Quantity Recognition Among Speakers of an Anumeric Language

Recent research has suggested that the Pirahã, an Amazonian tribe with a number-less language, are able to match quantities > 3 if the matching task does not require recall or spatial transposition. This finding contravenes previous work among the Pirahã. In this study, we re-tested the Pirahãs' performance in the crucial one-to-one matching task utilized in the two previous studies on their numerical cognition, as well as in control tasks requiring recall and mental transposition. We also conducted a novel quantity recognition task. Speakers were unable to consistently match quantities > 3, even when no recall or transposition was involved. We provide a plausible motivation for the disparate results previously obtained among the Pirahã. Our findings are consistent with the suggestion that the exact recognition of quantities > 3 requires number terminology.

[1]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  The development of language and abstract concepts: the case of natural number. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[3]  Susan Carey,et al.  Cognitive Foundations of Arithmetic: Evolution and Ontogenisis , 2001 .

[4]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[5]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition , 2008, Cognition.

[6]  P. Gordon Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[7]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[8]  Elizabeth S Spelke,et al.  Origins of Number Sense , 2003, Psychological science.

[9]  Pierre Pica,et al.  Knowledge of Number and Knowledge of Language: Number as a Test Case for the Role of Language in Cognition , 2008 .

[10]  S. Gelman,et al.  Six does not just mean a lot: preschoolers see number words as specific , 2004, Cognition.

[11]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Why we’re so smart , 2003 .

[12]  M. Hickmann Language And Cognition In Development: Old Questions, New Directions , 2001 .

[13]  D. Everett Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã , 2005, Current Anthropology.

[14]  Karen Wynn,et al.  Addition and subtraction by human infants , 1992, Nature.

[15]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Approximate quantities and exact number words: dissociable systems , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  Harald Hammarström,et al.  Rarities in Numeral Systems , 2010 .

[17]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.