ESOPE-Equivalent Pulsing Protocols for Calcium Electroporation: An In Vitro Optimization Study on 2 Cancer Cell Models

Reversible electroporation is used to increase the uptake of chemotherapeutic drugs in local tumor treatment (electrochemotherapy) by applying the pulsing protocol (8 rectangular pulses, 1000 V/cm, 100 µs) standardized in the framework of the European Standard Operating Procedure on Electrochemotherapy multicenter trial. Currently, new electrochemotherapy strategies are under development to extend its applicability to tumors with different histology. Electrical parameters and drug type are critical factors. A possible approach is to test pulse parameters different from European Standard Operating Procedure on Electrochemotherapy but with comparable electroporation yield (European Standard Operating Procedure on Electrochemotherapy-equivalent protocols). Moreover, the use of non-toxic drugs combined with electroporation represents the new frontier for electrochemotherapy applications; calcium electroporation has been recently proposed as a simple tool for anticancer therapy. In vitro investigations facilitate the optimization of electrical parameters and drugs for in vivo and clinical testing. In this optimization study, new pulsing protocols have been tested by increasing the pulse number and reducing the electric field with respect to the standard. European Standard Operating Procedure on Electrochemotherapy-equivalent protocols have been identified in HL-60 and A431 cancer cell models, and a higher sensitivity in terms of electroporation yield has been recorded in HL-60 cells. Moreover, cell killing efficacy of European Standard Operating Procedure on Electrochemotherapy-equivalent protocols has been demonstrated in the presence of increasing calcium concentrations on both cell lines. Equivalent European Standard Operating Procedure on Electrochemotherapy protocols can be used to optimize the therapeutic effects in the clinic, where different regions of the same cancer tissue, with different electrical properties, might result in a differential electroporation yield of the standard protocol over the same tissue, or, eventually, in an override of the operational limits of the instrument. Moreover, using calcium can help overcome the drawbacks of standard drugs (side effects, high costs, difficult handling, preparation, and storage procedures). These results support the possibility of new treatment options in both standard electrochemotherapy and calcium electroporation, with clear advantages in the clinic.

[1]  Richard Heller,et al.  Electrically mediated delivery of plasmid DNA to the skin, using a multielectrode array. , 2010, Human gene therapy.

[2]  Yi-Kuen Lee,et al.  Using a micro electroporation chip to determine the optimal physical parameters in the uptake of biomolecules in HeLa cells. , 2007, Bioelectrochemistry.

[3]  Z. Levine,et al.  Calcium and Phosphatidylserine Inhibit Lipid Electropore Formation and Reduce Pore Lifetime , 2012, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[4]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Electropermeabilization of dense cell suspensions , 2007, European Biophysics Journal.

[5]  Difference in Membrane Repair Capacity Between Cancer Cell Lines and a Normal Cell Line , 2016, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[6]  Gintautas Saulis,et al.  Changes of the solution pH due to exposure by high-voltage electric pulses. , 2005, Bioelectrochemistry.

[7]  M. Tangney,et al.  Electrochemotherapy: Aspects of Preclinical Development and Early Clinical Experience , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[8]  I. Wilson,et al.  Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[9]  John C. Bischof,et al.  A Review of Basic to Clinical Studies of Irreversible Electroporation Therapy , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  M. Fini,et al.  Identification of In Vitro Electropermeabilization Equivalent Pulse Protocols , 2011, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[11]  Roberto Girelli,et al.  Feasibility and safety of electrochemotherapy (ECT) in the pancreas: a pre-clinical investigation , 2015, Radiology and oncology.

[12]  Faisal Mahmood,et al.  Optimizing clinical performance and geometrical robustness of a new electrode device for intracranial tumor electroporation. , 2011, Bioelectrochemistry.

[13]  O. Pakhomova,et al.  Different Cell Sensitivity to Pulsed Electric Field , 2016 .

[14]  Laure Lambricht,et al.  Clinical potential of electroporation for gene therapy and DNA vaccine delivery , 2016, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[15]  Sten Orrenius,et al.  Calcium and cell death mechanisms: a perspective from the cell death community. , 2011, Cell calcium.

[16]  C. Suárez,et al.  The Role of Ph Fronts in Tissue Electroporation Based Treatments , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  Julie Gehl,et al.  Direct therapeutic applications of calcium electroporation to effectively induce tumor necrosis. , 2012, Cancer research.

[18]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Electrochemotherapy – An easy, highly effective and safe treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases: Results of ESOPE (European Standard Operating Procedures of Electrochemotherapy) study , 2006 .

[19]  J Teissié,et al.  An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[20]  J. Gehl,et al.  Updated standard operating procedures for electrochemotherapy of cutaneous tumours and skin metastases , 2018, Acta oncologica.

[21]  D. Miklavčič,et al.  Electric Field Distribution and Electroporation Threshold , 2016 .

[22]  J. Gehl,et al.  Electrochemotherapy and calcium electroporation inducing a systemic immune response with local and distant remission of tumors in a patient with malignant melanoma – a case report , 2017, Acta oncologica.

[23]  J. Gehl,et al.  Normal and Malignant Cells Exhibit Differential Responses to Calcium Electroporation. , 2017, Cancer research.

[24]  J. Weaver,et al.  Electroporation: A general phenomenon for manipulating cells and tissues , 1993, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[25]  J. Gehl,et al.  Calcium Electroporation: Evidence for Differential Effects in Normal and Malignant Cell Lines, Evaluated in a 3D Spheroid Model , 2015, PloS one.

[26]  Mattia Ronchetti,et al.  Locally enhanced chemotherapy by electroporation: clinical experiences and perspective of use of electrochemotherapy. , 2014, Future oncology.

[27]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Electrochemotherapy: technological advancements for efficient electroporation-based treatment of internal tumors , 2012, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[28]  J. Gehl,et al.  New Drugs for Electrochemotherapy with Emphasis on Calcium Electroporation , 2017 .

[29]  inCancerTreatments MarieBreton,et al.  MicrosecondandNanosecondElectric Pulses , 2012 .

[30]  Damijan Miklavčič,et al.  Electrochemotherapy: from the drawing board into medical practice , 2014, BioMedical Engineering OnLine.

[31]  D Miklavcic,et al.  Electrochemotherapy in treatment of tumours. , 2008, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[32]  J. Gehl,et al.  Dose-Dependent ATP Depletion and Cancer Cell Death following Calcium Electroporation, Relative Effect of Calcium Concentration and Electric Field Strength , 2015, PloS one.

[33]  J. Gehl,et al.  Calcium electroporation induces tumor eradication, long-lasting immunity and cytokine responses in the CT26 colon cancer mouse model , 2017, Oncoimmunology.

[34]  M. Daczewska,et al.  Applications of calcium electroporation to effective apoptosis induction in fibrosarcoma cells and stimulation of normal muscle cells. , 2016, Bioelectrochemistry.

[35]  L. Marcu,et al.  Nanosecond electroperturbation-mammalian cell sensitivity and bacterial spore resistance , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[36]  J. Gehl,et al.  Effect of calcium electroporation in combination with metformin in vivo and correlation between viability and intracellular ATP level after calcium electroporation in vitro , 2017, PloS one.

[37]  A. Choromańska,et al.  Combination of therapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin with electroporation in human ovarian carcinoma model in vitro. , 2014, Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie.

[38]  C. Collins,et al.  Standard operating procedures of the electrochemotherapy: Instructions for the use of bleomycin or cisplatin administered either systemically or locally and electric pulses delivered by the CliniporatorTM by means of invasive or non-invasive electrodes , 2006 .

[39]  Julie Gehl,et al.  Calcium electroporation in three cell lines: a comparison of bleomycin and calcium, calcium compounds, and pulsing conditions. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[40]  A. T. Esser,et al.  A brief overview of electroporation pulse strength-duration space: a region where additional intracellular effects are expected. , 2012, Bioelectrochemistry.

[41]  G. Citro,et al.  Electroporation adopting trains of biphasic pulses enhances in vitro and in vivo the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin on multidrug resistant colon adenocarcinoma cells (LoVo). , 2012, European journal of cancer.

[42]  Damijan Miklavcic,et al.  Equivalent Pulse Parameters for Electroporation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[43]  G. Pucihar,et al.  Numerical Determination of Transmembrane Voltage Induced on Irregularly Shaped Cells , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  J. Gehl,et al.  Calcium electroporation for treatment of cutaneous metastases; a randomized double-blinded phase II study, comparing the effect of calcium electroporation with electrochemotherapy , 2017, Acta oncologica.