3D deconvolution of spherically aberrated images using commercial software

Refractive index mismatch between the specimen and the objective immersion oil results in spherical aberration, which causes distortion and spreading of the point spread function, as well as incorrect readings of the axial coordinates. These effects have to be taken into account when performing three‐dimensional restoration of wide‐field fluorescence images. By using objects with well‐defined geometry (fluorescently stained Escherichia coli or actin filaments) separated from a cover slip by a layer of oil with known refractive index, we investigated the accuracy of three‐dimensional shape restoration by the commercial programs Huygens and Autoquant. Aberration correction available in the software dramatically reduced the axial blur compared to deconvolution that ignored the refractive index mismatch. At the same time, it failed to completely recover the cylindrical symmetry of bacteria or of actin fibres, which showed up to a three to five times larger width along the optical axis compared to the lateral plane. The quality of restoration was only moderately sensitive to the exact values of the specimen refractive index but in some cases improved significantly by assuming a reduced NA of the objective. Because image restoration depends on the knowledge of the vertical scale, we also performed detailed measurements of the axial scaling factor and concluded (in agreement with some previous authors) that scaling is adequately described by the simple paraxial formula, even when high‐NA oil‐immersion objectives are used.

[1]  S. Hell,et al.  Aberrations in confocal fluorescence microscopy induced by mismatches in refractive index , 1993 .

[2]  J. Conchello,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging by deconvolution microscopy. , 1999, Methods.

[3]  Mats Ulfendahl,et al.  Image-adaptive deconvolution for three-dimensional deep biological imaging. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[4]  S. Gibson,et al.  Experimental test of an analytical model of aberration in an oil-immersion objective lens used in three-dimensional light microscopy. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[5]  A. Diaspro,et al.  Influence of refractive-index mismatch in high-resolution three-dimensional confocal microscopy. , 2002, Applied optics.

[6]  T. Wilson,et al.  Adaptive aberration correction in a confocal microscope , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  P. Forsgren,et al.  Confocal microscopy: important considerations for accurate imaging. , 2002, Methods in Cell Biology.

[8]  Peter Varga,et al.  The role of specimen‐induced spherical aberration in confocal microscopy , 1997 .

[9]  G. J. Brakenhoff,et al.  Refractive index and axial distance measurements in 3-D microscopy , 1992 .

[10]  Per-Ola Forsgren,et al.  Chapter 3 Confocal Microscopy: Important Considerations for Accurate Imaging , 1993 .

[11]  H. J. van Elburg,et al.  Improved correction of axial geometrical distortion in index‐mismatched fluorescent confocal microscopic images using high‐aperture objective lenses , 2007, Journal of microscopy.

[12]  O. Albert,et al.  Adaptive correction of depth‐induced aberrations in multiphoton scanning microscopy using a deformable mirror , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[13]  K. Neuman,et al.  Measurement of the effective focal shift in an optical trap. , 2005, Optics letters.

[14]  M. Model,et al.  Measurement of the absorption of concentrated dyes and their use for quantitative imaging of surface topography , 2008, Journal of microscopy.

[15]  D. Agard,et al.  Computational adaptive optics for live three-dimensional biological imaging , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  K. Nugent,et al.  Refractive index measurement in viable cells using quantitative phase‐amplitude microscopy and confocal microscopy , 2005, Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology.

[17]  A. He,et al.  Experimental measurement of the refractive index of biological tissues by total internal reflection. , 2005, Applied optics.

[18]  D A Agard,et al.  Dispersion, aberration and deconvolution in multi‐wavelength fluorescence images , 1996, Journal of microscopy.

[19]  Mark D. Fricker,et al.  Aberration control in quantitative imaging of botanical specimens by multidimensional fluorescence microscopy , 1996 .

[20]  C. Sheppard,et al.  Effects of specimen refractive index on confocal imaging , 1997 .

[21]  Kjell Carlsson,et al.  The influence of specimen refractive index, detector signal integration, and non‐uniform scan speed on the imaging properties in confocal microscopy , 1991 .

[22]  W. Decraemer,et al.  Refractive index of tissue measured with confocal microscopy. , 2005, Journal of biomedical optics.

[23]  Frederick Lanni,et al.  Measured and computed point spread functions for an indirect water immersion objective used in three-dimensional fluorescence microscopy , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[24]  M Rajadhyaksha,et al.  Analysis of spherical aberration of a water immersion objective: application to specimens with refractive indices 1.33–1.40 , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[25]  T Wilson,et al.  Strategies for the compensation of specimen‐induced spherical aberration in confocal microscopy of skin , 2000, Journal of microscopy.

[26]  D. Biggs,et al.  A Practical Guide to Deconvolution of Fluorescence Microscope Imagery , 2010, Microscopy Today.

[27]  B. Newby,et al.  Alternative Method for Determining Surface Energy by Utilizing Polymer Thin Film Dewetting , 2003 .