Enhanced speech privacy in office spaces

There is an ever-increasing demand for speech privacy in modern office spaces. People prefer their conversations to remain private while not being disturbed by speech of others. The work presented in this article focuses on reducing the intelligibility of the perceived speech by masking the original signal without a significant additional annoyance. The disruption of the information-carrying components of speech by the amplitude and temporal smearing is of a specific interest of this work. We suggest a method in which a modified self-adjusted masking signal is used to effectively counteract the drawbacks of a straightforward reverberation. The presented masking method disrupts key speech characteristics of the original signal. The intelligibility and annoyance levels of the resulting signal are subjectively evaluated. The optimized experimental parameters are reported. The presented method provides a significantly higher speech privacy and a lower perceived annoyance as compared to white noise. The method can be used in office environments with various Sound Transmission Class levels.

[1]  Nicoleta Roman,et al.  Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Charles Darwin,et al.  The Perception of Speech , 1961, Nature.

[3]  R. M. Warren Perceptual Restoration of Missing Speech Sounds , 1970, Science.

[4]  Oldooz Hazrati,et al.  The combined effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility by cochlear implant listeners , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[5]  Takayuki Arai Masking speech with its time-reversed signal , 2010 .

[6]  Jonas Braasch,et al.  Tuning the cognitive environment: Sound masking with “natural” sounds in open-plan offices , 2015 .

[7]  James P. Conroy,et al.  Sound Transmission Class - Field Testing and Results , 2003 .

[8]  Yusuke Hioka,et al.  Effect of adding artificial reverberation to speech-like masking sound , 2016 .

[9]  Yi Hu,et al.  Effects of early and late reflections on intelligibility of reverberated speech by cochlear implant listeners. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J M Festen Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R Plomp,et al.  Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit of hearing aids. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  K. Wagener,et al.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise: Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[13]  G. Zimmermann,et al.  Effects of white noise masking and low pass filtering on speech kinematics. , 1983, Journal of Speech and Hearing Research.

[14]  Richard de Dear,et al.  Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in open-plan offices - eScholarship , 2013 .

[15]  Philipos C Loizou,et al.  Extending the articulation index to account for non-linear distortions introduced by noise-suppression algorithms. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  D G Childers,et al.  Gender recognition from speech. Part II: Fine analysis. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  Adrian P. Simpson,et al.  Phonetic differences between male and female speech , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[18]  Makio Kashino,et al.  Phonemic restoration : The brain creates missing speech sounds , 2006 .

[19]  Jesper Jensen,et al.  An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Robert Ljung,et al.  Unmasking the effects of masking on performance: The potential of multiple-voice masking in the office environment. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Effects of spectral smearing on phoneme and word recognition. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.