The basic level in personality-trait hierarchies: studies of trait use and accessibility in different contexts.

A person's behavior and experiences can be described at different levels of abstraction. For example, a person might be described as charitable, as generous, as kind, or as good. Is there a level in such a trait hierarchy that is particularly useful in personality descriptions? The present 4 studies show that there is indeed a general preference for a particular level; the size of this preference depends on the familiarity and likability of the target people, which included various others and the self. These findings suggest that in trait hierarchies, people prefer the highest level of abstraction that is still descriptive of behavior (e.g., kind) over more descriptive subordinate levels (e.g., charitable and generous) and over an even broader level devoid of descriptive meaning (e.g., good). This level is basic in that it represents the optimal resolution of the trade-off between bandwidth and fidelity that characterizes all hierarchies.

[1]  J. Tanaka,et al.  Object categories and expertise: Is the basic level in the eye of the beholder? , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  O. John,et al.  Towards a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho‐lexical study , 1990 .

[3]  D L Medin,et al.  Concepts and conceptual structure. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[4]  G. Murphy,et al.  Categorizing objects in isolation and in scenes: what a superordinate is good for. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  K. Moser.  The Act-Frequency Approach , 1989 .

[6]  G. Miller,et al.  The organization of adjectival meanings , 1989 .

[7]  L. Rips,et al.  Folk psychology of mental activities. , 1989, Psychological review.

[8]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Person memory and judgment. , 1989, Psychological review.

[9]  W. Mischel,et al.  Conditional hedges and the intuitive psychology of traits. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Category‐breadth and social‐desirability values for 573 personality terms , 1987 .

[11]  Roberta L. Klatzky,et al.  Traits and social stereotypes: Levels of categorization in person perception. , 1987 .

[12]  John F. Kihlstrom,et al.  Personality and social intelligence , 1987 .

[13]  Bernadette Park.  A Method for Studying the Development of Impressions of Real People , 1986 .

[14]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  Category breadth and hierarchical structure in personality: studies of asymmetries in judgments of trait implications. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  A. Rifkin,et al.  Evidence for a basic level in event taxonomies , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[16]  O. John,et al.  Social categorization and behavioral episodes: A cognitive analysis of the effects of intergroup contact. , 1985 .

[17]  B. Tversky,et al.  Journal of Experimental Psychology : General VOL . 113 , No . 2 JUNE 1984 Objects , Parts , and Categories , 2005 .

[18]  G. Murphy,et al.  Changes in conceptual structure with expertise: Differences between real-world experts and novices. , 1984 .

[19]  S. Hampson.  Trait ascription and depth of acquaintance: The preference for traits in personality descriptions and its relation to target familiarity. , 1983 .

[20]  Kenneth H. Craik,et al.  The Act Frequency Approach to Personality , 1983 .

[21]  D. O. Sears,et al.  The person-positivity bias. , 1983 .

[22]  B. Tversky,et al.  Categories of environmental scenes , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  J. Hampton.  A demonstration of intransitivity in natural categories , 1982, Cognition.

[24]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[25]  Nancy Cantor,et al.  A prototype analysis of psychological situations , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  Gregory L. Murphy,et al.  Cue validity and levels of categorization. , 1982 .

[27]  Walter Mischel,et al.  The role of purpose in the organization of information about behavior: Trait-based versus goal-based categories in person cognition. , 1981 .

[28]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[29]  Susan T. Fiske,et al.  Person concepts: The effect of target familiarity and descriptive purpose on the process of describing others , 1979 .

[30]  W. Mischel,et al.  Prototypes in Person Perception1 , 1979 .

[31]  A. Tversky.  Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[32]  E. Starodub,et al.  [Principles of classification of peptic ulcer]. , 1977, Vrachebnoe delo.

[33]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  W. T. Norman,et al.  2800 PERSONALITY TRAIT DESCRIPTORS--NORMATIVE OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS FOR A UNIVERSITY POPULATION. , 1967 .

[35]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Psychological tests and personnel decisions , 1958 .

[36]  F. Heider.  The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[37]  R. Brown.  How shall a thing be called. , 1958, Psychological review.

[38]  L. Festinger,et al.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 2017 .

[39]  H. Eysenck.  Dimensions of Personality , 1947 .