Aspects of consideration in product development research

One reason for conducting research on product development processes is to improve the usability in methods and tools for companies to be more competitive and efficient. However, the transfer of research findings over to industry has been shown to be slow and incremental, which could be seen as a result of bad usability and/or low acceptability in research findings from studies on industrial product development processes. According to our research and practice experience, we have found that, to grasp what really happens on a daily basis in a development project, to get the opportunity to reflect upon it, and to understand the complex nature of a development process, it is necessary to conduct insider action research (IAR), which is a qualitative approach. So far, the traditional outsider perspective using a quantitative research approach has been dominant. Conducting IAR means that the researcher is present and intervenes most of the time in a development project either as project leader, team member or observer. To improve the opportunities for implementation of research findings (which is an important issue for society as a whole) and to guarantee trust in presented research findings, IAR has proved to be efficient in the studied projects. As the research situation becomes unique for each product development process, trust in the research findings is strongly related to the presence of the researcher in the development process. Reliability and credibility in terms of provable data can be filed in diaries, email communications, and so on, and saved to be available if required.

[1]  K. Lukka,et al.  There and Back Again: Doing Interventionist Research in Management Accounting , 2006 .

[2]  Bernd Bender Task design and task analysis for empirical studies into design activity , 2002 .

[3]  Sten Jönsson,et al.  Doing interventionist research in management accounting , 2005 .

[4]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Analysis of solution finding processes in design teams , 2003 .

[5]  Hu Guo-zhong,et al.  Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems , 2005 .

[6]  A. Georges L. Romme,et al.  Making a Difference: Organization as Design , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[7]  Stig Ottosson Strategic considerations of the interplay between R&D and M&S , 1998 .

[8]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[9]  Stig Ottosson,et al.  Dynamic product development : Findings from participating action research in a fast new product development process , 1996 .

[10]  加来 道雄,et al.  Visions : how science will revolutionize the 21st century , 1997 .

[11]  K. Lewin Action Research and Minority Problems , 1946 .

[12]  Ken M. Wallace,et al.  Identifying and supporting the knowledge needs of novice designers within the aerospace industry , 2004 .

[13]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Creating design knowledge: from research into practice , 2000 .

[14]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[15]  Masaki Suwa,et al.  Sketches for Design and Design of Sketches , 2003 .

[16]  U. Yeliz Eseryel,et al.  Knowledge management and knowledge management systems , 2005 .

[17]  S. Ottosson Participation action research-: A key to improved knowledge of management , 2003 .

[18]  Mikael Wickelgren Engineering emotion. Values as Means in Product Development , 2005 .

[19]  Lucienne Blessing Future Issues in Design Research , 2003 .

[20]  Amaresh Chakrabarti,et al.  An overview of descriptive studies in relation to a general design research methodology , 1998 .

[21]  David Coghian Insider Action Research Projects , 2001 .

[22]  Karen Locke,et al.  Appealing Work: An Investigation of How Ethnographic Texts Convince , 1993 .

[23]  Danah Zohar Rewiring the Corporate Brain: Using the New Science to Rethink How We Structure and Lead Organizations , 1997 .

[24]  Ken M. Wallace,et al.  How Engineering Designers Obtain Information , 2003 .

[25]  Gunnela Westlander,et al.  Forskarroller i varianter av aktionsforskning , 2000 .

[26]  Lars Taxén,et al.  A Framework for the Coordination of Complex Systems' Development , 2003 .

[27]  M. Wheatley Leadership and the new science : discovering order in a chaotic world , 1999 .

[28]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Analysis of design projects , 1999 .

[29]  Annica Bragd Knowing management. An Ethnographic Study of Tinkering with a New Car , 2002 .

[30]  Michio Kaku,et al.  Visions: How Science Will Revolutionize the 21st Century , 1998 .

[31]  S. Ottosson THE DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH OF DPD – A HISTORICAL REVIEW , 2004 .

[32]  Bengt Starrin,et al.  Om delar, helheter och sociomorfologisk metod , 1996 .

[33]  Mogens Myrup Andreasen,et al.  Improving Design Methods' Usability by a Mindset Approach , 2003 .

[34]  Marco Cantamessa,et al.  An empirical perspective upon design research , 2003 .