Spontaneous versus Reinforced Olfactory Discriminations

When the major response domains in the rat olfactory bulb that are evoked by odorant enantiomers are compared, some of these odorant pairs do not show significantly different activity patterns. Such pairs are not spontaneously discriminated in a behavioral test. We show here that even these similar odorants appear to evoke different activity patterns when every data point in a glomerular activity array is compared. These odorants also can be discriminated if they are subjected to differential reinforcement. These data suggest that the method chosen to assess olfactory discrimination will reveal different olfactory capabilities of rats. The small differences in glomerular activity that probably exist between any pair of odorants may serve as a basis for odor discrimination when rats are differentially reinforced, thereby establishing the remarkable limits of rat olfactory perception. At the same time, the major differences in glomerular responses appear to serve as the normal basis for spontaneous odor discrimination.

[1]  Thomas A. Cleland,et al.  Behavioral models of odor similarity. , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[2]  G M Shepherd,et al.  Functional mosaic organization of mouse olfactory receptor neurons. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  B. Smith,et al.  Generalization Between Binary Odor Mixtures and Their Components in the Rat , 1999, Physiology and Behavior.

[4]  C. Galizia,et al.  Enantioselectivity of odor perception in honeybees (Apis mellifera carnica). , 2001, Behavioral neuroscience.

[5]  Lawrence C. Katz,et al.  Spatial coding of enantiomers in the rat olfactory bulb , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Laska,et al.  Olfactory discrimination ability of human subjects for ten pairs of enantiomers. , 1999, Chemical senses.

[7]  Michael E Hasselmo,et al.  Behavioral Responses to Aliphatic Aldehydes Can Be Predicted From Known Electrophysiological Responses of Mitral Cells in the Olfactory Bulb , 1999, Physiology & Behavior.

[8]  S. Paradiso,et al.  Neural mechanisms of anhedonia in schizophrenia: a PET study of response to unpleasant and pleasant odors. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  Michael Leon,et al.  Perceptual Correlates of Neural Representations Evoked by Odorant Enantiomers , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Laska,et al.  Enantioselectivity of odor perception in squirrel monkeys and humans. , 1999, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology.

[11]  M. Leon,et al.  Modular representations of odorants in the glomerular layer of the rat olfactory bulb and the effects of stimulus concentration , 2000, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  R. Menzel,et al.  Olfactory discrimination ability and odor structure-activity relationships in honeybees. , 1999, Chemical senses.

[13]  M. Leon,et al.  Multidimensional chemotopic responses to n‐aliphatic acid odorants in the rat olfactory bulb , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  D. Guadagni,et al.  Evidence for the Difference between the Odours of the Optical Isomers (+)- and (−)-Carvone , 1971, Nature.

[15]  Thomas A Cleland,et al.  Behavioral models of odor similarity. , 2002, Behavioral neuroscience.

[16]  H. Scheich,et al.  New Insights into the Hemodynamic Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Response through Combination of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Optical Recording in Gerbil Barrel Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  U Homberg,et al.  Immunocytochemistry of GABA in the central complex of the locust Schistocerca gregaria: Identification of immunoreactive neurons and colocalization with neuropeptides , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[18]  L Friedman,et al.  Odor Incongruity and Chirality , 1971, Science.

[19]  B. Slotnick,et al.  Olfaction in rats with extensive lesions of the olfactory bulbs: implications for odor coding , 1998, Neuroscience.

[20]  Burton Slotnick,et al.  Animal cognition and the rat olfactory system , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.