Preparation of ASA (acrylonitrile-styrene-acrylate) structural latexes via seeded emulsion polymerization

Abstract Acrylonitrile-styrene-acrylate (ASA) structural latexes were synthesized in a two-stage seeded emulsion polymerization. In the first-stage, partially cross-linked poly ( n -butyl acrylate) (P n BA) and poly ( n -butyl acrylate-stat-2-ethyl hexyl acrylate) P ( n BA-stat-2EHA) (75/25 by wt) rubber cores were synthesized, and then in the second-stage, a hard poly (styrene-stat-acrylonitrile) (SAN) (70/30 by wt) shell was grafted on to the rubber seeds. The effects of surfactant type and second-stage monomer addition mode have been investigated on the final morphology of two-stage emulsion particles. The results indicated that an application of anionic surfactant, that is, sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS), along with sodium persulfate (KPS) initiator for both stages, and with first-stage tert -butyl hydroperoxide ( t -BHP) and second-stage KPS initiators led to a hemisphere particle morphology. On the other hand, raspberry and core–shell structures were observed for the structural latexes, which were prepared using a non-ionic surfactant, that is, nonylphenol ethoxylated polyethylene glycol (Igepal CO-850), accompanying KPS initiator for both stages. It is clear, however, that the relative surface hydrophilicity of the core phase, altered by the surfactant type considerably affected the type of morphology formed. For obtained structural latexes, the gradual addition of the second-stage monomers to the core latexes resulted in a fairly real core–shell structure with a higher shell thickness. On the contrary, a raspberry structure in which the rubber phase was enlarged by the second-stage polymer microdomains was observed for the second-stage monomer addition batch. In fact, the shell semi-batch polymerization conditions lower the shell plasticizing effect, and increase the kinetic barrier to prevent from further second-stage monomer diffusion and microdomain formation within the rubbery phase.

[1]  Chia-Fen Lee Effects of surfactants on the morphology of composite polymer particles produced by two-stage seeded emulsion polymerization , 2005 .

[2]  Guangfeng Wu,et al.  The influence of core–shell structured modifiers on the toughness of poly (vinyl chloride) , 2004 .

[3]  I. Cho,et al.  Morphology of latex particles formed by poly(methyl methacrylate)-seeded emulsion polymerization of styrene , 1985 .

[4]  D. Sundberg,et al.  Nonequilibrium particle morphology development in seeded emulsion polymerization. III. Effect of initiator end groups , 2004 .

[5]  J. Vanderhoff,et al.  Morphology and grafting reactions in core/shell latexes , 1987 .

[6]  Hyungsun Kim,et al.  Effect of acrylonitrile content on the toughness of ABS materials , 1991 .

[7]  H. Hassander,et al.  Polymerization Conditions and the Development of a Core-Shell Morphology in PMMA/PS Latex Particles. 1. Influence of Initiator Properties and Mode of Monomer Addition , 1994 .

[8]  M. El-Aasser,et al.  Preparation and characterization of poly(butadiene‐stat‐styrene)/poly(styrene‐stat‐acrylonitrile) structured latex particles , 1997 .

[9]  K. Landfester,et al.  Characterization of Interphases in Core-Shell Latexes by Solid-State NMR , 1998 .

[10]  A. Rudin,et al.  The mechanism of core–shell inversion in two‐stage latexes , 1992 .

[11]  Donald C. Sundberg,et al.  Non-equilibrium particle morphology development in seeded emulsion polymerization. 1: penetration of monomer and radicals as a function of monomer feed rate during second stage polymerization , 1999 .

[12]  Hyungsun Kim,et al.  Toughening of SAN copolymers by an SAN emulsion grafted rubber , 1990 .

[13]  Jia-Horng Wu,et al.  Toughening of Unsaturated Polyester Resins with Core-Shell Rubbers , 2008 .

[14]  C. Zukoski,et al.  The formation of small scale granularities in latex particles , 1985 .

[15]  T. Duc,et al.  Surface Morphology of Poly(butyl acrylate)/Poly(methyl methacrylate) Core Shell Latex by Atomic Force Microscopy , 1995 .

[16]  I. Krieger,et al.  Emulsifier‐free emulsion polymerization with cationic comonomer , 1976 .

[17]  A. Rudin Practical methods to control morphology of heterogeneous polymer particles , 1995 .

[18]  J. Vanderhoff,et al.  Morphology and grafting in polybutylacrylate‐polystyrene core‐shell emulsion polymerization , 1983 .

[19]  O. Karlsson,et al.  Shell-layer stability in core-shell particles prepared with different initiators , 2001 .

[20]  F. Chang,et al.  Effect of the Core-Shell Impact Modifier Shell Thickness on Toughening PVC , 2004 .

[21]  H. Sue Study of rubber‐modified brittle epoxy systems. Part I: Fracture toughness measurements using the double‐notch four‐point‐bend method , 1991 .

[22]  J. Vanderhoff,et al.  Core‐shell emulsion copolymerization of styrene and acrylonitrile on polystyrene seed particles , 1984 .

[23]  S. Kirsch,et al.  Control of particle morphology and film structures of carboxylated poly (n butylacrylate)/poly (methyl methacrylate) composite latex particles , 2001 .

[24]  N. Mohammadi,et al.  Synthesis of SBR/PMMA core/shell latices : The role of initiator and surfactant on particle morphology and instability performance , 2007 .

[25]  J. Asua,et al.  Morphology control in polystyrene/poly(methyl methacrylate) composite latex particles , 2007 .

[26]  G. Moad,et al.  The chemistry of free radical polymerization , 1995 .

[27]  King-Fu Lin,et al.  Core‐shell particles designed for toughening the epoxy resins. II. Core‐shell‐particle‐toughened epoxy resins , 1998 .

[28]  M. El-Aasser,et al.  Morphology, design and characterization of IPN-containing structured latex particles for damping applications , 1999 .

[29]  Saunders,et al.  Microgel Particles as a Matrix for Polymerization: A Study of Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide)-Poly(N-methylpyrrole) Dispersions. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[30]  Reza Bagheri,et al.  Role of blend morphology in rubber-toughened polymers , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.