Human walks carefully when the ground dynamic coefficient of friction drops below 0.41

This study investigated the available and utilized friction during non-slip gait in level walking, and determined the limit which human starts to walk carefully to adapt to slippery surface. Sixteen floor–footwear-contaminant conditions with different slipperiness (dynamic coefficient of friction, DCOF, from 0.11 to 1.06) were employed. Fifteen harnessed Chinese male performed ten self-paced walking trials in each condition without slips. The utilized friction (COFu) was obtained from the maximum value of shear to normal ground reaction force ratio during the first 25% stance. ANOVA and Tukey tests showed three subsets with similar COFu, and confirmed the hypothesis that the utilized friction drops gradually when the available friction drops below a certain critical limit. Non-linear regression models were applied to the data to determine the COFu to be 0.20 and the limit of available ground friction which human starts to walk carefully to adapt to slippery surface (DCOFlimit) to be 0.41.

[1]  R. Cham,et al.  Changes in gait when anticipating slippery floors. , 2002, Gait & Posture.

[2]  J W Runge,et al.  The cost of injury. , 1993, Emergency medicine clinics of North America.

[3]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices , 2001, Ergonomics.

[4]  A. Patla,et al.  Strategies for dynamic stability during locomotion on a slippery surface: effects of prior experience and knowledge. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  M S Redfern,et al.  Biomechanics of slips , 2001, Ergonomics.

[6]  T K Courtney,et al.  Disabling occupational morbidity in the United States. An alternative way of seeing the Bureau of Labor Statistics' data. , 1999, Journal of occupational and environmental medicine.

[7]  S. Banks,et al.  High-resolution force plate analysis of utilized slip resistance in human walking , 1996 .

[8]  J. T. Inglis,et al.  The effect of subject awareness and prior slip experience on tribometer-based predictions of slip probability. , 2006, Gait & posture.

[9]  Simon Matz,et al.  The validity and reliability of a portable slip meter for determining floor slipperiness during simulated heel strike. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Enrique Alcántara,et al.  Identification of floor friction safety level for public buildings considering mobility disabled people needs , 2005 .

[11]  Christopher M Powers,et al.  Comparison of utilized coefficient of friction during different walking tasks in persons with and without a disability. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[12]  Chuansi Gao,et al.  A systems perspective of slip and fall accidents on icy and snowy surfaces , 2004, Ergonomics.

[13]  Wayne S Maynard.  Tribology: preventing slips and falls in the workplace. , 2002, Occupational health & safety.

[14]  R Myung,et al.  The effect of load carrying and floor contaminants on slip and fall parameters. , 1997, Ergonomics.

[15]  L Strandberg,et al.  On accident analysis and slip-resistance measurement. , 1983, Ergonomics.

[16]  R. Cumming,et al.  Fall Frequency and Characteristics and the Risk of Hip Fractures , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  R Grönqvist,et al.  An apparatus and a method for determining the slip resistance of shoes and floors by simulation of human foot motions. , 1989, Ergonomics.

[18]  Mark S. Redfern,et al.  Slip resistance of the shoe-floor interface under biomechanically-relevant conditions , 1994 .

[19]  M S Redfern,et al.  Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[20]  Youlian Hong,et al.  Lower-extremity gait kinematics on slippery surfaces in construction worksites. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.