Nuclear transcriptome profiling of induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells identify non-coding loci resistant to reprogramming

Identification of functionally relevant differences between induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) and reference embryonic stem cells (ESC) remains a central question for therapeutic applications. Differences in gene expression between iPSC and ESC have been examined by microarray and more recently with RNA-SEQ technologies. We here report an in depth analyses of nuclear and cytoplasmic transcriptomes, using the CAGE (cap analysis of gene expression) technology, for 5 iPSC clones derived from mouse lymphocytes B and 3 ESC lines. This approach reveals nuclear transcriptomes significantly more complex in ESC than in iPSC. Hundreds of yet not annotated putative non-coding RNAs and enhancer-associated transcripts specifically transcribed in ESC have been detected and supported with epigenetic and chromatin-chromatin interactions data. We identified super-enhancers transcriptionally active specifically in ESC and associated with genes implicated in the maintenance of pluripotency. Similarly, we detected non-coding transcripts of yet unknown function being regulated by ESC specific super-enhancers. Taken together, these results demonstrate that current protocols of iPSC reprogramming do not trigger activation of numerous cis-regulatory regions. It thus reinforces the need for already suggested deeper monitoring of the non-coding transcriptome when characterizing iPSC clones. Such differences in regulatory transcript expression may indeed impact their potential for clinical applications.

[1]  J. Nichols,et al.  Resetting Transcription Factor Control Circuitry toward Ground-State Pluripotency in Human , 2014, Cell.

[2]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Dynamic regulation of human endogenous retroviruses mediates factor-induced reprogramming and differentiation potential , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  A. Sandelin,et al.  Deep transcriptome profiling of mammalian stem cells supports a regulatory role for retrotransposons in pluripotency maintenance , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[4]  G. Bourque,et al.  The retrovirus HERVH is a long noncoding RNA required for human embryonic stem cell identity , 2014, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[5]  Shinya Yamanaka,et al.  iPS cells: a game changer for future medicine , 2014, The EMBO journal.

[6]  W. Sung,et al.  Chromatin connectivity maps reveal dynamic promoter–enhancer long-range associations , 2013, Nature.

[7]  S. Dunwoodie,et al.  Cited2, a Transcriptional Modulator Protein, Regulates Metabolism in Murine Embryonic Stem Cells* , 2013, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Master Transcription Factors and Mediator Establish Super-Enhancers at Key Cell Identity Genes , 2013, Cell.

[9]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Selective Inhibition of Tumor Oncogenes by Disruption of Super-Enhancers , 2013, Cell.

[10]  Laurent Gil,et al.  Ensembl 2013 , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[11]  Data production leads,et al.  An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome , 2012 .

[12]  Raymond K. Auerbach,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[13]  Nadav S. Bar,et al.  Landscape of transcription in human cells , 2012, Nature.

[14]  ENCODEConsortium,et al.  An Integrated Encyclopedia of DNA Elements in the Human Genome , 2012, Nature.

[15]  S. Dunwoodie,et al.  Cited2 Gene Controls Pluripotency and Cardiomyocyte Differentiation of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells through Oct4 Gene* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[16]  Piero Carninci,et al.  5′ end–centered expression profiling using cap-analysis gene expression and next-generation sequencing , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[17]  Ryan A. Flynn,et al.  A unique chromatin signature uncovers early developmental enhancers in humans , 2011, Nature.

[18]  Michael J. Ziller,et al.  Reference Maps of Human ES and iPS Cell Variation Enable High-Throughput Characterization of Pluripotent Cell Lines , 2011, Cell.

[19]  Aaron M. Newman,et al.  Lab-specific gene expression signatures in pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[20]  Richard A Young,et al.  Chromatin structure and gene expression programs of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[21]  David A. Orlando,et al.  Mediator and Cohesin Connect Gene Expression and Chromatin Architecture , 2010, Nature.

[22]  G. Bourque,et al.  Transposable elements have rewired the core regulatory network of human embryonic stem cells , 2010, Nature Genetics.

[23]  T. Quertermous,et al.  Persistent Donor Cell Gene Expression among Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells Contributes to Differences with Human Embryonic Stem Cells , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  Mark D. Robinson,et al.  edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data , 2009, Bioinform..

[25]  J. Nichols,et al.  Oct4 and LIF/Stat3 additively induce Krüppel factors to sustain embryonic stem cell self-renewal. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[26]  Fred H. Gage,et al.  Transcriptional Signature and Memory Retention of Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells , 2009, PloS one.

[27]  Carsten O. Daub,et al.  TagDust—a program to eliminate artifacts from next generation sequencing data , 2009, Bioinform..

[28]  Ge Guo,et al.  Nanog Is the Gateway to the Pluripotent Ground State , 2009, Cell.

[29]  Kristopher L. Nazor,et al.  Adult mice generated from induced pluripotent stem cells , 2009, Nature.

[30]  Mike J. Mason,et al.  Induced pluripotent stem cells and embryonic stem cells are distinguished by gene expression signatures. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[31]  Richard Durbin,et al.  Sequence analysis Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows – Wheeler transform , 2009 .

[32]  Nathaniel D. Heintzman,et al.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression , 2009, Nature.

[33]  Megan F. Cole,et al.  Connecting microRNA Genes to the Core Transcriptional Regulatory Circuitry of Embryonic Stem Cells , 2008, Cell.

[34]  B. Doble,et al.  The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal , 2008, Nature.

[35]  A. Krogh,et al.  A code for transcription initiation in mammalian genomes. , 2007, Genome research.

[36]  T. Ichisaka,et al.  Generation of germline-competent induced pluripotent stem cells , 2007, Nature.

[37]  R. Jaenisch,et al.  In vitro reprogramming of fibroblasts into a pluripotent ES-cell-like state , 2007, Nature.

[38]  S. Yamanaka,et al.  Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors , 2006, Cell.

[39]  C. Kai,et al.  CAGE: cap analysis of gene expression , 2006, Nature Methods.

[40]  D. Haussler,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. , 2005, Genome research.

[41]  J. Jurka,et al.  Repbase Update, a database of eukaryotic repetitive elements , 2005, Cytogenetic and Genome Research.