Case study: evaluation of streamflow partitioning methods.

Understanding water flow and its relative quantities through different pathways is vital for watershed management. Like many problems in hydrology, numbers of methods have been proposed for streamflow partitioning. Five methods were identified as being the most relevant and least input intensive. This study tested performance of these methods against separately measured surface and subsurface flow data from the coastal plain physiographic region of the southeastern United States. Separately measured surface and subsurface flow were collected for 12 years (1970-1981) in a field scale watershed by the Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory of the USDA-Agricultural Research Service. Results of comparative analysis indicated that Method IV performed the best. Results also indicated that accuracy of this method is highly dependent upon the proper estimation of the "fraction coefficient" that is based on many physical and hydrologic characteristics of the watershed. This study concluded that deterministic/empirical methods such as Boughton's Method IV, require proper parameter value for increased accuracy.

[1]  D. Walling,et al.  VARIATIONS IN THE NATURAL CHEMICAL CONCENTRATION OF RIVER WATER DURING FLOOD FLOWS, AND THE LAG EFFECT: SOME FURTHER COMMENTS , 1975 .

[2]  Murugesu Sivapalan,et al.  Watershed groundwater balance estimation using streamflow recession analysis and baseflow separation , 1999 .

[3]  J. Nash.  A unit hydrograph study, with particular reference to British catchments [Discussion] , 1960 .

[4]  Joseph M. Sheridan,et al.  Nutrient Movement in Streamflow from Agricultural Watersheds in the Georgia Coastal Plain , 1979 .

[5]  Tg Chapman,et al.  Baseflow Separation - Comparison of Numerical Methods with Tracer Experiments , 1996 .

[6]  H. Wittenberg.  Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes , 1999 .

[7]  Adel Shirmohammadi,et al.  Evaluation of Streamflow Partitioning Methods , 2003 .

[8]  Kelsey J. Sinclair,et al.  The use of stream flow routing for direct channel precipitation with isotopically-based hydrograph separations: the role of new water in stormflow generation , 2003 .

[9]  Bertram S. Barnes.  The structure of discharge-recession curves , 1939 .

[10]  F. Djodjic,et al.  Scaling issues in sustainable management of nutrient losses , 2005 .

[11]  A. Jakeman,et al.  How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model? , 1993 .

[12]  Tom G. Chapman,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for stream flow recession and baseflow separation , 1999 .

[13]  T. McMahon,et al.  Evaluation of automated techniques for base flow and recession analyses , 1990 .

[14]  M. A. Kohler,et al.  Hydrology for engineers , 1958 .

[15]  M. Sklash,et al.  The Role Of Groundwater In Storm Runoff , 1979 .

[16]  Weiming Ke,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers and Scientists , 2008, Technometrics.

[17]  Richard H. Hawkins,et al.  Classification of environmental hydrologic behaviors in the northeastern United States , 1993 .

[18]  Application of a conceptual method for separating runoff components in daily hydrographs in Kimakia forest catchments, Kenya , 1999 .

[19]  R. Lyman Ott.,et al.  An introduction to statistical methods and data analysis , 1977 .

[20]  M. Parlange,et al.  Baseflow separation based on analytical solutions of the Boussinesq equation , 1998 .

[21]  N. Su.  The unit hydrograph model for hydrograph separation , 1995 .

[22]  P. Meyboom,et al.  Estimating ground‐water recharge from stream hydrographs , 1961 .

[23]  S. Seetharaman,et al.  A note on Barnes' method of hydrograph separation , 1969 .

[24]  V. Smakhtin.  Low flow hydrology: a review , 2001 .

[25]  K. Singh,et al.  Some Factors Affecting Baseflow , 1968 .

[26]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  An approximate method for partitioning daily streamflow data , 1984 .

[27]  Kyle R. Mankin,et al.  WATERSHED AND LAKE WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT: AN INTEGRATED MODELING APPROACH 1 , 1999 .

[28]  D. Hughes,et al.  Continuous baseflow separation from time series of daily and monthly streamflow data , 2004 .

[29]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers and Scientists , 2003 .

[30]  W. G. Knisel,et al.  REGIONAL APPLICATION OF AN APPROXIMATE STREAMFLOW PARTITIONING METHOD1 , 1987 .

[31]  C. Borror.  An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis, 5th Ed. , 2002 .

[32]  W. C. Bughton.  Partitioning streamflow by computer , 1988 .

[33]  A. Nejadhashemi,et al.  Hydrograph Separation by Incorporating Climatological Factors: Application to Small Experimental Watersheds 1 , 2007 .