Methodological issues in achieving school accountability 1

Test‐based educational accountability is widely used in many countries, but is pervasive in the US. Key features of test‐based accountability required by the US No Child Left Behind Act are discussed. Particular attention is given to methodological issues such as the distinction between status and growth approaches, the setting of performance targets, compensatory and multiple‐hurdle approaches, and the disaggregation of results. The strengths and limitations of growth and of value‐added models are discussed. It is concluded that school accountability results are best thought of as providing potentially valuable descriptive information rather than supporting strong inferences about school quality.

[1]  M. McNeil.  Rigorous Courses, Fresh Enrollment. , 2007 .

[2]  Scott F. Marion,et al.  Making Valid and Reliable Decisions in Determining Adequate Yearly Progress. A Paper in the Series: Implementing the State Accountability System Requirements under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. , 2002 .

[3]  Paul Wright,et al.  Controlling for Student Background in Value-Added Assessment of Teachers , 2004 .

[4]  Robert L. Linn,et al.  Performance Standards: Utility for Different Uses of Assessments , 2003 .

[5]  R. Linn.  Improving the Accountability Provisions of NCLB , 2006 .

[6]  Stephen W. Raudenbush,et al.  What Are Value-Added Models Estimating and What Does This Imply for Statistical Practice? , 2004 .

[7]  R. Linn.  Conflicting Demands of No Child Left Behind and State Systems: Mixed Messages about School Performance , 2005 .

[8]  Robert L. Linn,et al.  Accountability: Responsibility and Reasonable Expectations , 2003 .

[9]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Scientific Culture and Educational Research , 2002 .

[10]  R. Linn.  Validity of Inferences from Test-based Educational Accountability Systems , 2007 .

[11]  Gail L. Sunderman,et al.  Measuring Academic Proficiency Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Implications for Educational Equity , 2005 .

[12]  D. Carlson.  Four Methods of Judging School Quality and Progress. , 2003 .

[13]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  A Potential Outcomes View of Value-Added Assessment in Education , 2004 .

[14]  S. Raudenbush.  Schooling, Statistics, and Poverty: Can We Measure School Improvement?. , 2004 .