TMS of the FEF Interferes with Spatial Conflict

In the Simon task, a conflict arises because irrelevant spatial information competes for response selection either facilitating or interfering with performance. Responses are faster when stimulus and response position correspond than when they do not. The FEFs, which have long been characterized for their role in oculomotor control, are also involved in the control of visuospatial attention when eye movements are not required. This study was aimed at investigating whether the FEFs contribute to spatial conflict. Double-pulse TMS was applied to the FEF of either left or right hemisphere during the execution of a Simon task at different time windows after the onset of the visual stimulus. A suppression of the Simon effect was observed after stimulation of the FEF for stimuli appearing in the contralateral hemifield when TMS was applied to the left hemisphere after stimulus onset (0–40 and 40–80 msec). A reduction of the correspondence effect was observed after right FEF TMS for stimuli presented in the left visual hemifield when stimulation was delivered in the 80–120 msec range after stimulus onset. These outcomes indicate that the FEF play a critical role in encoding spatial attribute of a stimulus for response priming, which is the prerequisite for response conflict in the Simon task. Moreover, our finding that the left FEF have a dominant role during spatial conflict extends the idea of the left-hemisphere lateralization of the motor network in action selection by suggesting that the FEF may constitute part of this network.

[1]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  The timing of the involvement of the frontal eye fields and posterior parietal cortex in visual search , 2008, Neuroreport.

[2]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Response selection and attention orienting: a computational model of Simon effect asymmetries. , 2009, Experimental psychology.

[3]  S. Brandt,et al.  Executive control over response priming and conflict: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Human frontal eye fields and visual search. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  B. Hommel Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[6]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Dissociation of visual discrimination from saccade programming in macaque frontal eye field. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  M. Rushworth,et al.  The left parietal and premotor cortices: motor attention and selection , 2003, NeuroImage.

[8]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  On the roles of the human frontal eye fields and parietal cortex in visual search , 2006 .

[9]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Differential effects of central and peripheral cues on the reorienting of spatial attention. , 1991 .

[10]  Carlo Marzi,et al.  The role of frontal eye-fields and superior colliculi in visual search and non-visual search in rhesus monkeys , 1982, Behavioural Brain Research.

[11]  R. Verleger,et al.  Validity and boundary conditions of automatic response activation in the Simon task. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[13]  A. Moser,et al.  Lack of oculomotor response after transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1991 .

[14]  Tony Ro,et al.  Modulation of antisaccades by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Brain Mapping: The Methods , 2002 .

[16]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Horizontal and vertical Simon effect: different underlying mechanisms? , 2005, Cognition.

[17]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Reorienting attention across the horizontal and vertical meridians: Evidence in favor of a premotor theory of attention , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Takashi R Sato,et al.  Effects of Stimulus-Response Compatibility on Neural Selection in Frontal Eye Field , 2003, Neuron.

[20]  C. W. Hess,et al.  Transcranial stimulation of the human frontal eye field by magnetic pulses , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[21]  James L. McClelland,et al.  On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect. , 1990, Psychological review.

[22]  O Hikosaka,et al.  Visualization of the information flow through human oculomotor cortical regions by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Attention shifts produce spatial stimulus codes , 1994, Psychological research.

[24]  C. Umilta,et al.  Two orienting mechanisms in posterior parietal lobule: An rTMS study of the Simon and SNARC effects , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[25]  Daniela Mapelli,et al.  The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect? , 2003, Cognition.

[26]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Cortical plasticity in perceptual learning demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[27]  R. Passingham,et al.  Temporary interference in human lateral premotor cortex suggests dominance for the selection of movements. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[28]  Neil G. Muggleton,et al.  Timing of Target Discrimination in Human Frontal Eye Fields , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[29]  C. Pierrot-Deseilligny,et al.  Cortical control of saccades in man. , 1991, Acta neurologica Belgica.

[30]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[31]  Joy J. Geng,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Review Re-evaluating the Role of Tpj in Attentional Control: Contextual Updating? , 2022 .

[32]  A. Osman,et al.  Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy. , 1990, Psychological review.

[33]  R. Proctor,et al.  The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  The Simon effect and handedness: Evidence for a dominant-hand attentional bias in spatial coding , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[35]  O. Blanke,et al.  Location of the human frontal eye field as defined by electrical cortical stimulation: anatomical, functional and electrophysiological characteristics , 2000, Neuroreport.

[36]  E Wyllie,et al.  Versive eye movements elicited by cortical stimulation of the human brain , 1990, Neurology.

[37]  C Iani,et al.  The Simon effect occurs relative to the direction of an attention shift. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  E. Wassermann Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[39]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[40]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[41]  Elger L Abrahamse,et al.  The premotor theory of attention and the Simon effect. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[42]  B. Hommel The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[43]  A. Cowey,et al.  The effect of ablation of frontal eye-fields and superior colliculi on visual stability and movement discrimination in rhesus monkeys , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  Sami Schiff,et al.  Timing Spatial Conflict within the Parietal Cortex: A TMS Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[45]  T. Paus Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  T. Paus,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Human Frontal Eye Field: Effects on Visual Perception and Attention , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Combining TMS and EEG to study cognitive function and cortico–cortico interactions , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[48]  Roberto Nicoletti,et al.  Spatial stimulus-response compatibility. , 1990 .

[49]  B Hommel,et al.  The role of attention for the Simon effect , 1993, Psychological research.

[50]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Contribution of frontal cortex to the spatial representation of number , 2011, Cortex.

[51]  Giovanni Galfano,et al.  Breaking Ranks: Space and Number May March to the Beat of a Different Drum , 2006, Cortex.

[52]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Critical Time Course of Right Frontoparietal Involvement in Mental Number Space , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  R. Rafal,et al.  Localization of the human frontal eye fields and motor hand area with transcranial magnetic stimulation and magnetic resonance imaging , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left human frontal eye fields eliminates the cost of invalid endogenous cues , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[55]  R. E Passingham,et al.  Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Dissociation of spatial attention and saccade preparation. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Segregation of visual selection and saccades in human frontal eye fields. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[58]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  E. Lauber,et al.  Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[60]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field , 1996, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[61]  M. Zorzi,et al.  The role of long-term-memory and short-term-memory links in the Simon effect. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  T Moore,et al.  Control of eye movements and spatial attention. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.