Deformation behaviour of aluminium during machining: Modelling by Eulerian and smoothed-particle hydrodynamics methods

Large-strain deformation behaviour of aluminium that accompanies continuous chip formation during machining (1100 Al) has been studied using experimental and numerical techniques. In experimental studies, local values of plastic strains were determined in the primary and the secondary deformation zones of machined 1100 Al. This was completed through a careful examination of metallographic sections taken from the material ahead of the tool tip, in which orientation changes in the flow lines in the material and shear angles were used to calculate plastic strains. Variations in local flow stresses were estimated from microhardness measurements. The examination of the stresses and strains at each measurement location generated a stress—strain relationship for the 1100 Al material. An important observation from the experimental portion of this research indicated that the material stress—strain response was independent of the feed rates considered in this study. Additionally, the response was observed to obey an exponential relationship with stress saturation occurring at approximately 300 MPa. Parameters associated with the Johnson—Cook constitutive equation were also determined from the experimental work. An Eulerian finite-element method and a relatively new so-called mesh-free method [smoothed-particle hydrodynamics (SPH) method] have been applied to the simulation of machining. The application of these methods permits simulation of the machining process without use of any mesh separation criterion. Appropriate values of the coefficients of friction, for numerical studies, were determined in parametric studies by correlating the experimentally measured chip thicknesses with the numerically predicted values. The effectiveness of the Eulerian and SPH methods in predicting the response of 1100 Al during orthogonal machining has been assessed through a rigorous comparison of the stress—strain distribution within formed chips during steady-state cutting. Both the Eulerian and SPH models showed good overall correlation with the experimentally measured stress—strain distribution when the exponential type material behaviour was assumed in modelling. A maximum stress of 300 MPa at the tool tip was obtained from the numerical simulations using the assumed exponential material behaviour. The location of maximum stress corresponded to the position of maximum strain (8.0). The application of the Johnson—Cook type constitutive equation resulted in predicting a lower maximum equivalent strain (4.5) and higher maximum stresses (325 MPa).

[1]  D. Benson,et al.  Contact in a multi-material Eulerian finite element formulation , 2004 .

[2]  V. Fortov,et al.  Numerical modeling of hypervelocity impacts , 2006 .

[3]  R. Lewis,et al.  A three‐invariant hardening plasticity for numerical simulation of powder forming processes via the arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian FE model , 2006 .

[4]  E. Voce,et al.  The relationship between stress and strain for homogeneous deformations , 1948 .

[5]  Guirong Liu,et al.  Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics: A Meshfree Particle Method , 2003 .

[6]  G. R. Johnson,et al.  Hypervelocity impact computations with finite elements and meshfree particles , 2006 .

[7]  M. Ortiz,et al.  Modelling and simulation of high-speed machining , 1995 .

[8]  Xiaomin Deng,et al.  Finite Element Analysis of the Orthogonal Metal Cutting Process , 2000 .

[9]  Mhamed Souli,et al.  High explosive simulation using multi-material formulations , 2006 .

[10]  Zone-Ching Lin,et al.  Three-dimensional cutting process analysis with different cutting velocities , 1997 .

[11]  J. H. Dautzenberg,et al.  Quantitative determination of deformation by sliding wear , 1973 .

[12]  Ship-Peng Lo,et al.  An analysis of cutting under different rake angles using the finite element method , 2000 .

[13]  J. Strenkowski,et al.  Finite element prediction of chip geometry and tool/workpiece temperature distributions in orthogonal metal cutting , 1990 .

[14]  A. Moufki,et al.  Numerical modelling of orthogonal cutting: Influence of cutting conditions and separation criterion , 2006 .

[15]  Michel Salaün,et al.  SPH method applied to high speed cutting modelling , 2007 .

[16]  Mohamed A. Elbestawi,et al.  Modelling the effects of tool-edge radius on residual stresses when orthogonal cutting AISI 316L , 2007 .

[17]  Xiong Zhang,et al.  An explicit material point finite element method for hyper‐velocity impact , 2006 .

[18]  Wei H. Yang,et al.  Analysis of orthogonal metal cutting processes , 1992 .

[19]  Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.  Application of 2D FEM to chip formation in orthogonal cutting , 1996 .

[20]  Jaroslav Mackerle Finite element methods and material processing technology, an addendum (1994‐1996) , 1998 .

[21]  A. Alpas,et al.  Delamination wear in ductile materials containing second phase particles , 1993 .

[22]  Mahesh Prakash,et al.  Modeling of cast systems using smoothed-particle hydrodynamics , 2004 .

[23]  Sivakumar Kulasegaram,et al.  Correction and stabilization of smooth particle hydrodynamics methods with applications in metal forming simulations , 2000 .

[24]  David R. Owen,et al.  Aspects of ductile fracture and adaptive mesh refinement in damaged elasto‐plastic materials , 2001 .

[25]  Zone-Ching Lin,et al.  A study of deformation of the machined workpiece and tool under different low cutting velocities with an elastic cutting tool , 1998 .

[26]  William Altenhof,et al.  An eulerian finite-element model for determination of deformation state of a copper subjected to orthogonal cutting , 2004 .

[27]  Jaroslav Mackerle,et al.  Finite-element analysis and simulation of machining: a bibliography (1976–1996) , 1999 .

[28]  L. Lucy A numerical approach to the testing of the fission hypothesis. , 1977 .

[29]  J. Monaghan,et al.  Smoothed particle hydrodynamics: Theory and application to non-spherical stars , 1977 .

[30]  Yong-Shin Lee An Eulerian finite element model for the steady state forming of porous materials , 2006 .

[31]  Elisabetta Ceretti,et al.  Turning simulations using a three-dimensional FEM code , 2000 .

[32]  Ahmet T. Alpas,et al.  Mechanical properties and microstructures of 1100 aluminum subjected to dry machining , 2004 .

[33]  P. Levashov,et al.  Hypervelocity impact modeling with different equations of state , 2006 .

[34]  M. A. Moore,et al.  Plastic deformation below worn surfaces , 1976 .

[35]  Lars-Erik Lindgren,et al.  Modelling and Simulation of Machining Processes , 2007 .

[36]  Jaroslav Mackerle,et al.  Finite element analysis and simulation of machining: an addendum: A bibliography (1996–2002) , 2003 .

[37]  John S. Strenkowski,et al.  Finite element models of orthogonal cutting with application to single point diamond turning , 1988 .

[38]  F. P. Bowden,et al.  The Friction and Lubrication of Solids , 1964 .