Perceptions : Personality Impressions Based on Personal Websites

This research examined the accuracy of personality impressions based on personal websites, a rapidly growing medium for self-expression, where identity claims are predominant. Eighty-nine websites were viewed by 11 observers, who rated the website authors’ personalities. The ratings were compared with an accuracy criterion (selfand informant reports) and with the authors’ ideal-self ratings. The websites elicited high levels of observer consensus and accuracy, and observers’ impressions were somewhat enhanced for Extraversion and Agreeableness. The accuracy correlations were comparable in magnitude to those found in other contexts of interpersonal perception and generally stronger than those found in zero-acquaintance contexts. These findings suggest that identity claims are used to convey valid information about personality.

[1]  W. Chaplin,et al.  Handshaking, gender, personality, and first impressions. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  D. Funder,et al.  Behavioral manifestations of personality: an ecological approach to judgmental accuracy. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis , 1988 .

[4]  S. Gosling,et al.  Do people know how they behave? Self-reported act frequencies compared with on-line codings by observers. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  M. Leary,et al.  Self-presentation in everyday interactions: effects of target familiarity and gender composition. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  M C Blackman,et al.  Agreement among judges of personality: interpersonal relations, similarity, and acquaintanceship. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the "true self" on the Internet. , 2002 .

[8]  Jack Block,et al.  The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research , 1964 .

[9]  R. Baumeister.  A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[10]  S. Gosling,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES The Do Re Mi’s of Everyday Life: The Structure and Personality Correlates of Music Preferences , 2003 .

[11]  D. Funder,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of personality judgements by the self and knowledgeable others. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[12]  David Jacobson,et al.  Impression Formation in Cyberspace: Online Expectations and Offline Experiences in Text-based Virtual Communities , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[13]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The sounds of social life: a psychometric analysis of students' daily social environments and natural conversations. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  S. Gosling,et al.  Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[15]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[16]  A. Nation.  Online: How Americans Are Expanding Their Use of the Internet , 2002 .

[17]  O. John,et al.  The Quest for Self-Insight: Theory and Research on Accuracy and Bias in Self-Perception , 1997 .

[18]  D. Funder,et al.  Friends and strangers: acquaintanceship, agreement, and the accuracy of personality judgment. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. , 1992 .

[20]  S. Gosling,et al.  A room with a cue: personality judgments based on offices and bedrooms. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Observable Attributesas Manifestations and Cues ofPersonality and Intelligence , 1995 .

[22]  P. Borkenau,et al.  Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings, partner ratings, and measured intelligence. , 1993 .

[23]  S. Gosling,et al.  A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains , 2003 .

[24]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  Constructions and reconstructions of self in virtual reality: Playing in the MUDs , 1994 .

[25]  O. John,et al.  Accuracy and bias in self-perception: individual differences in self-enhancement and the role of narcissism. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Mark Muraven,et al.  When modesty prevails: Differential favorability of self-presentation to friends and strangers. , 1995 .

[27]  P. Markey,et al.  Interpersonal Perception in Internet Chat Rooms , 2002 .

[28]  D'Arcy J. Reynolds,et al.  Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin the Sounds and Sights of Intelligence: a Lens Model Channel Analysis , 2022 .

[29]  W. Hofstee,et al.  Who should own the definition of personality? , 1994 .

[30]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do we know how much people like one another? , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[31]  O. John,et al.  Effects of Visual Perspective and Narcissism on Self-Perception: Is Seeing Believing? , 1997 .

[32]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[33]  C. Sedikides.  Assessment, enhancement, and verification determinants of the self-evaluation process. , 1993 .

[34]  B. Roberts,et al.  Assessing dreams through self-report questionnaires: Relations with past research and personality. , 1995 .

[35]  David C. Funder,et al.  Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. , 1999 .

[36]  Robin M. Kowalski,et al.  Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. , 1990 .

[37]  L. Clark,et al.  Relations between personality traits and self-reports of daily behavior , 2003 .

[38]  Lloyd K. Stires,et al.  Modesty versus Self-Enhancement as Alternative Forms of Ingratiation. , 1969 .

[39]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  杨文秀,et al.  此处“personality”译法探析 , 2000 .

[41]  Alison Cole,et al.  Metaperception in Cyberspace , 2001, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[42]  D. Funder,et al.  Errors and mistakes: evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[43]  E.,et al.  Self-Discrepancy : A Theory Relating Self and Affect , 2022 .

[44]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy in interpersonal perception: a social relations analysis. , 1987, Psychological bulletin.

[45]  D. Berry,et al.  Accuracy in Face Perception: A View from Ecological Psychology , 1993 .

[46]  D. Funder.  On the accuracy of personality judgment: a realistic approach. , 1995, Psychological review.

[47]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Plan 9 From Cyberspace: The Implications of the Internet for Personality and Social Psychology , 2000 .

[48]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Accuracy of Behavioral Predictions at Zero Acquaintance: A Social Relations Analysis , 1993 .

[49]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  Consequences of the Internet for self and society : is social life being transformed? , 2002 .

[50]  D. Funder,et al.  Predicting personality and behavior: a boundary on the acquaintanceship effect. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  D. Funder,et al.  The Effect of Information on Consensus and Accuracy in Personality Judgment , 1998 .

[52]  S. Srivastava,et al.  The Big Five Trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. , 1999 .

[53]  O. John,et al.  Determinants of interjudge agreement on personality traits: the big five domains, observability, evaluativeness, and the unique perspective of the self. , 1993, Journal of personality.