What you do is who you are: The role of task context in perceived social robot personality

People tend to unconsciously attribute personality traits to all kinds of technology including robots. But what personality do they want robots to have? Previous research has found support for two contradicting theories: similarity attraction and complementary attraction. The similarity attraction theory implies that people prefer a robot with a similar personality to their own (e.g., an extroverted person prefers an extroverted robot). According to the complementary attraction theory, people prefer a robot's personality opposite to their own (e.g., extroverted people prefer an introverted robot). In contrast to both theories, we argue that what is considered an appropriate personality for a robot depends on the task context. In a 2×2 between-groups experiment (N=45), we found trends that indicated similarity attraction for extrovert participants when the robot was a tour guide and complementary attraction for introverted participants when the robot was a cleaner. These trends show that preferences for robot personalities may indeed depend on the context of the robot's role and the stereotype perceptions people hold for certain jobs. Robot behaviors likely need to be adapted not in complimentary or similarity to the users' personality but to the users' expectations about what kind of personality and behaviors are consistent with such a task or role.

[1]  Karl F. MacDorman,et al.  Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  A Cross-cultural Study: Effect of Robot Appearance and Task , 2010, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  Lilia V. Moshkina,et al.  Recognizing Nonverbal Affective Behavior in Humanoid Robots , 2010 .

[4]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[5]  Marc Hanheide,et al.  Evaluating extrovert and introvert behaviour of a domestic robot — a video study , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[6]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Beyond dirty, dangerous and dull: What everyday people think robots should do , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[7]  I. René J. A. te Boekhorst,et al.  Avoiding the uncanny valley: robot appearance, personality and consistency of behavior in an attention-seeking home scenario for a robot companion , 2008, Auton. Robots.

[8]  G. Rubinstein,et al.  The Five Factor Model (FFM) among four groups of male and female professionals , 2007 .

[9]  K. M. Lee,et al.  Can robots manifest personality? : An empirical test of personality recognition, social responses, and social presence in human-robot interaction , 2006 .

[10]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  'Doing the right thing wrong' - Personality and tolerance to uncomfortable robot approaches , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[11]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  What is a robot companion - friend, assistant or butler? , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[12]  John A. Johnson,et al.  Implementing a five-factor personality inventory for use on the internet , 2005 .

[13]  G. Rubinstein,et al.  The big five among male and female students of different faculties , 2005 .

[14]  C. Nass,et al.  Social-Psychological Origins of Feelings of Presence: Creating Social Presence With Machine-Generated Voices , 2005 .

[15]  Ina Fourie,et al.  Librarians and the claiming of new roles: how can we try to make a difference? , 2004, Aslib Proc..

[16]  Illah R. Nourbakhsh,et al.  A survey of socially interactive robots , 2003, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  META‐ANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE FIVE‐FACTOR MODEL OF PERSONALITY AND HOLLAND'S OCCUPATIONAL TYPES , 2003 .

[18]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[19]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Consistency of personality in interactive characters: verbal cues, non-verbal cues, and user characteristics , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  David H. Palmer Investigating Students’ Private Perceptions of Scientists and their Work , 1997 .

[21]  J. Schinka,et al.  Correspondence between five-factor and RIASEC models of personality. , 1997, Journal of personality assessment.

[22]  A. DeLongis,et al.  The interactional context of problem-, emotion-, and relationship-focused coping: the role of the big five personality factors. , 1996, Journal of personality.

[23]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[24]  B. J. Fogg,et al.  Can computer personalities be human personalities? , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  P. Glick,et al.  Images of occupations: Components of gender and status in occupational stereotypes , 1995 .

[26]  R. E. Christal,et al.  Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[27]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[28]  S. F. Broday,et al.  The Relationship between the SCII Introversion-Extroversion Scale and Occupational Scales , 1991 .

[29]  Murray R. Barrick,et al.  THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META-ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[30]  I. Ajzen Attitudes, Personality and Behavior , 1988 .

[31]  L. Gottfredson Circumscription and Compromise: A Developmental Theory of Occupational Aspirations. , 1981 .

[32]  J. Amernic,et al.  A test of Holland's theory in a population of accountants , 1981 .

[33]  J. S. Wiggins,et al.  A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. , 1979 .

[34]  J. Mccroskey,et al.  The measurement of interpersonal attraction , 1974 .

[35]  J. Mccroskey Measurement of the Credibility of Peers and Spouses. , 1973 .

[36]  E. Howarth Expectations concerning Occupations in Relation to Extraversion-Introversion , 1969, Psychological reports.