Evaluating the materials used for hydrogen production based on photoelectrochemical technology

Hydrogen as a CO 2 -free fuel has been considered as a serious alternative for problematic fossil fuels in recent decades Photoelectrochemical (PEC) water splitting is a developing solar-based technology for hydrogen production. In this study, some possible options for upgrading this technology from R&D stage to prototype stage through a material selection approach is investigated. For these purpose, TOPSIS algorithm through a multi criteria decision making (MCDM) approach was utilized for evaluating different (PEC)-based hydrogen production materials. TiO 2 , WO 3 and BiVO 4 as three semiconductors known for their PEC application, were selected as alternatives in this decision-making study. After defining a set of criteria, which were assessed based on similar studies and experts' visions, a group of ten PEC-experts including university professors and PhD students were asked to fill the questionnaires. The eight criteria considered in this study are include "Study Cost", "Synthesis Simplicity", "Facility & Availability", "Deposition capability on TCO", "Modifiability", "Commercialization in H 2 production", "Physical and Chemical Durability" and "Eco-friendly Fabrication". The final TOPSIS results indicates that TiO 2 is selected as the best semiconductor for further investments in order to upgrade the PEC-based hydrogen production technology from R&D level to prototype stage. ©2019. CBIORE-IJRED. All rights reserved

[1]  Helder Gomes Costa,et al.  Modeling selection criteria of R&D projects for awarding direct subsidies to the private sector , 2016 .

[2]  I. Dincer,et al.  A review and evaluation of photoelectrode coating materials and methods for photoelectrochemical hydrogen production , 2016 .

[3]  Bert R. Meijboom,et al.  Review and Evaluation , 1987 .

[4]  Patrick Drogui,et al.  Modified TiO2 For Environmental Photocatalytic Applications: A Review , 2013 .

[5]  Jie Wang,et al.  Wind Energy Potential at Badin and Pasni Costal Line of Pakistan , 2017 .

[6]  A. Kassiba,et al.  Mechanochemical synthesis of nanostructured BiVO4 and investigations of related features , 2012 .

[7]  W. Pfaffenberger,et al.  Promotion of Renewable Energy Sources in the European Union , 2015 .

[8]  M. Kanoğlu.  GEOTHERMAL ENERGY USE IN HYDROGEN PRODUCTION , 2016 .

[9]  K. Uematsu,et al.  Hydrothermal synthesis of meso/macroporous BiVO4 hierarchical particles and their photocatalytic degradation properties under visible light irradiation , 2013, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach ☆ , 2008 .

[11]  Andrew Mills,et al.  An overview of semiconductor photocatalysis , 1997 .

[12]  Ryu Abe,et al.  Recent progress on photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical water splitting under visible light irradiation , 2010 .

[13]  Huiru Zhao,et al.  Evaluating the performance of thermal power enterprises using sustainability balanced scorecard, fuzzy Delphic and hybrid multi-criteria decision making approaches for sustainability , 2015 .

[14]  Zhengxiao Guo,et al.  Visible-light driven heterojunction photocatalysts for water splitting – a critical review , 2015 .

[15]  B. W. Ang,et al.  A comparative analysis of R&D project evaluation methods , 2001 .

[16]  K. Sumathy,et al.  A review and recent developments in photocatalytic water-splitting using TiO2 for hydrogen production , 2007 .

[17]  M. Hudson,et al.  Regional scale wind farm and solar farm suitability assessment using GIS-assisted multi-criteria evaluation , 2015 .

[18]  Shu-Ping Chang,et al.  Using Balanced Scorecard for Sustainable Design-centered Manufacturing☆ , 2015 .

[19]  M. Nazari,et al.  Applications of nanofluids in geothermal: A review , 2018, Mathematical Modelling of Engineering Problems.

[20]  Dessy Ariyanti,et al.  Potency of Solar Energy Applications in Indonesia , 2012 .

[21]  Wolfgang Rauch,et al.  Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Support Methods for Integrated Rehabilitation Prioritization , 2017 .

[22]  M. Ahmadi,et al.  Medical and dental applications of renewable energy systems , 2018, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies.

[23]  M. Nazari,et al.  Application of nanofluids in thermosyphons: A review , 2018, Journal of Molecular Liquids.

[24]  Heba Ali,et al.  Decoration of vertically aligned TiO2 nanotube arrays with WO3 particles for hydrogen fuel production , 2018 .

[25]  S. Sarto,et al.  Effect of Different Inoculum Combination on Biohydrogen Production from Melon Fruit Waste , 2018, International Journal of Renewable Energy Development.

[26]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[27]  A. Naeimi,et al.  Multiobjective optimization design of the solar field and reverse osmosis system with preheating feed water using Genetic algorithm , 2018, Energy Science & Engineering.

[28]  Tingzhen Ming,et al.  Solar power technology for electricity generation: A critical review , 2018, Energy Science & Engineering.

[29]  F. Dinkelacker,et al.  A Comparative Study of Different Reaction Models for Turbulent Methane/Hydrogen/Air Combustion , 2015 .

[30]  Roghayeh Ghasempour,et al.  Analysis of Solar Farm Site Selection Based on TOPSIS Approach , 2018 .

[31]  Qian Yu,et al.  Sustainable technology selection decision-making model for enterprise in supply chain: Based on a modified strategic balanced scorecard , 2017 .

[32]  W. Shangguan,et al.  Roles of various Ni species on TiO2 in enhancing photocatalytic H2 evolution , 2018, Frontiers in Energy.

[33]  Mietek Jaroniec,et al.  Anatase TiO2 with Dominant High-Energy {001} Facets: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications , 2011 .

[34]  Pao-Long Chang,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision making method for technology transfer strategy selection in biotechnology , 1994 .

[35]  Mohammad Hossein Ahmadi,et al.  Analysis of stakeholder roles and the challenges of solar energy utilization in Iran , 2018, International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies.

[36]  Wen-Pai Wang,et al.  A Multi-criteria Assessment for R&D Innovation with Fuzzy Computing with Words , 2015, MCO.

[37]  M. Nazari,et al.  A review on the solar applications of thermosyphons , 2018 .

[38]  Adriana Zaleska,et al.  Doped-TiO2: A Review , 2008 .

[39]  Rahman Saidur,et al.  Multi-objective optimization in a finite time thermodynamic method for dish-Stirling by branch and bound method and MOPSO algorithm , 2020 .

[40]  Kamaljyoti Talukdar,et al.  Modeling and Analysis of Solar Photovoltaic Assisted Electrolyzer-Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell For Running a Hospital in Remote Area in Kolkata, India , 2017 .

[41]  W. Shangguan,et al.  Hydrogen production from water splitting on CdS-based photocatalysts using solar light , 2013, Frontiers in Energy.

[42]  Joseph E. Yourey.  Photoelectrochemical and Photocatalytic Water Oxidation using Metal Oxides. , 2014 .

[43]  Majid Vafaeipour,et al.  Assessment of regions priority for implementation of solar projects in Iran: New application of a hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach , 2014 .

[44]  Francisco Rodrigues Lima Junior,et al.  A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection , 2014, Appl. Soft Comput..

[45]  Nicolas Perry,et al.  Comparison of different Multiple-criteria decision analysis methods in the context of conceptual design: application to the development of a solar collector structure , 2014 .

[46]  Morteza Ebrahimi,et al.  MCDM Approach for Selecting Solar Plants Site and Technology: A Review , 2017 .

[47]  Fathollah Pourfayaz,et al.  Thermodynamic and economic analysis of performance evaluation of all the thermal power plants: A review , 2018, Energy Science & Engineering.

[48]  M. Sadeghzadeh,et al.  Thermo-economic and exergy assessment and optimization of performance of a hydrogen production system by using geothermal energy , 2018, Energy & Environment.