Other-initiated Repair in Argentine Sign Language

Abstract Other-initiated repair is an essential interactional practice to secure mutual understanding in everyday interaction. This article presents evidence from a large conversational corpus of a sign language, showing that signers of Argentine Sign Language (Lengua de Señas Argentina or ‘LSA’), like users of spoken languages, use a systematic set of linguistic formats and practices to indicate troubles of signing, seeing and understanding. The general aim of this article is to provide a general overview of the different visual-gestural linguistic patterns of other-initiated repair sequences in LSA. It also describes the quantitative distribution of other-initiated repair formats based on a collection of 213 cases. It describes the multimodal components of open and restricted types of repair initiators, and reports a previously undescribed implicit practice to initiate repair in LSA in comparison to explicitly produced formats. Part of a special issue presenting repair systems across a range of languages, this article contributes to a better understanding of the phenomenon of other-initiated repair in terms of visual and gestural practices in human interaction in both signed and spoken languages.

[1]  Kobin H. Kendrick,et al.  Universal Principles in the Repair of Communication Problems , 2015, PloS one.

[2]  Patricia Siple,et al.  Visual Constraints for Sign Language Communication , 2013 .

[3]  N. J. Enfield,et al.  The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances , 2009 .

[4]  Francisco Torreira,et al.  Is “Huh?” a Universal Word? Conversational Infrastructure and the Convergent Evolution of Linguistic Items , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  W. Sandler,et al.  On the nature of phonological structure in sign language , 1993, Phonology.

[6]  Anna Sáfár,et al.  A corpus-based approach to manual simultaneity , 2013 .

[7]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  A Summary of the Literature on Global Hearing Impairment: Current Status and Priorities for Action , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  B. Woll,et al.  Frequency distribution and spreading behavior of different types of mouth actions in three sign languages , 2008 .

[9]  N. Enfield,et al.  Suspending the next turn as a form of repair initiation: evidence from Argentine Sign Language , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[10]  W. Sandler,et al.  Visual Intonation in the Prosody of a Sign Language , 2009, Language and speech.

[11]  Bencie Woll,et al.  The Linguistics of British Sign Language: An Introduction , 1999 .

[12]  Francisco Torreira,et al.  Timing of Visual Bodily Behavior in Repair Sequences: Evidence From Three Languages , 2016 .

[13]  Scott K. Liddell,et al.  American Sign Language: The Phonological Base , 2013 .

[14]  Stephen C. Levinson,et al.  Other-initiated repair in Yélî Dnye: Seeing eye-to-eye in the language of Rossel Island , 2015 .

[15]  Bencie Woll,et al.  Do Mouths Sign? Do Hands Speak?: Echo phonology as a window on language genesis , 2008 .

[16]  S. Levinson.  On the Human "Interaction Engine" , 2020, Roots of Human Sociality.

[17]  N. Enfield,et al.  Other-initiated repair across languages: towards a typology of conversational structures , 2015 .

[18]  Tanya Stivers,et al.  Mobilizing Response , 2010 .

[19]  S. Groeber,et al.  Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds , 2014 .

[20]  Robin L. Thompson,et al.  Eye gaze during comprehension of American Sign Language by native and beginning signers. , 2009, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[21]  Silvana Veinberg.  La función lingüística de los rasgos no-manuales en la aseveración, la negación y la interrogación en la Lengua de Señas Argentina , 1993 .

[22]  Laura J. Muir,et al.  Perception of sign language and its application to visual communications for deaf people. , 2005, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[23]  Ronnie B. Wilbur,et al.  Phonological and prosodic layering of nonmanuals in American Sign Language. , 2000 .

[24]  A. Bittles,et al.  Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  M. I. Massone,et al.  Sign Order in Argentine Sign Language , 2004 .

[26]  Mischa Alan Park-Doob,et al.  Gesturing Through Time: Holds and Intermodal Timing in the Stream of Speech , 2010 .

[27]  A H Bittles,et al.  Reproductive behavior and health in consanguineous marriages , 1991, Science.

[28]  T. Sepora,et al.  Language and Culture , 2012 .

[29]  C. Hutton,et al.  Visual Attention to the Periphery Is Enhanced in Congenitally Deaf Individuals , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Changes in the Spatial Distribution of Visual Attention after Early Deafness , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  E. Schegloff.  Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation , 1992, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  E. Schegloff,et al.  The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation , 1977 .

[33]  Florence Oloff.  Embodied withdrawal after overlap resolution , 2013 .

[34]  Adam Schembri,et al.  Mouth gestures in British Sign Language , 2013 .

[35]  Ulrike Zeshan,et al.  Interrogative Constructions in Signed Languages: Crosslinguistic Perspectives , 2004 .

[36]  María Ignacia Massone,et al.  Lengua de señas argentina : análisis y vocabulario bilingüe , 1994 .

[37]  Leslie C. Aiello,et al.  Wenner‐Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research , 2018, The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology.