The role of preoperative ureteral stenting in retrograde intrarenal surgery in renal stone patients: a propensity score-matched study

Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of preoperative ureteral stenting on retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Methods We retrospectively analyzed RIRS cases from October 2014 to June 2017. Patients were divided into two groups according to preoperative ureteral stent insertion. The characteristics of the patients [age, body mass index (BMI), sex, previous disease history, hemoglobin, creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)], characters of stone (size, number, density, location), ureteral access sheath (UAS) success rate, perioperative complication, operative time, hospitalization time, period with stent, postoperative urinary tract infection (UTI) rate, stone free rate (SFR), and additional treatment rate were analyzed. Results RIRS was performed for 122 patients. Seventy-three patients had preoperative ureteral stents before RIRS, while 49 patients did not have preoperative ureteral stents. The median size of the stone was 14.5 mm. Overall SFR was 87.7%. Preoperative eGFR was relatively high in patients who underwent preoperative stenting (68.18 vs. 79.01 mL/min/1.73 m2, P=0.042). Preoperative stenting led to improvement in the success rate of UAS insertion (97.3% vs. 87.8%, P=0.038) during surgery. Before and after propensity score matching revealed a significant difference in operation time when the diameter of the stone was smaller than 1 cm (P=0.019 and P=0.004). However, there was no significant difference in operation time, postoperative UTI rate, additional treatment rate, or SFR. Conclusions Preoperative ureteral stenting can facilitate UAS insertion, and reduce operation time in RIRS for stones with a diameter less than 1 cm.

[1]  P. Han,et al.  Preoperative double-J stent placement can improve the stone-free rate for patients undergoing ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Urolithiasis.

[2]  Yuchao Lu,et al.  Flexible ureteroscopy for renal stone without preoperative ureteral stenting shows good prognosis , 2016, PeerJ.

[3]  M. Bultitude,et al.  Contemporary Management of Stone Disease: The New EAU Urolithiasis Guidelines for 2015. , 2016, European urology.

[4]  G. Preminger,et al.  Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy , 2016, Nature Reviews Urology.

[5]  A. Crisci,et al.  Preoperative JJ stent placement in ureteric and renal stone treatment: results from the Clinical Research Office of Endourological Society (CROES) ureteroscopy (URS) Global Study , 2015, BJU international.

[6]  T. Knoll,et al.  The new concept of ureteral access sheath with guidewire disengagement: One wire does it all , 2016, World journal of urology.

[7]  SoferMario,et al.  Predicting an effective ureteral access sheath insertion: a bicenter prospective study. , 2014 .

[8]  D. Lifshitz,et al.  Predicting an effective ureteral access sheath insertion: a bicenter prospective study. , 2014, Journal of endourology.

[9]  N. Buchholz,et al.  The difficult ureter: stent and come back or balloon dilate and proceed with ureteroscopy? What does the evidence say? , 2014, Urology.

[10]  A. Gross,et al.  Impact of Preoperative Ureteral Stenting on Stone-free Rates of Ureteroscopy for Nephroureterolithiasis : A Matched-paired Analysis of 286 Patients ( Urology 2012 ; 80 : 1214-1220 ) , 2013 .

[11]  A. Miernik,et al.  Standardized flexible ureteroscopic technique to improve stone-free rates. , 2012, Urology.

[12]  Y. Kubota,et al.  Preoperative stenting for ureteroscopic lithotripsy for a large renal stone , 2012, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.

[13]  P. Thelen,et al.  Impact of ureteral stenting prior to ureterorenoscopy on stone-free rates and complications , 2011, World Journal of Urology.

[14]  M. Desai,et al.  Flexible ureterorenoscopy , 2011, BJU international.

[15]  Kevan M. Sternberg,et al.  Preoperative stenting decreases operative time and reoperative rates of ureteroscopy. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[16]  G. Preminger,et al.  Modern applications of ureteroscopy for intrarenal stone disease , 2011, Current opinion in urology.

[17]  G. Nabi,et al.  Irrigant flow and intrarenal pressure during flexible ureteroscopy: the effect of different access sheaths, working channel instruments, and hydrostatic pressure. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[18]  O. Gómez-Marín,et al.  Impact of preoperative ureteral stenting on outcome of ureteroscopic treatment for urinary lithiasis. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[19]  S. Zaslau,et al.  Impact of stone location on success rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis. , 2008, Urology.

[20]  Sangtae Park,et al.  Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. , 2007, Journal of endourology.

[21]  D. Albala,et al.  Effect of ureteral access sheath on stone-free rates in patients undergoing ureteroscopic management of renal calculi. , 2005, Urology.

[22]  M. Monga,et al.  Is there a role for small-diameter ureteral access sheaths? Impact on irrigant flow and intrapelvic pressures. , 2004, Urology.

[23]  G. Preminger,et al.  Ureteral access sheath provides protection against elevated renal pressures during routine flexible ureteroscopic stone manipulation. , 2004, Journal of endourology.

[24]  Robert C. Smith,et al.  Normal ureter size on unenhanced helical CT. , 2004, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  Jaime Landman,et al.  Ureteral access strategies: pro-access sheath. , 2004, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[26]  Manoj Monga,et al.  Characterization of intrapelvic pressure during ureteropyeloscopy with ureteral access sheaths. , 2003, Urology.

[27]  D. Bagley,et al.  Flexible ureteropyeloscopy: diagnosis and treatment in the upper urinary tract. , 1987, The Journal of urology.