Increasing LSPIV performances by exploiting the seeding distribution index at different spatial scales

Abstract Image-based approaches for surface velocity estimations are becoming increasingly popular because of the increasing need for low-cost river flow monitoring methods. In this context, seeding characteristics and dynamics along the video footage represent one of the key variables influencing image velocimetry results. Recent studies highlight the need to identify parameter settings based on local flow conditions and environmental factors apriori, making the use of image velocimetry approaches hard to automatise for continuous monitoring. The seeding distribution index (SDI) – recently introduced by the authors – identifies the best frame window length of a video to analyse, reducing the computational loads and improving image velocimetry performance. In this work, we propose a method based on an average SDI time series threshold with noise filtering. This method was tested on three case studies in Italy and validated on one in the UK, where a relatively high number of measurements was available. Following this method, we observed an error reduction of 20-39% with respect to the analysis of the full video. This beneficial effect appears even more evident when the optimisation is applied at sub-sector scales, in cases where the SDI shows a marked variability along the cross-section. Finally, an empirical parameter τ was proposed, calibrated, and validated for practical uses to define the SDI threshold. τ, showed relatively stable values in the different contexts where it has been applied. Application of the seeding index to image-based velocimetry for surface flow velocity estimates is likely to enhance measurement accuracy in future studies.

[1]  Wernher Brevis,et al.  Integrating cross-correlation and relaxation algorithms for particle tracking velocimetry , 2011 .

[2]  Jana Müllerová,et al.  Assessing the Accuracy of Digital Surface Models Derived from Optical Imagery Acquired with Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2019, Drones.

[3]  Jens Grundmann,et al.  Technical Note: Flow velocity and discharge measurement in rivers using terrestrial and unmanned-aerial-vehicle imagery , 2020 .

[4]  Matthew T Perks,et al.  Identifying the optimal spatial distribution of tracers for optical sensing of stream surface flow , 2020 .

[5]  Salvatore Manfreda,et al.  An Evaluation of Image Velocimetry Techniques under Low Flow Conditions and High Seeding Densities Using Unmanned Aerial Systems , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[6]  A. Fouras,et al.  Optimisation of temporal averaging processes in PIV , 2012 .

[7]  Witold F. Krajewski,et al.  Stream discharge using mobile large‐scale particle image velocimetry: A proof of concept , 2008 .

[8]  Volker Weitbrecht,et al.  Proof‐of‐concept for low‐cost and non‐contact synoptic airborne river flow measurements , 2017 .

[9]  Anton Kruger,et al.  Large-scale particle image velocimetry for flow analysis in hydraulic engineering applications , 1998 .

[10]  Marian Muste,et al.  Large‐scale particle image velocimetry for measurements in riverine environments , 2008 .

[11]  Salvatore Manfreda,et al.  Metrics for the Quantification of Seeding Characteristics to Enhance Image Velocimetry Performance in Rivers , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Carl J. Legleiter,et al.  sUAS-Based Remote Sensing of River Discharge Using Thermal Particle Image Velocimetry and Bathymetric Lidar , 2019, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Ichiro Fujita,et al.  Development of a non‐intrusive and efficient flow monitoring technique: The space‐time image velocimetry (STIV) , 2007 .

[14]  Flavia Tauro,et al.  Streamflow Observations From Cameras: Large‐Scale Particle Image Velocimetry or Particle Tracking Velocimetry? , 2017 .

[15]  Giorgos Mallinis,et al.  On the Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems for Environmental Monitoring , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[16]  Andreas Scheidegger,et al.  Urban overland runoff velocity measurement with consumer-grade surveillance cameras and surface structure image velocimetry , 2018, Journal of Hydrology.

[17]  C. Borst,et al.  A Drone‐Borne Method to Jointly Estimate Discharge and Manning's Roughness of Natural Streams , 2020, Water Resources Research.

[18]  Vladimir Nikora Streamflow measurement , 2011 .

[19]  Stefano Mattoccia,et al.  Optical Tracking Velocimetry (OTV): Leveraging Optical Flow and Trajectory-Based Filtering for Surface Streamflow Observations , 2018, Remote. Sens..

[20]  Jérôme Le Coz,et al.  Gauging extreme floods on YouTube: application of LSPIV to home movies for the post‐event determination of stream discharges , 2016 .

[21]  Panayiotis Dimitriadis,et al.  On the Uncertainty of the Image Velocimetry Method Parameters , 2020, Hydrology.

[22]  William Thielicke,et al.  PIVlab – Towards User-friendly, Affordable and Accurate Digital Particle Image Velocimetry in MATLAB , 2014 .

[23]  Jérôme Le Coz,et al.  Towards harmonisation of image velocimetry techniques for river surface velocity observations , 2019, Earth System Science Data.

[24]  Matthew T Perks,et al.  KLT-IV v1.0: image velocimetry software for use with fixed and mobile platforms , 2020 .

[25]  S. Manfreda,et al.  Exploring the optimal experimental setup for surface flow velocity measurements using PTV , 2018, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

[26]  Karl-Heinrich Anders,et al.  Drone-Based Optical Measurements of Heterogeneous Surface Velocity Fields around Fish Passages at Hydropower Dams , 2020, Remote. Sens..

[27]  Guillaume Dramais,et al.  Performance of image-based velocimetry (LSPIV) applied to flash-flood discharge measurements in Mediterranean rivers. , 2010 .

[28]  Stefano Mattoccia,et al.  Enabling Image-Based Streamflow Monitoring at the Edge , 2020, Remote. Sens..