Research Note - Awareness Displays and Social Motivation for Coordinating Communication

Researchers and designers have been building awareness displays to improve the coordination of communication between distributed co-workers since the early 1990s. Awareness displays are technology designed to provide contextual information about the activities of group members. Most researchers have assumed that these displays improve the coordination of communication regardless of the relationship between the communicating parties. This article examines the conditions under which awareness displays improve coordination and the types of designs that most effectively support communication timing without overwhelming people with irrelevant information. Results from a pair of laboratory experiments indicate that awareness displays containing information about a remote collaborator's workload lead to communication attempts that are less disruptive, but only when the interrupter has incentives to be concerned about the collaborator's welfare. High-information awareness displays harmed interrupters' task performance, while abstract displays did not. We conclude that a display with an abstract representation of a collaborator's workload is optimal; it leads to better timing of interruptions without overwhelming the person viewing the display.

[1]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[2]  Chyng-Yang Jang,et al.  Virtual team awareness and groupware support: an evaluation of the TeamSCOPE system , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  James Morris,et al.  Markets for attention: will postage for email help? , 2002, CSCW '02.

[4]  Terry C. Lansdown,et al.  The mind's eye: cognitive and applied aspects of eye movement research , 2005 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[6]  James Fogarty,et al.  Presence versus availability: the design and evaluation of a context-aware communication client , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[7]  M. Abel Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization , 1990 .

[8]  Rob Kling,et al.  Reconceptualizing Users as Social Actors in Information Systems Research , 2003, MIS Q..

[9]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Discretionary Adoption of Group Support Software: Lessons from Calendar Applications , 2003, Implementing Collaboration Technologies in Industry.

[10]  Tara Matthews,et al.  Defining, Designing, and Evaluating Peripheral Displays: An Analysis Using Activity Theory , 2007, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Media Use in a Global Corporation: Electronic Mail and Organizational Knowledge , 2003 .

[12]  Bruno Van Pottelsberghe Knowledge management projects , 2000 .

[13]  R. Dawes Judgment under uncertainty: The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making , 1979 .

[14]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[15]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  If not now, when?: the effects of interruption at different moments within task execution , 2004, CHI.

[16]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  The Individual and the Collaborative: the Interactional Organisation of Trading in a City Dealing Room , 1995 .

[17]  Joseph B. Walther,et al.  Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? , 2001, Commun. Res..

[18]  Ralph L. Rosnow,et al.  Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis , 1984 .

[19]  James Fogarty,et al.  Examining task engagement in sensor-based statistical models of human interruptibility , 2005, CHI.

[20]  Scott E. Hudson,et al.  Techniques for addressing fundamental privacy and disruption tradeoffs in awareness support systems , 1996, CSCW '96.

[21]  W ZmudRobert,et al.  The identity crisis within the is discipline , 2003 .

[22]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  Designing and deploying an information awareness interface , 2002, CSCW '02.

[23]  Jun Zheng,et al.  Trust without touch: jumpstarting long-distance trust with initial social activities , 2002, CHI.

[24]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[25]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[26]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Attention and performance. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[27]  R. W. Root,et al.  Informal Communication in Organizations: Form, Function, and Technology , 1990 .

[28]  D. Broadbent,et al.  What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity , 1989 .

[29]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Incentives and Computing Systems for Team-Based Organizations , 1995 .

[30]  John C. Tang,et al.  Supporting distributed groups with a Montage of lightweight interactions , 1994, CSCW '94.

[31]  John C. Tang,et al.  Rhythm modeling, visualizations and applications , 2003, UIST '03.

[32]  Holly Arrow,et al.  A Tripartite Model of Group Identification , 1999 .

[33]  Daniel C. McFarlane,et al.  Comparison of Four Primary Methods for Coordinating the Interruption of People in Human-Computer Interaction , 2002, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[34]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Identity Crisis Within the IS Discipline: Defining and Communicating the Discipline's Core Properties , 2003, MIS Q..

[35]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation , 1992, CSCW '92.

[36]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[37]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[38]  Aimée A. Kane,et al.  Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality , 2005 .

[39]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[40]  B. Emans,et al.  Motivating Effects of Task and Outcome Interdependence in Work Teams , 1998 .

[41]  Tommy Strandvall,et al.  Eye Tracking in Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Research , 2009, INTERACT.

[42]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Video as a technology for informal communication , 1993, CACM.

[43]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication , 1992, CHI.

[44]  Joseph S. Valacich,et al.  The Effects of Interruptions, Task Complexity, and Information Presentation on Computer-Supported Decision-Making Performance , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[45]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[46]  Judith S. Olson,et al.  Distance Matters , 2000, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[47]  C. Cramton The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[48]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Portholes: supporting awareness in a distributed work group , 1992, CHI.

[49]  L. Perlow The Time Famine: Toward a Sociology of Work Time , 1999 .

[50]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Models of attention in computing and communication , 2003, Commun. ACM.

[51]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..