Interpolation of Steady‐State Concentration Data by Inverse Modeling

In most groundwater applications, measurements of concentration are limited in number and sparsely distributed within the domain of interest. Therefore, interpolation techniques are needed to obtain most likely values of concentration at locations where no measurements are available. For further processing, for example, in environmental risk analysis, interpolated values should be given with uncertainty bounds, so that a geostatistical framework is preferable. Linear interpolation of steady-state concentration measurements is problematic because the dependence of concentration on the primary uncertain material property, the hydraulic conductivity field, is highly nonlinear, suggesting that the statistical interrelationship between concentration values at different points is also nonlinear. We suggest interpolating steady-state concentration measurements by conditioning an ensemble of the underlying log-conductivity field on the available hydrological data in a conditional Monte Carlo approach. Flow and transport simulations for each conditional conductivity field must meet the measurements within their given uncertainty. The ensemble of transport simulations based on the conditional log-conductivity fields yields conditional statistical distributions of concentration at points between observation points. This method implicitly meets physical bounds of concentration values and non-Gaussianity of their statistical distributions and obeys the nonlinearity of the underlying processes. We validate our method by artificial test cases and compare the results to kriging estimates assuming different conditional statistical distributions of concentration. Assuming a beta distribution in kriging leads to estimates of concentration with zero probability of concentrations below zero or above the maximal possible value; however, the concentrations are not forced to meet the advection-dispersion equation.

[1]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Best unbiased ensemble linearization and the quasi‐linear Kalman ensemble generator , 2009 .

[2]  C. R. Dietrich,et al.  A fast and exact method for multidimensional gaussian stochastic simulations , 1993 .

[3]  Ted Chang,et al.  Introduction to Geostatistics: Applications in Hydrogeology , 2001, Technometrics.

[4]  Virgilio Fiorotto,et al.  Solute Concentration Statistics in Heterogeneous Aquifers for Finite Péclet Values , 2002 .

[5]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Efficient Computation of Linearized Cross-Covariance and Auto-Covariance Matrices of Interdependent Quantities , 2003 .

[6]  Olaf A. Cirpka,et al.  Use of steady-state concentration measurements in geostatistical inversion , 2009 .

[7]  E. Caroni,et al.  Analysis of Concentration as Sampled in Natural Aquifers , 2022 .

[8]  Michael D. Dettinger,et al.  First order analysis of uncertainty in numerical models of groundwater flow part: 1. Mathematical development , 1981 .

[9]  P. Kitanidis Quasi‐Linear Geostatistical Theory for Inversing , 1995 .

[10]  C. R. Dietrich,et al.  Fast and Exact Simulation of Stationary Gaussian Processes through Circulant Embedding of the Covariance Matrix , 1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Large-Time Spatial Covariance of Concentration of Conservative Solute and Application to the Cape Cod Tracer Test , 2001 .

[12]  M. Kobr,et al.  A Simple Borehole Dilution Technique in Measuring Horizontal Ground Water Flow , 2007, Ground water.

[13]  G. Dagan Solute transport in heterogeneous porous formations , 1984, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[14]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  First‐order variance of travel time in nonstationary formations , 2004 .

[15]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling - 1. Sensitivity analysis and parameter identification. , 1990 .

[16]  B. Minsker,et al.  Spatial Interpolation Methods for Nonstationary Plume Data , 2004, Ground water.

[17]  P. Kitanidis,et al.  Geostatistical interpolation of chemical concentration , 1996 .

[18]  H. Johnson,et al.  A comparison of 'traditional' and multimedia information systems development practices , 2003, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[19]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Coupled inverse problems in groundwater modeling: 2. Identifiability and experimental design , 1990 .

[20]  R. Borden Effective distribution of emulsified edible oil for enhanced anaerobic bioremediation. , 2007, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[21]  A. Scheidegger General Theory of Dispersion in Porous Media , 1961 .

[22]  P. Kitanidis Parameter Uncertainty in Estimation of Spatial Functions: Bayesian Analysis , 1986 .

[23]  Dietmar Klotz,et al.  Point dilution methods of investigating ground water flow by means of radioisotopes , 1968 .

[24]  Carl D. Palmer Borehole dilution tests in the vicinity of an extraction well , 1993 .

[25]  Harald Kunstmann,et al.  Conditional first‐order second‐moment method and its application to the quantification of uncertainty in groundwater modeling , 2002 .

[26]  Peter K. Kitanidis,et al.  Sensitivity of temporal moments calculated by the adjoint-state method and joint inversing of head and tracer data , 2000 .

[27]  C. Axness,et al.  Three‐dimensional stochastic analysis of macrodispersion in aquifers , 1983 .

[28]  Wei Li,et al.  Three‐Dimensional Geostatistical Inversion of Flowmeter and Pumping Test Data , 2008, Ground water.

[29]  W. Nowak,et al.  A modified Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for quasi-linear geostatistical inversing , 2004 .

[30]  E. G. Vomvoris,et al.  A geostatistical approach to the inverse problem in groundwater modeling (steady state) and one‐dimensional simulations , 1983 .

[31]  Alberto Bellin,et al.  Probability density function of non-reactive solute concentration in heterogeneous porous formations. , 2007, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[32]  M. Marietta,et al.  Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields: 1. Theory and Computational Experiments , 1995 .

[33]  Sean Hatch,et al.  Joint conditional simulations and the spectral approach for flow modeling , 1994 .

[34]  W. Li,et al.  Two‐dimensional characterization of hydraulic heterogeneity by multiple pumping tests , 2007 .

[35]  Charles F. Harvey,et al.  Temporal Moment‐Generating Equations: Modeling Transport and Mass Transfer in Heterogeneous Aquifers , 1995 .

[36]  Wolfgang Nowak,et al.  Impact of sampling volume on the probability density function of steady state concentration , 2008 .

[37]  A. Sahuquillo,et al.  Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data—I. Theory , 1997 .

[38]  E. Caroni,et al.  Analysis of Concentration as Sampled in , 2005 .

[39]  N. L. Jones,et al.  A Comparison of Three‐Dimensional Interpolation Techniques for Plume Characterization , 2003, Ground water.

[40]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Stochastic theory of field‐scale fickian dispersion in anisotropic porous media , 1987 .

[41]  W. F. Merritt,et al.  A fluoride borehole dilution apparatus for groundwater velocity measurements , 1977 .

[42]  K. Novakowski,et al.  Measurements of groundwater velocity in discrete rock fractures. , 2006, Journal of contaminant hydrology.