A practitioner's perspective on the application and research needs of membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment.

The application of membrane bioreactors (MBRs) for municipal wastewater treatment has increased dramatically over the last decade. From a practitioner's perspective, design practice has evolved over five "generations" in the areas of biological process optimization, separating process design from equipment supply, and reliability/redundancy thereby facilitating "large" MBRs (e.g. 150,000 m(3)/day). MBR advantages and disadvantages, and process design to accommodate biological nutrient removal, high mixed liquor suspended solids concentrations, operation and maintenance, peak flows, and procurement are reviewed from the design practitioner's perspective. Finally, four knowledge areas are identified as important to practitioners meriting further research and development: (i) membrane design and performance such as improving peak flow characteristics and decreasing operating costs; (ii) process design and performance such as managing the fluid properties of the biological solids, disinfection, and microcontaminant removal; (iii) facility design such as equipment standardization and decreasing mechanical complexity; and (iv) sustainability such as anaerobic MBRs.

[1]  George Crawford,et al.  Best Practices for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment: Initial Case Study Incorporating European Experience and Evaluation Tool Concept , 2010 .

[2]  M. V. van Loosdrecht,et al.  The membrane bioreactor: A novel tool to grow anammox bacteria as free cells , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  Christoph Brepols,et al.  Operating Large Scale Membrane Bioreactors for Municipal Wastewater Treatment , 2010 .

[4]  G. Daigger,et al.  MEMBRANE BIOREACTORS - A DESIGNER'S PERSPECTIVE , 2000 .

[5]  Larry S. Hager.  Membrane systems for wastewater treatment , 2013 .

[6]  D. Bagley,et al.  A Review of Biofouling and its Control in Membrane Separation Bioreactors , 2004, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[7]  Simon Judd,et al.  The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR. , 2010, Water research.

[8]  G. Daigger,et al.  Critical Review on the Effects of Mixed Liquor Suspended Solids on Membrane Bioreactor Operation , 2006 .

[9]  Christian Larroche,et al.  Immersed membrane bioreactors: an overview with special emphasis on anaerobic bioprocesses. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[10]  T. Leiknes,et al.  The biofilm membrane bioreactor (BF-MBR)—a review , 2012 .

[11]  Simon Judd,et al.  The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment , 2006 .

[12]  Graeme Pearce,et al.  Introduction to membranes: An introduction to membrane bioreactors , 2008 .

[13]  A. Drews,et al.  Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. , 2009, Water research.

[14]  David M. Bagley,et al.  Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactors: Applications and Research Directions , 2006 .

[15]  Simon Judd,et al.  The fate of metals in wastewater treated by the activated sludge process and membrane bioreactors: a brief review. , 2010, Journal of environmental monitoring : JEM.

[16]  Kevin C. Eberle,et al.  Innovative MBR Technology Solves Coastal Development Challenge , 2007 .

[17]  Simon Judd,et al.  Membrane bioreactors: Two decades of research and implementation , 2011 .

[18]  M. Stefanski,et al.  The determination and origin of fibre clogging in membrane bioreactors , 2011 .