al.  The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings , 2010 .

[11]  Gregory Nolan.  Timber in multi-residential, commercial and industrial building: recognising opportunities and constraints , 2011 .

[12]  Keith Crews,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TIMBER USE IN THE AUSTRALIAN HOUSING MARKET: ARE CONSUMERS WILLING TO PAY THE PRICE? , 2013 .

[13]  Brenda Vale,et al.  Life cycle analysis model for New Zealand houses , 2004 .

[14]  Anders Ågren,et al.  Potential solutions to improved sound performance of volume based lightweight multi-storey timber buildings , 2011 .

[15]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  General Conditions for Construction of Multi-storey Wooden Buildings in Western Europe , 2009 .