Citizen Science on Your Smartphone: An ELSI Research Agenda

Beginning in the 20th century, scientific research came to be dominated by a growing class of credentialed, professional scientists who overwhelmingly displaced the learned amateurs of an earlier time. By the end of the century, however, the exclusive realm of professional scientists conducting research was joined, to a degree, by “citizen scientists.” The term originally encompassed non-professionals assisting professional scientists by contributing observations and measurements to ongoing research enterprises. These collaborations were especially common in the environmental sciences, where citizen scientists participated in counting wildlife and measuring environmental conditions. Later, patient groups began to play a more active role in supporting clinical trials and collecting health records from affected individuals.

[1]  John A. Lynch,et al.  Practical guidance on informed consent for pediatric participants in a biorepository. , 2014, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[2]  Robert C. Green,et al.  Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[3]  George Church,et al.  Ethical and Practical Guidelines for Reporting Genetic Research Results to Study Participants: Updated Guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Working Group , 2010, Circulation. Cardiovascular genetics.

[4]  G. Henderson Is Informed Consent Broken? , 2011, The American journal of the medical sciences.

[5]  P. Lucier The Professional and the Scientist in Nineteenth-Century America , 2009, Isis.

[6]  Yin Liu,et al.  mHealthApps: A Repository and Database of Mobile Health Apps , 2015, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[7]  Colleen Lewis,et al.  Therapeutic misconception, misestimation, and optimism in participants enrolled in phase 1 trials , 2012, Cancer.

[8]  L. Ross Achieving Justice in Genomic Translation: Re-Thinking the Pathway to Benefit , 2012 .

[9]  Victor C Strasburger,et al.  Children, Adolescents, and the Media , 2002, Clinical pediatrics.

[10]  Ari M. Vanderwalde,et al.  Paying Human Subjects in Research: Where are We, How Did We Get Here, and Now What? , 2011, The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[11]  Diane M. Korngiebel,et al.  What Should Be the Character of the Researcher- Participant Relationship? Views of Participants in a Long-standing Cancer Genetic Registry. , 2015, IRB.

[12]  L. Ross,et al.  Incidental findings of therapeutic misconception in biobank-based research , 2012, Genetics in Medicine.

[13]  D. Bates,et al.  In search of a few good apps. , 2014, JAMA.

[14]  Robert Kevin Grigsby,et al.  Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects , 1993, Research on social work practice.

[15]  Giselle Corbie-Smith,et al.  Attitudes and beliefs of african americans toward participation in medical research , 1999, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[16]  Daniel R. Morrison,et al.  Two large‐scale surveys on community attitudes toward an opt‐out biobank , 2011, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[17]  C. Potter,et al.  Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions , 2014, Public understanding of science.

[18]  John P A Ioannidis,et al.  Evaluation of Wellness Determinants and Interventions by Citizen Scientists. , 2015, JAMA.