Statistical independence in nonlinear model-based inversion for quantitative photoacoustic tomography

The statistical independence between the distributions of different chromophores in tissue has previously been used for linear unmixing with independent component analysis (ICA). In this study, we propose exploiting this statistical property in a nonlinear model-based inversion method. The aim is to reduce the sensitivity of the inversion scheme to errors in the modelling of the fluence, and hence provide more accurate quantification of the concentration of independent chromophores. A gradient-based optimisation algorithm is used to minimise the error functional, which includes a term representing the mutual information between the chromophores in addition to the standard least-squares data error. Both numerical simulations and an experimental phantom study are conducted to demonstrate that, in the presence of experimental errors in the fluence model, the proposed inversion method results in more accurate estimation of the concentrations of independent chromophores compared to the standard model-based inversion.

[1]  D. M. Titterington,et al.  A Study of Methods of Choosing the Smoothing Parameter in Image Restoration by Regularization , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[2]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Blind source unmixing in multi-spectral optoacoustic tomography. , 2011, Optics express.

[3]  Guillaume Bal,et al.  On multi-spectral quantitative photoacoustic tomography in diffusive regime , 2012 .

[4]  Sarah E Bohndiek,et al.  Contrast agents for molecular photoacoustic imaging , 2016, Nature Methods.

[5]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Deep-Tissue Reporter-Gene Imaging with Fluorescence and Optoacoustic Tomography: A Performance Overview , 2014, Molecular Imaging and Biology.

[6]  L. Kou,et al.  Refractive indices of water and ice in the 0.65- to 2.5-µm spectral range. , 1993, Applied optics.

[7]  S. Arridge,et al.  Estimating chromophore distributions from multiwavelength photoacoustic images. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[8]  Martin Schweiger,et al.  Information theoretic regularization in diffuse optical tomography. , 2009, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  Erkki Oja,et al.  Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications , 2000, Neural Networks.

[10]  P. Beard Biomedical photoacoustic imaging , 2011, Interface Focus.

[11]  Martin Schweiger,et al.  The Toast++ software suite for forward and inverse modeling in optical tomography , 2014, Journal of biomedical optics.

[12]  Robert Ellwood,et al.  Exploiting statistical independence for quantitative photoacoustic tomography , 2017, BiOS.

[13]  Jing Wang,et al.  Applications of Independent Component Analysis in Endmember Extraction and Abundance Quantification for Hyperspectral Imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[15]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  D K Smith,et al.  Numerical Optimization , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[17]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  Multispectral optoacoustic tomography of myocardial infarction , 2012, Photoacoustics.

[18]  Yoav Y. Schechner,et al.  ICA Using Kernel Entropy Estimation with NlogN Complexity , 2004, ICA.

[19]  R. Boellaard,et al.  Reproducibility of quantitative (R)-[11C]verapamil studies , 2012, EJNMMI Research.

[20]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[21]  James Joseph,et al.  Towards Quantitative Evaluation of Tissue Absorption Coefficients Using Light Fluence Correction in Optoacoustic Tomography , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  S. Jacques Optical properties of biological tissues: a review , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Paul C. Beard,et al.  Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging and inversion for accurate quantification of chromophore distributions , 2017, BiOS.

[24]  G. Uhlmann,et al.  Thermoacoustic tomography with variable sound speed , 2009, 0902.1973.

[25]  Huabei Jiang,et al.  Quantitative three-dimensional photoacoustic tomography of the finger joints: an in vivo study. , 2009, Journal of biomedical optics.

[26]  Jan Laufer,et al.  Quantitative determination of chromophore concentrations from 2D photoacoustic images using a nonlinear model-based inversion scheme. , 2010, Applied optics.

[27]  Marta Betcke,et al.  Accelerated high-resolution photoacoustic tomography via compressed sensing , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  H. J. van Staveren,et al.  Light scattering in Intralipid-10% in the wavelength range of 400-1100 nm. , 1991, Applied optics.

[29]  S. Jacques,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithm for optoacoustic imaging. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  Edward Z. Zhang,et al.  Orthogonal Fabry-Pérot sensors for photoacoustic tomography , 2016, SPIE BiOS.

[31]  Jan Laufer,et al.  Evaluation of Absorbing Chromophores Used in Tissue Phantoms for Quantitative Photoacoustic Spectroscopy and Imaging , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[32]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  A gradient-based method for quantitative photoacoustic tomography using the radiative transfer equation , 2013 .

[33]  Jan Laufer,et al.  Backward-mode multiwavelength photoacoustic scanner using a planar Fabry-Perot polymer film ultrasound sensor for high-resolution three-dimensional imaging of biological tissues. , 2008, Applied optics.

[34]  Simon R. Arridge,et al.  Reconstructing absorption and scattering distributions in quantitative photoacoustic tomography , 2012 .

[35]  Mark A. Anastasio,et al.  Full-Wave Iterative Image Reconstruction in Photoacoustic Tomography With Acoustically Inhomogeneous Media , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[36]  Vasilis Ntziachristos,et al.  High resolution tumor targeting in living mice by means of multispectral optoacoustic tomography , 2012, EJNMMI Research.

[37]  S L Jacques,et al.  Optical properties of intralipid: A phantom medium for light propagation studies , 1992, Lasers in surgery and medicine.

[38]  Robert Ellwood,et al.  Photoacoustic tomography using orthogonal Fabry–Pérot sensors , 2016, Journal of biomedical optics.