Outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic repair of small-sized ventral hernias

IntroductionThe aim of the study is to investigate the outcomes of the da Vinci robot-assisted laparoscopic hernia repair of small-sized ventral hernias with circumferential suturing of the mesh compared to the traditional laparoscopic repair with trans-fascial suturing.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of all robot-assisted umbilical, epigastric and incisional hernia repairs performed at our institution between 2013 and 2015 compared to laparoscopic umbilical or epigastric hernia repairs. Patient characteristics, operative details and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed using univariate analysis. Three primary minimally invasive fellowship trained surgeons performed all of the procedures included in the analysis.Results72 patients were identified during the study period. 39 patients underwent robot- assisted repair (21 umbilical, 14 epigastric, 4 incisional), and 33 patients laparoscopic repair (27 umbilical, 6 epigastric). Seven had recurrent hernias (robot: 4, laparoscopic: 3). There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics between the two groups. Average operative time was 156 min for robot-assisted repair and 65 min for laparoscopic repair (p < 0.0001). The average defect size was significantly larger for the robot group [3.07 cm (1–9 cm)] than that for the laparoscopic group [2.02 cm (0.5–5 cm)] (p < 0.0001), although there was no significant difference in the average size of mesh used (13 vs. 13 cm). There was no difference in patients requiring postoperative admission or length of stay between the two groups. The mean duration of follow-up was 47 days. There was no difference in complication rate during this time, and no recurrences were reported.ConclusionThere are no significant differences in terms of safety and early efficacy when comparing small-sized ventral hernias repaired using the robot-assisted technique versus the standard laparoscopic repair.

[1]  L. Hughes,et al.  Incisional hernia: A 10 year prospective study of incidence and attitudes , 1985, The British journal of surgery.

[2]  K. LeBlanc,et al.  Laparoscopic repair of incisional abdominal hernias using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene: preliminary findings. , 1993, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[3]  Garth H Ballantyne,et al.  The pitfalls of laparoscopic surgery: challenges for robotics and telerobotic surgery. , 2002, Surgical laparoscopy, endoscopy & percutaneous techniques.

[4]  A. E. Park,et al.  The effect of using laparoscopic instruments on muscle activation patterns during minimally invasive surgical training procedures , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[5]  Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of ventral hernia with intracorporeal suturing , 2003, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[6]  K. LeBlanc.  Laparoscopic Incisional and Ventral Hernioplasty , 2003 .

[7]  G. Ballantyne,et al.  Telerobotic Laparoscopic Repair of Incisional Ventral Hernias Using Intraperitoneal Prosthetic Mesh , 2003, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[8]  K. LeBlanc.  Laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: Complications—how to avoid and handle , 2004, Hernia.

[9]  F. Pirozzi,et al.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[10]  D. Candinas,et al.  Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is safe and cost effective , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[11]  M. Thoma,et al.  The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernia repair: Mid-term analysis of 400 cases , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  P. Fagniez,et al.  Robot-assisted laparoscopic mesh repair of incisional hernias with exclusive intracorporeal suturing: a pilot study , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  E. Misiakos,et al.  Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: Pros and Cons Compared With Open Hernia Repair , 2008, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[14]  E. Schoenmaeckers,et al.  Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques , 2009, Surgical Endoscopy.

[15]  D. Candinas,et al.  Mesh shrinkage and pain in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: a randomized clinical trial comparing suture versus tack mesh fixation , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  D. Reda,et al.  Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair with mesh for the treatment of ventral incisional hernia: a randomized trial. , 2010, Archives of surgery.

[17]  A. Pigazzi,et al.  Technical Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair , 2012, World Journal of Surgery.

[18]  Rafael Izar Domingues da Costa,et al.  [Modified robot assisted Rives/Stoppa videosurgery for midline ventral hernia repair]. , 2012, Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery.

[19]  Ricardo Zugaib Abdalla,et al.  Procedimento de Rives/Stoppa modificado robô-assistido para correção de hernias ventrais da linha média , 2012 .

[20]  J. Lange,et al.  The INCH-Trial: a multicentre randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy of conventional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery for incisional hernia repair , 2013, BMC Surgery.

[21]  G. Choi,et al.  Comparison of Surgical Skills in Laparoscopic and Robotic Tasks Between Experienced Surgeons and Novices in Laparoscopic Surgery: An Experimental Study , 2014, Annals of coloproctology.

[22]  N. Zavras,et al.  Current Trends in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair , 2015, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[23]  M. Pera,et al.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: Current status and implementation of the latest technological innovations. , 2016, World journal of gastroenterology.