Identifying important package features of milk desserts using free listing and word association

Identifying the package and label features that are most relevant for consumer might provide useful information for designing a food package that closely matches consumer needs and expectations. In the present work two groups of 100 milk dessert consumers were asked to elicit package and label features of milk desserts using word association and free listing. Both methodologies were useful, efficient and quick methods to determine package and label features most likely to influence consumer perception of milk desserts. Although some differences were found between them, results related to the design of milk dessert packages were similar and suggested that brand, package shape, colour, and the design of the label might be the most relevant features that should be taken into account during package design of this food product. Cluster analysis of participants enabled the identification of groups of consumers that might be driven by different package features when making their purchase decisions of milk desserts.

[1]  Richard A. Krueger,et al.  Focus group interviewing , 1994 .

[2]  Sven Modell,et al.  Triangulation between case study and survey methods in management accounting research: An assessment of validity implications , 2005 .

[3]  Fahri Karakaya,et al.  A cross-cultural exploration of attitudes toward product expiration dates , 2005 .

[4]  U. Enneking,et al.  How important intrinsic and extrinsic product attributes affect purchase decision , 2007 .

[5]  C. McDaniel,et al.  Convenience Food Packaging and the Perception of Product Quality , 1977 .

[6]  L. B. Acebrón,et al.  The importance of intrinsic and extrinsic cues to expected and experienced quality: an empirical application for beef , 2000 .

[7]  James U. McNeal,et al.  Children’s visual memory of packaging , 2003 .

[8]  Lorand B. Szalay,et al.  Subjective meaning and culture : an assessment through word associations , 1978 .

[9]  D. Valentin,et al.  Perceptual dimensions of tactile textures. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[10]  Hutchings.  Expectations and the Food Industry: The Impact of Color and Appearance , 2003 .

[11]  A. Giménez,et al.  CONSUMER ATTITUDE TOWARD SHELF-LIFE LABELING : DOES IT INFLUENCE ACCEPTANCE? , 2008 .

[12]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[13]  S. Jaeger.  Non-sensory factors in sensory science research , 2006 .

[14]  Liisa Lähteenmäki,et al.  Exploring consumers perceptions of local food with two different qualitative techniques: Laddering and word association , 2006 .

[15]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  An investigation using the repertory grid and focus group methods of the package features affecting consumer perception of fuit juice , 1999 .

[16]  H. V. Trijp,et al.  Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: a critical review of methods and techniques , 2005 .

[17]  R. C. Stokes.  THE EFFECTS OF PRICE, PACKAGE DESIGN, AND BRAND FAMILIARITY ON PERCEIVED QUALITY. , 1974 .

[18]  Alain Clémence,et al.  The Quantitative Analysis Of Social Representations , 1993 .

[19]  Natalia Vila,et al.  Consumer perceptions of product packaging , 2006 .

[20]  Solomon E. Asch,et al.  The Legacy of Solomon Asch : essays in cognition and social psychology , 1992 .

[21]  John A. Bower,et al.  Effect of liking, information and consumer characteristics on purchase intention and willingness to pay more for a fat spread with a proven health benefit , 2003 .

[22]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Understanding consumers perception of conventional and functional yogurts using word association and hard laddering , 2008 .

[23]  Gastón Ares,et al.  Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques , 2010 .

[24]  N. Henley.  A psychological study of the semantics of animal terms , 1969 .

[25]  David Marshall,et al.  Examining the relationship between product package colour and product selection in preschoolers , 2006 .

[26]  G. Hough,et al.  Free listing: A method to gain initial insight of a food category , 2010 .

[27]  H. J. H. MacFie,et al.  Measurement of Food Preferences , 1994 .

[28]  G. Wadsworth.  Hearing midlife voices , 2000 .

[29]  Paul Rozin,et al.  Simultaneous and temporal contextual influences on food acceptance , 1993 .

[30]  M. D. Guàrdia,et al.  Consumer attitude towards store brands , 2000 .

[31]  J. Makens,et al.  Effect of brand preference upon consumers' perceived taste of turkey meat. , 1965, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  W. Verbeke,et al.  Perception of traditional food products in six European regions using free word association , 2010 .

[33]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  THE GENERATION OF SENSORY EXPECTATION BY EXTERNAL CUES AND ITS EFFECT ON SENSORY PERCEPTION AND HEDONIC RATINGS: A REVIEW , 1996 .

[34]  W. Wagner,et al.  Relevance, discourse and the ‘hot’ stable core social representations—A structural analysis of word associations , 1996 .

[35]  JAN-BENEDICT STEENKAMP,et al.  Attribute Elicitation in Marketing Research: A Comparison of Three Procedures , 1997 .

[36]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  USE OF COMPUTER‐GENERATED IMAGES AND CONJOINT ANALYSIS TO INVESTIGATE SENSORY EXPECTATIONS , 2003 .

[37]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  Labelling effects on consumer intention to purchase for soybean oil , 2005 .

[38]  Rosires Deliza,et al.  The Effect of Extrinsic Product Attributes of Pineapple Juice on Consumer Intention to Purchase , 2010 .

[39]  H. Bernard.  Research Methods in Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1988 .

[40]  Norbert Schmitt,et al.  Quantifying word association responses: what is native-like? , 1998 .