Hearing-aid users’ voices: A factor that could affect directional benefit

Abstract Objective: Backward-facing directional processing (Back-DIR) is an algorithm that employs an anti-cardioid directivity pattern to enhance speech arriving from behind the listener. An experiment that was originally designed to evaluate Back-DIR, together with its follow-up experiment, are reported to illustrate how hearing-aid users’ voices could affect directional benefit. Design: Speech recognition performance was measured in a speech-180°/noise-0° configuration, with aids programmed to Back-DIR enabled or omnidirectional processing. In the original experiment, the conventional hearing-in-noise test (HINT) was used, wherein listeners repeated heard sentences. In the follow-up experiment, a modified HINT was used, wherein a carrier phrase was presented before each sentence. Study sample: Fifteen adults with sensorineural hearing loss participated in both experiments. Results: Significant Back-DIR benefit (relative to omnidirectional processing) was observed in the follow-up experiment, while not in the original experiment. Conclusions: In the original experiment, hearing aids were affected by listeners’ voices such that Back-DIR was not always activated when the target speech was presented. In the follow-up experiment, listeners’ voice effects were eliminated by the carrier phrase activating Back-DIR before the sentences were presented. The results suggest that the effect of hearing-aid technologies is highly dependent on the characteristics of listening conditions.

[1]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Birgitta Larsby,et al.  A Swedish version of the Hearing In Noise Test (HINT) for measurement of speech recognition , 2006, International journal of audiology.

[3]  Mary T Cord,et al.  Relationship between laboratory measures of directional advantage and everyday success with directional microphone hearing aids. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  Larry E. Humes,et al.  Studies of Hearing-Aid Outcome Measures in Older Adults: A Comparison of Technologies and an Examination of Individual Differences , 2009 .

[5]  Todd Ricketts,et al.  Evaluation of an adaptive, directional-microphone hearing aid: Evaluación de un auxiliar auditivo de micrófono direccional adaptable , 2002, International journal of audiology.

[6]  Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al.  A method to measure hearing aid directivity index and polar pattern in small and reverberant enclosures , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[7]  Douglas Noffsinger,et al.  Subjective measures of hearing aid benefit and satisfaction in the NIDCD/VA follow-up study. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[8]  Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al.  The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile. , 2013, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[9]  Todd Ricketts,et al.  Real-world benefit from directional microphone hearing aids. , 2009, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[10]  Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al.  Do older adults have social lifestyles that place fewer demands on hearing? , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[11]  Sergei Kochkin,et al.  MarkeTrak VII: Obstacles to adult non‐user adoption of hearing aids , 2007 .

[12]  Harvey Dillon,et al.  NAL-NL1: A new procedure for fitting non-linear hearing aids , 1999 .

[13]  H Gustav Mueller,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a new hearing aid anti-cardioid directivity pattern , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[14]  C A Sammeth,et al.  Field trial evaluations of a switched directional/omnidirectional in-the-ear hearing instrument. , 1999, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[15]  Ruth A Bentler,et al.  Hearing-in-Noise: comparison of listeners with normal and (aided) impaired hearing. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[16]  Mary T Cord,et al.  Effect of signal-to-noise ratio on directional microphone benefit and preference. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  Josef Chalupper,et al.  New algorithm automatically adjusts directional system for special situations , 2011 .

[18]  R. Bentler Effectiveness of directional microphones and noise reduction schemes in hearing aids: a systematic review of the evidence. , 2005, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[19]  H Gustav Mueller,et al.  Evaluation of a second-order directional microphone hearing aid: II. Self-report outcomes. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al.  Effect of age on directional microphone hearing aid benefit and preference. , 2010, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[21]  R K Surr,et al.  Comparison of benefits provided by different hearing aid technologies. , 2000, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[22]  Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al.  Impact of Visual Cues on Directional Benefit and Preference: Part I—Laboratory Tests , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[23]  Paula P. Henry,et al.  Full Time Directional versus User Selectable Microphone Modes in Hearing Aids , 2003, Ear and hearing.

[24]  Yu-Hsiang Wu,et al.  Impact of Visual Cues on Directional Benefit and Preference: Part II—Field Tests , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[25]  Mary T Cord,et al.  Performance of directional microphone hearing aids in everyday life. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[26]  Francis Kuk,et al.  Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone. , 2012, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.