Materializing policies for sustainable use and economy-wide management of resources : biophysical perspectives, socio-economic options and a dual approach for the European Union

Policies for Sustainable Use and economy-wide Management of natural Resources (SUMR) throughout the production and consumption system are faced with environmental and socio-economic requirements and regulatory constraints. Based on empirical findings of ongoing trends of resource use, decoupling from economic growth, and transregional problem shifting, the paper outlines a potentially sustainable biophysical basis for production and consumption in the EU. It discusses the main challenges for the major resource groups, describing the specific and the common tasks with regard to biomass, fossil fuels, metals, non-metallic minerals. Adopting a medical metaphor, it suggests that policies for SUMR should follow a dual approach reflecting the long-term need for a main cure of the socio-industrial metabolism in form of a "conditioning" towards a more mature, resource efficient, and renewables based constitution on the one hand, and a fine tuning of selected material flows (e.g. for optimized recycling and control of hazardous compounds) on the other hand. Both strategies are deemed complementary and necessary to reduce environmental impacts and increase the utility of material use. Action required is exemplified with regard to the three pillars of SUMR, i.e. improved orientation, information and incentives.

[1]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Policy review on decoupling : development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries , 2005 .

[2]  H. Schütz,et al.  Rationale for and Interpretation of Economy‐Wide Materials Flow Analysis and Derived Indicators , 2003 .

[3]  Raimund Bleischwitz,et al.  Eco-efficiency, regulation and sustainable business : towards a governance structure for sustainable development , 2004 .

[4]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Globalisation and the Shifting Environmental Burden , 2004 .

[5]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[6]  S. Bringezu Ressourcennutzung in Wirtschaftsräumen , 2000 .

[7]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Resource use in European countries: An estimate of materials and waste streams in the community, including imports and exports using the instrument of material flow analysis , 2005 .

[8]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Biofuels and competition for global land use , 2005 .

[9]  Raimund Bleischwitz,et al.  Ressourcenproduktivität - Innovationen für Umwelt und Beschäftigung , 1997 .

[10]  H. Weisz,et al.  The Weight of Nations : Material Outflows from Industrial Economies , 2000 .

[11]  Edward B. Barbier,et al.  Economics, natural-resource scarcity and development: conventional and alternative views. , 1989 .

[12]  Stefan Bringezu Erdlandung : Navigation zu den Ressourcen der Zukunft , 2004 .

[13]  Daniel A. Underwood Economics, natural-resource scarcity and development: Conventional and alternative views : Edward B. Barbier. Earthscan, London, UK, 1989. 223 pp. ISBN 1-85383-024-0/1990 ISBN 1-85383-072-0 (paperback) , 1991 .

[14]  Hartmut Fischer,et al.  Wachstums- und Beschäftigungsimpulse rentabler Materialeinsparungen , 2004 .

[15]  H. Schütz,et al.  Globalisation and the shifting environmental burden : material trade flows of the European Union ; which globalisation is sustainable? , 2004 .

[16]  J. Bongaarts,et al.  Global Environment Outlook , 1998 .

[17]  H. Daly Steady-State Economics: Concepts, Questions, Policies , 1992 .

[18]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Towards sustainable resource management in the European Union , 2002 .