Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen as a surrogate marker for response of hormone-refractory prostate cancer to suramin therapy.

PURPOSE We evaluated the surrogate role of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using prospectively collected information from patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) treated with suramin. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 103 patients were analyzed using survival analysis, exploratory analysis, and regression analysis. RESULTS There was a significant survival difference between groups of patients with a PSA decrease of < or = 0% or greater than 0% (P = .018). There were no significant overall survival differences between groups of patients with PSA decreases less than 50% or > or = 50% and less than 75% or > or = 75%. Tree-based modeling did not define a specific threshold percentage PSA change as a response criterion. For a response of 1-year survival, sensitivity increased (0.91 v 0.69), but specificity decreased (0.37 v 0.62), with a 75% versus 50% PSA decrease used as classification criterion. Differences between the area under the receiver-operating curves (ROCs) with 50% and 75% PSA decreases as threshold values were small. For a response of 1-year survival, attributable proportions were 0.38 and 0.68, respectively, with 50% and 75% PSA decreases as threshold values. When pretreatment variables were assessed by Cox proportional hazards model, hemoglobin level was the most significant predictor of survival. When percentage PSA change was included in the model, hemoglobin level remained the most significant factor, but percentage PSA change was also a weak, but statistically significant, factor. PSA was a weak, but statistically significant, predictor of survival in Cox proportional hazards model with PSA as a time-variant covariate. CONCLUSION Reduction in PSA level has weak prognostic significance with respect to survival in HRPC patients, but, currently, PSA reduction cannot be used as a reliable response criterion to evaluate treatment efficacy in individual patients. Prospective, randomized studies, including prospective measurement of other indices related to symptomatic clinical benefits, are required.

[1]  E. Zuhowski,et al.  Development and validation of a pharmacokinetically based fixed dosing scheme for suramin. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  D. Jodrell,et al.  Phase I and clinical evaluation of a pharmacologically guided regimen of suramin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer. , 1995, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  S. George Statistical considerations and modeling of clinical utility of tumor markers. , 1994, Hematology/oncology clinics of North America.

[4]  D. Jodrell,et al.  Suramin, an Active Drug for Prostate Cancer: Interim Observations in a Phase I Trial , 1993 .

[5]  M Mazumdar,et al.  Prostate-specific antigen as a measure of disease outcome in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  J. Miller,et al.  The clinical usefulness of serum prostate specific antigen after hormonal therapy of metastatic prostate cancer. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[7]  J. Oesterling,et al.  Prostate specific antigen: a critical assessment of the most useful tumor marker for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1991, The Journal of urology.

[8]  S. Dawsey,et al.  Validation of intermediate end points in cancer research. , 1990, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  N. Geller,et al.  Trimetrexate in prostatic cancer: preliminary observations on the use of prostate-specific antigen and acid phosphatase as a marker in measurable hormone-refractory disease. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Prentice Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: definition and operational criteria. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  D. Seigel,et al.  Surrogate endpoints in clinical trials: ophthalmologic disorders. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  J. Herson The use of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials (an introduction to a series of four papers) , 1989 .

[13]  J R Anderson,et al.  Analysis of survival by tumor response. , 1983, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[14]  C. Logothetis,et al.  Doxorubicin, mitomycin-C, and 5-fluorouracil (DMF) in the treatment of metastatic hormonal refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate, with a note on the staging of metastatic prostate cancer. , 1983, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  M H Gail,et al.  Evaluating serial cancer marker studies in patients at risk of recurrent disease. , 1981, Biometrics.

[16]  J. Minna,et al.  Effective treatment of hormonally‐unresponsive metastatic carcinoma of the prostate with adriamycin and cyclophosphamide methods of documenting tumor response and progression , 1980, Cancer.

[17]  W. Haenszel,et al.  Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[19]  J. Swets,et al.  A decision-making theory of visual detection. , 1954, Psychological review.

[20]  D. Jodrell,et al.  Suramin: development of a population pharmacokinetic model and its use with intermittent short infusions to control plasma drug concentration in patients with prostate cancer. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  David R. Cox,et al.  Regression models and life tables (with discussion , 1972 .