Using Sensors to Evaluate Revision TKA: Treating the “Looks Good; Feels Bad” Knee

Despite long-term success rates associated with total knee arthroplasty (TKA), a large proportion of patients continue to report dissatisfaction with their surgical outcomes. Complications such as pain, stiffness, or instability can reduce a patient’s quality of life and may be attributed to soft-tissue imbalance. The cause of imbalance related complications is often difficult to diagnose, but if unresolved may lead to early total revision surgery. However, these procedures are associated with a higher risk of post-operative complications, elicit longer rehabilitation regimes, and can become a financial burden to the patient and healthcare provider. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine if the use of intraoperative sensors during revision TKA led to a decreased need for all-component revision. In this review, 88% of intended total component revisions were changed to partial revisions based on the surgeons’ interpretation of the sensor feedback. This sparing of components saved an estimated $4,990 in healthcare provider implant costs, per case.

[1]  C. Nichols,et al.  Clinical Outcomes and Costs Within 90 Days of Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  William A. Leone,et al.  Using Sensors to Evaluate Revision TKA: Treating the “Looks Good; Feels Bad” Knee , 2016 .

[3]  A. V. Lombardi,et al.  Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant? , 2014, The bone & joint journal.

[4]  J. Parvizi,et al.  Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years? , 2014, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[5]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  S. Hofmann,et al.  The painful knee after TKA: a diagnostic algorithm for failure analysis , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[7]  Steven M. Kurtz,et al.  The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States , 2009, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  I. Brenkel,et al.  A conservative approach is feasible in unexplained pain after knee replacement: a selected cohort study. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  S. Kurtz,et al.  Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[10]  Victor Hugo Hernandez,et al.  The Increasing Financial Burden of Knee Revision Surgery in the United States , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  R. Iorio,et al.  Economics of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Increasing Prevalence, Decreasing Reimbursement , 2005 .

[12]  Kelly G Vince,et al.  Why knees fail. , 2003, The Journal of arthroplasty.