Seismic fragility assessment of infilled frames subject to mainshock/aftershock sequences using a double incremental dynamic analysis approach

The paper presents an assessment framework aimed at evaluating seismic fragility and residual capacity of masonry infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frames subject to mainshock/aftershock sequences. A double incremental dynamic analysis (D-IDA) approach is used, based on the combination of a mainshock (MS) signal at different intensities with a set of spectrum-compatible aftershocks (AS) scaled in amplitude with respect to peak ground acceleration. Limit state functions, specifically defined for infilled frames, are used to detect chord-rotation exceeding and shear collapse of RC members during standard and double incremental dynamic analyses. Intact and aftershock fragility curves are obtained for a reference full-scale RC frame specimen, by simulating seismic response with and without infills through a fully fiber section model developed in OpenSees. D-IDA results allow also defining aftershock residual capacity domains and loss diagrams, which are used to compare responses of bare and infilled frames subject to increasing MS intensities. Results show that masonry infills can drastically reduce seismic fragility of RC frame structures during main events and AS, and also limit and economic losses for the mid-low intensity earthquakes. Such beneficial contributions, however, depend on the capacity of RC members to support additional shear demand due frame-infill interaction and avoid sudden failures which conversely occur.

[1]  L. Cavaleri,et al.  Definition of diagonal Poisson’s ratio and elastic modulus for infill masonry walls , 2014 .

[2]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Numerical modelling of out-of-plane response of infilled frames: State of the art and future challenges for the equivalent strut macromodels , 2017 .

[3]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Seismic safety evaluation of reinforced concrete masonry infilled frames using macro modelling approach , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[4]  Nicolas Luco,et al.  Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures , 2015 .

[5]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Seismic sequence effects on three-dimensional reinforced concrete buildings , 2015 .

[6]  Marco Preti,et al.  Numerical Investigation of the In-Plane Performance of Masonry-Infilled RC Frames with Sliding Subpanels , 2017 .

[7]  L. Cavaleri,et al.  Macroelement Model for In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Responses of Masonry Infills in Frame Structures , 2018 .

[8]  Marco Preti,et al.  Masonry infill construction and retrofit technique for the infill-frame interaction mitigation: Test results , 2017 .

[9]  M. L. Beconcini Costruzioni in zona sismica : con riferimento alle norme tecniche per le costruzioni DM 14.01.2008 , 2013 .

[10]  Amorim Varum Humberto Seismic Assessment, Strengthening and Repair of Existing Buildings , 2003 .

[11]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Prediction of the Fundamental Period of Infilled RC Frame Structures Using Artificial Neural Networks , 2015, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[12]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Cyclic response of masonry infilled RC frames: Experimental results and simplified modeling , 2014 .

[13]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility of lightly reinforced concrete frames with masonry infills , 2015 .

[14]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Frictional Effects in Structural Behavior of No-End-Connected Steel-Jacketed RC Columns: Experimental Results and New Approaches to Model Numerical and Analytical Response , 2017 .

[15]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Influence of column shear failure on pushover based assessment of masonry infilled reinforced concrete framed structures: A case study , 2017 .

[16]  Gabriele Bertagnoli,et al.  Empirical Equations for the Direct Definition of Stress–Strain Laws for Fiber-Section-Based Macromodeling of Infilled Frames , 2018, Journal of Engineering Mechanics.

[17]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame — a deterministic assessment , 2008 .

[18]  George D. Hatzigeorgiou,et al.  Nonlinear behaviour of RC frames under repeated strong ground motions , 2010 .

[19]  Wael W. El-Dakhakhni,et al.  THREE-STRUT MODEL FOR CONCRETE MASONRY-INFILLED STEEL FRAMES , 2003 .

[20]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Biaxial deformation and ductility domains for engineered rectangular RC cross-sections: A parametric study highlighting the positive roles of axial load, geometry and materials , 2016 .

[21]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  A macro-modelling approach for the analysis of infilled frame structures considering the effects of openings and vertical loads , 2016 .

[22]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Prediction of the additional shear action on frame members due to infills , 2014, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[23]  L. Di Sarno,et al.  Effects of multiple earthquakes on inelastic structural response , 2013 .

[24]  Lorenzo Macorini,et al.  Seismic response of steel frames under repeated earthquake ground motions , 2004 .

[25]  L. Cavaleri,et al.  Evaluation of infilled frames: an updated in-plane-stiffness macro-model considering the effects of vertical loads , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[26]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[27]  F. Hosseinpour,et al.  Fragility curves for RC frames under multiple earthquakes , 2017 .

[28]  Adel E. Abdelnaby,et al.  Effect of different aspects of multiple earthquakes on the nonlinear behavior of RC structures , 2017 .

[29]  Luís C. Neves,et al.  Application of Reliability-Based Robustness Assessment of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures under Post-Mainshock Cascading Events , 2014 .

[30]  F. Mazzolani,et al.  Design of Steel Structures for Buildings in Seismic Areas: Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1-1 - General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings , 2017 .

[31]  Matjaž Dolšek,et al.  Practice‐oriented probabilistic seismic performance assessment of infilled frames with consideration of shear failure of columns , 2013 .

[32]  Claudio Amadio,et al.  The effects of repeated earthquake ground motions on the non‐linear response of SDOF systems , 2003 .

[33]  Liborio Cavaleri,et al.  Masonry infills and RC frames interaction: literature overview and state of the art of macromodeling approach , 2015 .

[34]  J. V. D. Lindt,et al.  Collapse Fragility of Steel Structures Subjected to Earthquake Mainshock-Aftershock Sequences , 2014 .