Shore Construction Detection by Automotive Radar for the Needs of Autonomous Surface Vehicle Navigation

Autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) are becoming more and more popular for performing hydrographic and navigational tasks. One of the key aspects of autonomous navigation is the need to avoid collisions with other objects, including shore structures. During a mission, an ASV should be able to automatically detect obstacles and perform suitable maneuvers. This situation also arises in near-coastal areas, where shore structures like berths or moored vessels can be encountered. On the other hand, detection of coastal structures may also be helpful for berthing operations. An ASV can be launched and moored automatically only if it can detect obstacles in its vicinity. One commonly used method for target detection by ASVs involves the use of laser rangefinders. The main disadvantage of this approach is that such systems perform poorly in conditions with bad visibility, such as in fog or heavy rain. Therefore, alternative methods need to be sought. An innovative approach to this task is presented in this paper, which describes the use of automotive three-dimensional radar on a floating platform. The goal of the study was to assess target detection possibilities based on a comparison with photogrammetric images obtained by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The scenarios considered focused on analyzing the possibility of detecting shore structures like berths, wooden jetties, and small houses, as well as natural objects like trees or other kinds of vegetation. The recording from the radar was integrated into a single complex radar image of shore targets. It was then compared with an orthophotomap prepared from AUV camera pictures, as well as with a map based on traditional land surveys. The possibility and accuracy of detection for various types of shore structure were statistically assessed. The results show good potential for the proposed approach—in general, objects can be detected using the radar—although there is a need for development of further signal processing algorithms.

[1]  Joohyun Woo,et al.  Obstacle avoidance and target search of an Autonomous Surface Vehicle for 2016 Maritime RobotX challenge , 2017, 2017 IEEE Underwater Technology (UT).

[2]  Chan Gook Park,et al.  Robust performance of Terrain Referenced Navigation using flash LiDAR , 2016, 2016 IEEE/ION Position, Location and Navigation Symposium (PLANS).

[3]  Zhibiao Jiang,et al.  Off-road obstacle sensing using synthetic aperture radar interferometry , 2017 .

[4]  Ho-Jin Choi,et al.  Neural network-based autonomous navigation for a homecare mobile robot , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp).

[5]  Pawel Burdziakowski Towards Precise Visual Navigation and Direct Georeferencing for MAV Using ORB-SLAM2 , 2017, 2017 Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics).

[6]  Jacek Lubczonek Analysis of accuracy of surveillance radar image overlay by using georeferencing method , 2015, 2015 16th International Radar Symposium (IRS).

[7]  Ryan Close,et al.  Fusion of lidar and radar for detection of partially obscured objects , 2015, Defense + Security Symposium.

[8]  Piotr Borkowski,et al.  Decision Support in Collision Situations at Sea , 2016, Journal of Navigation.

[10]  Branko Ristic,et al.  Feature-based robot navigation using a Doppler-azimuth radar , 2017, Int. J. Control.

[11]  Piotr Borkowski,et al.  Fusion of data from gps receivers based on a multi-sensor Kalman filter , 2008 .

[12]  Hermann Rohling,et al.  Pedestrian classification with 24 GHz chirp sequence radar , 2015, 2015 16th International Radar Symposium (IRS).

[13]  Yoji Kuroda,et al.  Development of Autonomous Navigation System Using 3D Map with Geometric and Semantic Information , 2017, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[14]  Andrzej Stateczny,et al.  Hydrodron — New Step for Professional Hydrography for Restricted Waters , 2018, 2018 Baltic Geodetic Congress (BGC Geomatics).

[15]  Zhixiang Liu,et al.  Unmanned surface vehicles: An overview of developments and challenges , 2016, Annu. Rev. Control..

[16]  Tomasz Praczyk,et al.  Neural anti-collision system for Autonomous Surface Vehicle , 2015, Neurocomputing.

[17]  Adam Weintrit,et al.  Determination of the Territorial Sea Baseline - Aspect of Using Unmanned Hydrographic Vessels , 2016 .

[18]  Gregor Siegert,et al.  Validation of Radar Image Tracking Algorithms with Simulated Data , 2017 .

[19]  Sven Behnke,et al.  Continuous mapping and localization for autonomous navigation in rough terrain using a 3D laser scanner , 2017, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[20]  Roman Śmierzchalski,et al.  Comparison of Single and Multi-Population Evolutionary Algorithm for Path Planning in Navigation Situation , 2013 .

[21]  Ayoub Al-Hamadi,et al.  Pedestrian tracking with occlusion using a 24 GHz automotive radar , 2014, 2014 15th International Radar Symposium (IRS).

[22]  Marion Jaud,et al.  Towards LIDAR-RADAR based terrain mapping , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO).

[23]  Eva Volna,et al.  Control of autonomous robot using neural networks , 2017 .

[24]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  A constrained A* approach towards optimal path planning for an unmanned surface vehicle in a maritime environment containing dynamic obstacles and ocean currents , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[25]  Witold Kazimierski Application schema for radar information on ship , 2016, 2016 17th International Radar Symposium (IRS).

[26]  Andrzej Stateczny,et al.  Fusion of data from AIS and tracking radar for the needs of ECDIS , 2013, 2013 Signal Processing Symposium (SPS).

[27]  Natalia Wawrzyniak,et al.  Analysis of radar integration possibilities in inland mobile navigation , 2015, 2015 16th International Radar Symposium (IRS).

[28]  Rafal Szlapczynski,et al.  Ship domain applied to determining distances for collision avoidance manoeuvres in give-way situations , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[29]  Alan Wee-Chung Liew,et al.  A Likelihood-Based Data Fusion Model for the Integration of Multiple Sensor Data: A Case Study with Vision and Lidar Sensors , 2015, RiTA.

[30]  Józef Lisowski,et al.  Optimization-Supported Decision-Making in the Marine Game Environment , 2013 .

[31]  Witold Kazimierski,et al.  Cartographic aspects of radar information integration in mobile navigation system for inland waters , 2016, 2016 17th International Radar Symposium (IRS).

[32]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Obstacle Avoidance Approaches for Autonomous Navigation of Unmanned Surface Vehicles , 2017, Journal of Navigation.

[33]  Rafal Szlapczynski,et al.  A method of determining and visualizing safe motion parameters of a ship navigating in restricted waters , 2017 .

[34]  Jakub Szulwic,et al.  A COMMERCIAL OF THE SHELF COMPONENTS FOR AN UNMANNED AIR VEHICLE PHOTOGRAMMETRY , 2016 .

[35]  Marek Przyborski,et al.  Information About Dynamics of the Sea Surface as a Means to Improve Safety of the Unmanned Vessel at Sea , 2016 .

[36]  Yuanchang Liu,et al.  Smoothed A* algorithm for practical unmanned surface vehicle path planning , 2019, Applied Ocean Research.

[37]  Roman Smierzchalski,et al.  Termination functions for evolutionary path planning algorithm , 2014, 2014 19th International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR).

[38]  Martin Schneider,et al.  Automotive Radar – Status and Trends , 2005 .

[39]  I. Gresham,et al.  A 76-77 GHz pulsed-Doppler radar module for autonomous cruise control applications , 2000, 2000 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (Cat. No.00CH37017).

[40]  Cezary Specht,et al.  Application of an Autonomous/Unmanned Survey Vessel (ASV/USV) in Bathymetric Measurements , 2017 .

[41]  J. Lisowski The Optimal and Safe Ship Trajectories for Different Forms of Neural State Constraints , 2011 .