Managing Technology Development for Safety-Critical Systems

This paper presents a model that determines the optimal budget allocation strategy for the development of new technologies, for safety-critical systems, over multiple decision periods. The case of the development of a hypersonic passenger airplane is used as an illustration. The model takes into account both the probability of technology development success as a function of the allocated budget and the probability of operational performance of the final system. It assumes that the strategy is to consider (and possibly fund) several approaches to the development of each technology to maximize the probability of development success. The model, thus, decomposes the system's development process into multiple technology development modules (one for each technology needed), each involving a number of alternative projects. There is a tradeoff between development speed and operational reliability when the budget must be allocated among alternative technology projects with different probabilities of development success and operational reliability (e.g., an easily and quickly developed technology may have little robustness). The probabilities of development and operational failures are balanced by a risk analysis approach, which allows the decision maker to optimize the budget allocation among different projects in the development program, at the beginning of each budget period. The model indicates that by considering reliability in the R&D management process, the decision maker can make better decisions, optimizing the balance between development time, cost, and robustness of safety-critical systems.

[1]  William E. Souder,et al.  The validity of subjective probability of success forecasts by R & D project managers , 1969 .

[2]  E. Prescott,et al.  Investment Under Uncertainty , 1971 .

[3]  James R. Freeland,et al.  Recent progress in modeling R&D project-selection processes , 1992 .

[4]  W. Souder Analytical Effectiveness of Mathematical Models for R&D Project Selection , 1973 .

[5]  Alexander J. Triantis,et al.  Dynamic R&D Investment Policies , 1999 .

[6]  R. Nelson Uncertainty, Learning, and the Economics of Parallel Research and Development Efforts , 1961 .

[7]  Dimitri N. Mavris,et al.  A Method for the Identification and Assessment of Critical Technologies Needed for an Economically Viable HSCT , 1995 .

[8]  Reiko Aoki,et al.  R&D Competition for Product Innovation: An Endless Race , 1991 .

[9]  Young H. Chun,et al.  Sequential decisions under uncertainty in the R&D project selection problem , 1994 .

[10]  Manohar U. Kalwani,et al.  Selecting product development projects: pioneering versus incremental innovation strategies , 1993 .

[11]  M. S. Bazaraa,et al.  Nonlinear Programming , 1979 .

[12]  C. Derman,et al.  Optimal System Allocations with Penalty Costs , 1976 .

[13]  M. C. Bryson,et al.  Decision analysis in project management: An overview , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[14]  R. Nelson The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[15]  Robin L. Dillon,et al.  APRAM: an advanced programmatic risk analysis method , 2001 .

[16]  James E. Smith,et al.  Valuing Risky Projects: Option Pricing Theory and Decision Analysis , 1995 .

[17]  Elizabeth J. Jensen Research Expenditures and the Discovery of New Drugs , 1987 .

[18]  Matthew J. Liberatore R&D project selection , 1986 .

[19]  Matthew J. Liberatore,et al.  The Practice of Management Science in R&D Project Management : Management Science , 1983 .

[20]  Ronald A. Howard,et al.  Readings on the Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis , 1989 .

[21]  John H. Friar,et al.  Factors for success in R&D projects and new product innovation: a contextual framework , 1997 .