We have built a hybrid voice/text web–board that utilizes floor control for handling resources such as microphone and interface events. The aim of this research is to determine the most appropriate floor control mechanism for a hybrid communication tool that allows conventional text and audio users to communicate with one another using a common interface. Research on floor control mechanisms provides many implementations for arbitration that are application-specific. Myers proposes a categorical explanation of the most widely used mechanisms for providing floor control and discusses these different dimensions with respect to a project called Pebbles. We have chosen to model our arbitration policies along these categories. The application will be implemented as a Java applet and gives users a view of both the text and audio aspects of the exchange. To facilitate the multi-modality of the system we will provide media conversion, using the Nuance system’s Java API. Our hypothesis is that well–known multi-tasking arbitration protocols such as FCFS, Round Robin, Token – based, and many more can be adapted to create a conferencing floor control policy for the interface of a hybrid communication environment so as to facilitate free–flowing multi-modal conversation. Measurements to determine which floor control implementation provides the best arbitration in terms of user interaction with the system will be calculated using RPT, ORT and usage tests based on the Kirkpatrick Model. We hope to show that users benefit more from an implicit arbitration mechanism than they do from an explicit one. Index Terms arbitration, floor control, hybrid voice/text, web-board
[1]
Brad A. Myers,et al.
Floor Control in a Highly Collaborative Co-Located Task
,
2000
.
[2]
Jang Soo Kim,et al.
TattleTrail: An Archiving Voice Chat System for Mobile Users Over Internet Protocol
,
2002
.
[3]
Ian Wakeman,et al.
The conference control channel protocol (CCCP): a scalable base for building conference control applications
,
1995,
SIGCOMM '95.
[4]
Ephraim P. Glinert,et al.
CAMELOT: technology focused testing of CSCW applications
,
2003,
36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.
[5]
J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves,et al.
Floor control for multimedia conferencing and collaboration
,
1997,
Multimedia Systems.
[6]
Milton Chen.
Achieving effective floor control with a low-bandwidth gesture-sensitive videoconferencing system
,
2002,
MULTIMEDIA '02.
[7]
Lawrence A. Rowe,et al.
Floor control for large-scale MBone seminars
,
1997,
MULTIMEDIA '97.
[8]
J. Strother,et al.
An Assessment of the Effectiveness of e-learning in Corporate Training Programs
,
2002
.
[9]
Kevin Jeffay,et al.
Issues, Problems and Solutions in Sharing X Clients on Multiple Displays
,
1994
.
[10]
Marc Smith,et al.
Conversation trees and threaded chats
,
2000,
CSCW '00.
[11]
P. Venkat Rangan,et al.
Multimedia Conferencing as a Universal Paradigm for Collaboration
,
1992
.