Systematic geometric rigid body error identification of 5-axis milling machines

A 5-axis milling machine has 39 independent geometric error components when the machine tool is considered as a set of five rigid bodies. The identification of the deterministic component of the systematic error is very important. It permits one to improve the accuracy close to the repeatability of the machine tool. This paper gives a new way to identify and compensate all the systematic angular errors separately and then use them further to identify the systematic translational error. Identification based on a new mathematical method and a stable numerical solution method is proposed. The model explains from first principles why some error components have no effect in a first order model. The identification of the total angular systematic errors can be done independently from the translation errors. However, the total translation error depends on the angular errors and the translation errors of each machine tool slide. The main problems solved are to find enough linear independent equations and avoid numerical instability in the computation. It is important to separate numerical problems and linear dependence. The very complex equations are first analyzed in symbolic form to eliminate the linear dependencies. The total of linear independent components in the model is reduced from 30 to 26 for the position dependent errors and from 9 to 3 for the position independent components. Secondly, the large system of linear equations is broken down in many smaller systems. The model is tested first with simulated errors modeled as cubic polynomials. An artifact-based identification is proposed and implemented based on drilling holes in various locations and orientations. New ways to measure the volumetric error directly are proposed. Direct measurement of the total volumetric error requires considerably less measurement than measuring all 6 components of each machine slide especially in the case of a 5-axis machine.

[1]  C. R. Liu,et al.  A methodology for machine tools error correction using reference parts , 1995 .

[2]  W. T. Lei,et al.  Accuracy enhancement of five-axis CNC machines through real-time error compensation , 2003 .

[3]  R.M.D. Mahbubur,et al.  Positioning accuracy improvement in five-axis milling by post processing , 1997 .

[4]  Stephen T. Newman,et al.  Manufacturing data analysis of machine tool errors within a contemporary small manufacturing enterprise , 2002 .

[5]  Guy Cloutier,et al.  Theory and simulation for the identification of the link geometric errors for a five-axis machine tool using a telescoping magnetic ball-bar , 2002 .

[6]  J. Mou,et al.  A method for enhancing the accuracy of CNC machine tools for on-machine inspection , 1992 .

[7]  Stephen C. Veldhuis,et al.  Modelling geometric and thermal errors in a five-axis cnc machine tool , 1995 .

[8]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  Kinematic modeling of quasistatic errors of three-axis machining centers , 1994 .

[9]  Yuan Kang,et al.  An efficient error compensation system for CNC multi-axis machines , 2002 .

[10]  Enrico Canuto,et al.  Coordinate Measuring Machines and Machine Tools Selfcalibration and Error Correction , 1987 .

[11]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  L∞ Parameter estimates for volumetric error in models of machine tools , 1997 .

[12]  Masaomi Tsutsumi,et al.  Identification and compensation of systematic deviations particular to 5-axis machining centers , 2003 .

[13]  van de Mjg René Molengraft,et al.  Assessing geometrical errors of multi-axis machines by three-dimensional length measurements , 2001 .

[14]  W. T. Lei,et al.  Accuracy test of five-axis CNC machine tool with 3D probe-ball. Part I: Design and modeling , 2002 .

[15]  Aun-Neow Poo,et al.  Thermal error measurement and modelling in machine tools.: Part I. Influence of varying operating conditions , 2003 .

[16]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  Parameter estimation and model verification of first order quasistatic error model for three-axis machining centers , 1994 .

[17]  Aun-Neow Poo,et al.  Thermal error measurement and modelling in machine tools. Part II. Hybrid Bayesian Network—support vector machine model , 2003 .

[18]  J. W. Humberston Classical mechanics , 1980, Nature.

[19]  Arne Novak,et al.  Compensation of systematic errors in five-axis high-speed machining , 2002 .

[20]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  Computational approaches to compensating quasistatic errors of three-axis machining centers , 1994 .

[21]  Hsi-Yung Feng,et al.  Configuration analysis of five-axis machine tools using a generic kinematic model , 2004 .

[22]  Manfred Weck,et al.  Handbook of machine tools , 1984 .

[23]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  Auto-triangulation and auto-trilateration. Part 1. Fundamentals , 2002 .

[24]  A. Geddam,et al.  Accuracy improvement of three-axis CNC machining centers by quasi-static error compensation , 1997 .

[25]  Y. Lin,et al.  Modelling of Five-Axis Machine Tool Metrology Models Using the Matrix Summation Approach , 2003 .

[26]  J. A. Soons,et al.  Modeling the errors of multi-axis machines : a general methodology , 1992 .

[27]  Joost Duflou,et al.  A geometric modeling and five-axis machining algorithm for centrifugal impellers , 1997 .

[28]  W. T. Lei,et al.  Accuracy test of five-axis CNC machine tool with 3D probe-ball. Part II: errors estimation , 2002 .

[29]  Erik L.J. Bohez,et al.  Compensating for systematic errors in 5-axis NC machining , 2002, Comput. Aided Des..

[30]  Placid Mathew Ferreira,et al.  Auto-triangulation and auto-trilateration: Part 2: Three-dimensional experimental verification , 2002 .

[31]  Jean-Pierre Kruth,et al.  Self-calibration method and software error correction for three dimensional coordinate measuring machines using artefact measurements , 1994 .

[32]  Anjani Kumar,et al.  Analysis of geometric errors associated with five-axis machining centre in improving the quality of cam profile , 2003 .