Materials’ tactile testing and characterisation for consumer products’ affective packaging design

Touch is one sense through which people judge consumer products. How materials’ properties influence these judgments is the topic of this paper. People’s sensorial or psycho-physical judgments (by touch) of the roughness, softness, slipperiness and warmth of 37 material samples are reported as well as their affective judgments, such as how pleasurable, exciting, indulgent, the samples felt. Physical measurements are also reported of the samples’ coarse and fine surface finishes, compliance, sliding friction and thermal contact properties. Relationships between the affective and sensorial judgments and the physical measurements are explored. A relational hierarchy is established from the physical measurements to the sensorial to the affective judgements. By following the dependencies in reverse, from the affective to the sensorial to the physical level, the required material surface properties to transmit intended affective messages to consumers might be determined. However, further work is needed on how to quantify some aspects of surface properties, particularly of roughness and sliding friction, in a manner useful for relating to affect. The methods described currently support communication and decision taking during the product development process.

[1]  Yi Li,et al.  Fabric Touch Tester: Integrated evaluation of thermal–mechanical sensory properties of polymeric materials , 2006 .

[2]  M. Alexander,et al.  Principles of Neural Science , 1981 .

[3]  K. L. Edwards,et al.  Design, materials selection and marketing of successful products , 2003 .

[4]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Role of friction and tangential force variation in the subjective scaling of tactile roughness , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Kyungmee Choi,et al.  A systematic approach to the Kansei factors of tactile sense regarding the surface roughness. , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  Mark Holliins,et al.  Perceptual dimensions of tactile surface texture: A multidimensional scaling analysis , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  M. J. Norušis,et al.  SPSS 13.0 Guide to Data Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  Brian Henson,et al.  Kansei engineering toolkit for the packaging industry , 2008 .

[9]  G. Ekman,et al.  ROUGHNESS, SMOOTHNESS, AND PREFERENCE: A STUDY OF QUANTITATIVE RELATIONS IN INDIVIDUAL SUBJECTS. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  I. E. H. van Kesteren Product designers’ information needs in materials selection , 2008 .

[11]  D. Valentin,et al.  Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[12]  Derek G. Chetwynd,et al.  Quantifying touch–feel perception: tribological aspects , 2008 .

[13]  C. J. Barnes,et al.  Affective design decision-making—issues and opportunities , 2007 .

[14]  Elvin Karana,et al.  Material considerations in product design: A survey on crucial material aspects used by product designers , 2007 .

[15]  Brian Henson,et al.  Surface finish and touch: a case study in a new human factors tribology , 2004 .

[16]  A. Kappers,et al.  Analysis of haptic perception of materials by multidimensional scaling and physical measurements of roughness and compressibility. , 2006, Acta psychologica.

[17]  G. Ekman,et al.  Saltness, sweetness, and preference. A study of quantitative relations in individual subjects. , 1965, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[18]  R. Postle,et al.  Objective specification of fabric quality, mechanical properties and performance , 1982 .

[19]  P. Hekkert,et al.  Meanings of materials through sensorial properties and manufacturing processes , 2009 .

[20]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development , 1995 .

[21]  P. Green,et al.  Analyzing multivariate data , 1978 .

[22]  David Cebon,et al.  Selection strategies for materials and processes , 2002 .

[23]  B Henson,et al.  Human tactile perception of screen-printed surfaces: Self-report and contact mechanics experiments , 2007 .

[24]  A. Maslow Motivation and Personality , 1954 .

[25]  E. Strazdienė,et al.  New Method for the Objective Evaluation of Textile Hand , 2005 .

[26]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Individual differences in perceptual space for tactile textures: Evidence from multidimensional scaling , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  N. Kano,et al.  Attractive Quality and Must-Be Quality , 1984 .

[28]  Mark Hollins,et al.  The coding of roughness. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[29]  MariAnne Karlsson,et al.  Designing for the tactile sense: investigating the relation between surface properties, perceptions and preferences , 2007 .

[30]  Yukihiro Matsubara,et al.  An analysis of Kansei structure on shoes using self-organizing neural networks , 1997 .

[31]  M. Kringelbach The human orbitofrontal cortex: linking reward to hedonic experience , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.