COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L.)

Abstract This paper reviews the origins and general botany of Phaseolus vulgaris , the different cropping systems used for bean production, the agronomic and biological factors which most limit crop yield, and the strategies for improvement in this crop. While the common bean originated in the Americas, it is now grown widely in both the old- and the new world and in Africa, with the most suitable ideotype, and the disease and insect resistance factors needed for a particular production area, dependent on local conditions. Marked color and seed-type preferences further complicate the breeding and adoption of new varieties. The paper considers both conventional approaches and marker-assisted methods for breeding in this crop. The common bean is a crop with multiple disease and insect pests, and the ability to quickly and effectively select plants carrying multiple or different types of resistance gene is essential to an orderly and efficient processing of progeny.

[1]  T. Abate,et al.  Insect pests of beans in Africa: their ecology and management. , 1996, Annual review of entomology.

[2]  F. Morales,et al.  Comparative responses of selected Phaseolus vulgaris germ plasm inoculated artificially and naturally with bean golden mosaic virus , 1988 .

[3]  P. Graham Some problems of nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in Phaseolus vulgaris L.: A review , 1981 .

[4]  K. Waldron,et al.  Hard‐to‐cook phenomenon in beans: Changes in antinutrient factors and nitrogenous compounds during storage , 1995 .

[5]  M. Corrales,et al.  Breeding for disease resistance. , 1991 .

[6]  M. Corrales,et al.  Bean Production Problems in the Tropics , 1989 .

[7]  A. Molina,et al.  Genetic Diversity in Cultivated Common Bean: II. Marker‐Based Analysis of Morphological and Agronomic Traits , 1991 .

[8]  H. Schwartz,et al.  Selection for Resistance to Xanthomonas phaseoli in Dry Beans1 , 1980 .

[9]  M. Liebman,et al.  Dry Bean Responses to Nitrogen Fertilizer in Two Tillage and Residue Management Systems , 1995 .

[10]  A. V. Schoonhoven,et al.  Common beans : Research for crop improvement , 1991 .

[11]  Shree P. Singh,et al.  Genetic Diversity in Cultivated Common Bean: I. Allozymes , 1991 .

[12]  D. Boulter,et al.  Role of carbohydrates in insect resistance in Phaseolus vulgaris , 1987 .

[13]  Shree P. Singh,et al.  Combining Ability Analyses and Relationships Among Yield, Yield Components, and Architectural Traits in Dry Bean 1 , 1986 .

[14]  M. Pastor-Corrales,et al.  Bean accessions with resistance to Rhizoctonia solani under field conditions in Colombia. , 1988 .

[15]  J. Tu,et al.  Mycoflora and mycotoxins in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) produced in Taiwan and in Ontario, Canada , 1995 .

[16]  P. Gepts Genetic resources of Phaseolus beans : their maintenance, domestication, evolution, and utilization , 1988 .

[17]  M. W. Adams,et al.  Registration of C-20 Navy Bean , 1984 .

[18]  P. Ranalli Improvement of pulse crops in Europe , 1995 .

[19]  J. Mayer,et al.  α-Amylase inhibitors in resistance of common beans to the Mexican bean weevil and the bean weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) , 1996 .

[20]  P. Gepts,et al.  F1 hybrid weakness in the common bean , 1985 .

[21]  E. D. Quintela,et al.  Controle do caruncho Zabrotes subfasciatus (Bohemann, 1833) (Coleoptera-Bruchidae) pelo uso de proteína da semente em linhagens quase-isogênicas do feijoeiro , 1995 .

[22]  F. Bliss,et al.  Insecticidal Activity and Lectin Homology of Arcelin Seed Protein , 1988, Science.

[23]  J. Kigel,et al.  Differential sensitivity to high temperature of stages in the reproductive development of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) , 1994 .

[24]  J. B. McElroy Breeding dry beans, Phaseolus vulgaris L., for common bacterial blight resistance derived from Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray , 1986 .

[25]  W. D. Hanson The Breakup of Initial Linkage Blocks under Selected Mating Systems. , 1959, Genetics.

[26]  M. Blair,et al.  Occurrence of Bean Golden Mosaic Virus in Florida. , 1995 .

[27]  M. Corrales,et al.  Root rots of beans in Latin America and Africa: diagnosis, research methodologies, and management strategies , 1990 .

[28]  J. Stavely,et al.  New Pathogenic Variability in Uromyces appendiculatus in North America , 1989 .

[29]  M. Pastor-Corrales,et al.  Reactions of selected bean germ plasms to infection by Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. phaseoli. , 1987 .

[30]  J. Tu,et al.  Comparison of the profiles of seedborne fungi and the occurrence of aflatoxins in mould-damaged beans and soybeans. , 1995, Microbios.

[31]  D. Debouck Systematics and morphology. , 1991 .

[32]  M. Pastor-Corrales,et al.  Reactions of selected bean accessions to infection by Macrophomina phaseolina. , 1988 .

[33]  M. Liebman,et al.  Agronomic and Economic Performance of Conventional vs. Reduced Input Bean Cropping Systems , 1993 .

[34]  C. Cardona,et al.  Breeding for insect resistance in beans. , 1991 .

[35]  J. Duke Handbook of LEGUMES of World Economic Importance , 1982, Springer US.

[36]  M. W. Adams Basis of Yield Component Compensation in Crop Plants With Special Reference to the Field Bean, Phaseolus vulgaris 1 , 1967 .

[37]  P. Gepts,et al.  Origin, domestication, and evolution of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) , 1991 .

[38]  J. Welsh,et al.  Fingerprinting genomes using PCR with arbitrary primers. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[39]  J. Lynch,et al.  Vegetative Growth of the Common Bean in Response to Phosphorus Nutrition , 1991 .

[40]  P. Gepts Genetic Resources of Phaseolus Beans , 1988, Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture.

[41]  S. Honma A BEAN INTERSPECIFIC HYBRID , 1956 .

[42]  D. Lindgren,et al.  Injury and Yield of Leafhopper-infested Dry Beans , 1995 .

[43]  K. Livak,et al.  DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. , 1990, Nucleic acids research.

[44]  P. Graham,et al.  Phosphorus fertilization and symbiotic nitrogen fixation in common bean phaseolus vulgaris , 1979 .

[45]  Shree P. Singh,et al.  Genetics of Seed Yield and its Components in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Middle-American Origin. I. General Combining Ability , 1988 .

[46]  S. Beebe,et al.  Genetic diversity among common bean breeding lines developed for central America , 1995 .

[47]  H. Weigel,et al.  Regression analysis to describe yield and metabolic responses of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) to chronic ozone stress. , 1990 .

[48]  Shree P. Singh,et al.  Genetics of Seed Yield and its Components in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) of Middle-American Origin. II. Genetic Variance, Heritability and Expected Response from Selection , 1988 .

[49]  J. M. Day,et al.  Effects of lime and molybdenum on nodulation and nitrogen fixation of Phaseolus vulgaris L. in acid soils of Brazil. , 1980 .

[50]  J. Steadman,et al.  Sources of Resistance to Common Bacterial Blight and Rust in Elite Phaseolus vulgaris L. Germplasm , 1993 .

[51]  J. Kelly,et al.  RAPD Markers Flanking the Are Gene for Anthracnose Resistance in Common Bean , 1996 .

[52]  J. Beaver,et al.  Comparison of Selection Methods for Dry Bean Populations Derived from Crosses between Gene Pools , 1994 .

[53]  J. Lynch,et al.  Genetic Variation for Phosphorus Efficiency of Common Bean in Contrasting Soil Types: I. Vegetative Response , 1995 .

[54]  C. Cardona,et al.  Resistance to the Bean Weevil and the Mexican Bean Weevil (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Noncultivated Common Bean Accessions , 1983 .

[55]  J. Harlan,et al.  Toward a rational classification of cultivated plants , 1971 .

[56]  P. Gepts,et al.  Hybrid Weakness in Wild Phaseolus Vulgaris L. , 1992 .

[57]  S. Beebe,et al.  AFLP Analysis of Gene Pools of a Wild Bean Core Collection , 1996 .

[58]  F. Manes,et al.  The response of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Lit. to different dosages of the anti-ozonant ethylenediurea (EDU) in relation to chronic treatment with ozone , 1995 .

[59]  E. H. Roberts,et al.  Grain Legume Crops , 1985 .

[60]  J. Steadman,et al.  'Chase' Pinto Dry Bean , 1994 .

[61]  F. Bliss,et al.  Enhancement of Biological Nitrogen Fixation of Common Bean in Latin America , 2012, Developments in Plant and Soil Sciences.

[62]  P. Graham Some problems and potentials of field beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Latin America , 1978 .

[63]  K. Liu,et al.  Cellular, biological, and physicochemical basis for the hard-to-cook defect in legume seeds. , 1995, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[64]  P. Graham,et al.  Nodule development and nitrogen fixation in cultivars of Phaseolus vulgaris L. as influenced by planting density , 1978, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[65]  P. Gepts,et al.  GENETICS OF HEAT TOLERANCE DURING REPRODUCTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN COMMON BEAN , 1994 .

[66]  F. Assis,et al.  Consórcio de milho e feijão em diferentes arranjos e populações de plantas, em Pelotas, RS , 1995 .

[67]  Jhc Davis,et al.  The effects of plant arrangement and density on intercropped beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and maize II. Comparison of relay intercropping and simultaneous planting , 1987 .

[68]  E. Drijfhout Genetic interaction between Phaseolus vulgaris and bean common mosaic virus with implications for strain identification and breeding for resistance , 1978 .

[69]  A. V. Schoonhoven,et al.  Standard system for the evaluation of bean germplasm , 1987 .

[70]  J. Castellanos,et al.  Effects of hardshell character on cooking time of common beans grown in the semiarid highlands of Mexico , 1995 .

[71]  J. D. Kelley Interrelationship of Plant Architecture and Yield Components in the Pinto Bean Ideotype , 1993 .