Homogeneous vs heterogeneous subduction zone models: Coseismic and postseismic deformation

A finite‐element model (FEM) incorporating geologic properties characteristic of a subduction zone is compared with FEMs approximating homogeneous elastic half‐spaces (HEHS)s to investigate the effect of heterogeneity on coseismic and postseismic deformation predictions for the 1995 Colima‐Jalisco Mw =8.0 earthquake. The FEMs are used to compute a coefficient matrix relating displacements at observation points due to unit dislocations of contact‐node pairs on the fault surface. The Green's function responses are used to solve the inverse problem of estimating dislocation distributions from coseismic GPS displacements. Predictions from the FEM with heterogeneous material properties, loaded with either of the HEHS dislocation distributions, significantly overestimate coseismic displacements. Postseismic deformation predictions are also sensitive to the coseismic dislocation distribution, which drives poroelastic and viscoelastic relaxation. FEM‐generated Green's functions, which allow for spatial variations in material properties, are thus preferable to those that assume a simple HEHS because the latter leads to dislocation distributions unsuitable for predicting the postseismic response.

[1]  S. K. Singh,et al.  The great Jalisco, Mexico, earthquakes of 1932: Subduction of the Rivera plate , 1985 .

[2]  W. D. Stuart,et al.  Material heterogeneity simplifies the picture: Loma prieta , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[3]  Y. Okada.  Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1992, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America.

[4]  J. Walder,et al.  Chapter 19 Hydraulic Pulses in the Earth's Crust , 1992 .

[5]  M. Pardo,et al.  Shape of the subducted Rivera and Cocos plates in southern Mexico: Seismic and tectonic implications , 1995 .

[6]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Quasi‐static dislocations in three dimensional inhomogeneous media , 1997 .

[7]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  The geodetic signature of the M8.0 Oct. 9,1995, Jalisco Subduction Earthquake , 1997 .

[8]  Kenneth W. Hudnut,et al.  Poroelastic rebound along the Landers 1992 earthquake surface rupture , 1998 .

[9]  J. C. Savage.  Displacement field for an edge dislocation in a layered half‐space , 1998 .

[10]  S. Hartzell,et al.  Fault-slip distribution of the 1995 Colima-Jalisco, Mexico, earthquake , 1999 .

[11]  Herbert F. Wang.  Theory of Linear Poroelasticity with Applications to Geomechanics and Hydrogeology , 2000 .

[12]  T. Masterlark,et al.  Poroelastic coupling between the 1992 Landers and Big Bear Earthquakes , 2000 .

[13]  T. Masterlark.  Regional fault mechanics following the 1992 Landers earthquake , 2000 .

[14]  Robert W. Graves,et al.  Resolution analysis of finite fault source inversion using one- and three-dimensional Green's functions: 2. Combining seismic and geodetic data , 2001 .

[15]  C. Demets,et al.  Slip kinematics and dynamics during and after the 1995 October 9 Mw = 8.0 Colima–Jalisco earthquake, Mexico, from GPS geodetic constraints , 2001 .