Changes in immigrants' social integration during the stay in the host country: The case of non-western immigrants in the Netherlands

Previous studies on social integration of immigrants were predominantly of static nature. This article provides a dynamic account by distinguishing differences in social integration that develop shortly after immigrants’ arrival in the host country from changes with length of stay. We examine contacts in leisure time between natives and non-western immigrants in the Netherlands. Theories from research on ethnic intermarriage are applied to these more common forms of contact. We use pooled cross-sectional survey data from 1988–2002. The results show that on average social integration increases with length of stay. Ethnicity, migration motive and home country education account for differences in integration that develop shortly after arrival and are maintained or even increased with length of stay, while the size of the immigrant group matters mainly at entry and then loses its influence over time. Age at migration exclusively explains differences in social integration that develop with length of stay.

[1]  I. Stoop,et al.  The hunt for the last respondent : nonresponse in sample surveys , 2005 .

[2]  Grace S Kao,et al.  Interracial Relationships and the Transition to Adulthood , 2005 .

[3]  George J. Borjas,et al.  Assimilation, Changes in Cohort Quality, and the Earnings of Immigrants , 1985, Journal of Labor Economics.

[4]  R. Alba,et al.  Remaking the American Mainstream: Assimilation and Contemporary Immigration , 2003 .

[5]  R. Sáenz,et al.  The Problem Posed by Immigrants Married Abroad on Intermarriage Research: The Case of Asian Americans 1 , 1990, The International migration review.

[6]  Mark J. Miller,et al.  The Age of Migration: International Population Movements in the Modern World , 1994 .

[7]  H. G. Werfhorst,et al.  Postimmigration investments in Education: a Study of Immigrants in the Netherlands , 2007, Demography.

[8]  B. Aguirre,et al.  Structural and assimilationist explanations of Asian American intermarriage. , 1997 .

[9]  A. Portes.  Introduction: Immigration and Its Aftermath , 1994 .

[10]  Eric Fong,et al.  Determinants of Friendship Choices in Multiethnic Society , 2000 .

[11]  J. Lievens.  Interethnic Marriage: Bringing in the Context through Multilevel Modelling , 1998, European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie.

[12]  Barry R. Chiswick,et al.  A model of destination-language acquisition: Application to male immigrants in Canada , 2001, Demography.

[13]  T. Pettigrew.  Intergroup contact theory. , 1998, Annual review of psychology.

[14]  P. Scheepers,et al.  Support for ethnic discrimination in the Netherlands 1979-1993: Effects of period, cohort, and individual characteristics , 1998 .

[15]  V. Fu.  Racial intermarriage pairings , 2001, Demography.

[16]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Intermarriage and homogamy: causes, patterns, trends. , 1998, Annual review of sociology.

[17]  Anthony Heath,et al.  Unequal chances: ethnic minorities in Western labour markets , 2007 .

[18]  J. Cobas,et al.  Latinos’ mate selection: national origin, racial, and nativity differences , 2004 .

[19]  Mary E. Campbell,et al.  Beyond Black and White: The Present and Future of Multiracial Friendship Segregation , 2003, American Sociological Review.

[20]  Emi Ooka,et al.  Patterns of Participation in Informal Social Activities among Chinese Immigrants in Toronto 1 , 2006 .

[21]  F. V. Tubergen,et al.  Ethnic intermarriage among immigrants in the Netherlands: An analysis of population data , 2007 .

[22]  L. Sigelman,et al.  Making Contact? Black-White Social Interaction in an Urban Setting , 1996, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  A. Portes,et al.  The New Second Generation: Segmented Assimilation and its Variants , 1993 .

[24]  H. Vermeulen,et al.  Immigrant integration : the Dutch case , 2000 .

[25]  A. Portes.  The new second generation , 1996 .

[26]  G. Āllport.  The Nature of Prejudice , 1954 .

[27]  P. Scheepers,et al.  Verschillen in sociale integratie tussen etnische groepen: beschrijving en verklaring , 2003 .

[28]  T. Espenshade,et al.  An analysis of English-language proficiency among U.S. immigrants. , 1997 .

[29]  Michael J. Rosenfeld.  Measures of Assimilation in the Marriage Market: Mexican Americans 1970–1990 , 2002 .

[30]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[31]  Peter M. Blau,et al.  Crosscutting Social Circles: Testing a Macrostructural Theory of Intergroup Relations , 1984 .

[32]  Michael O. Emerson,et al.  Contact Theory Extended: The Effects of Prior Racial Contact on Current Social Ties , 2002 .

[33]  S. Blair,et al.  Asian American Interracial and Interethnic Marriages: Differences by Education and Nativity 1 , 2001 .

[34]  J. Reitz.  From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America.By Stanley Lieberson and Mary C. Waters. Russell Sage Foundation. 304 pp. $29.95 , 1990 .

[35]  J. M. Tzeng.  Ethnically Heterogamous Marriages: The Case of Asian Canadians* , 2000 .

[36]  J. Dagevos,et al.  Gescheiden Werelden? De Etnische Signatuur van Vrijetijdscontacten van Minderheden , 2005 .

[37]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[38]  W. Vollebergh,et al.  Integrating immigrants in the Netherlands : cultural versus socio-economic integration , 2017 .

[39]  M. Kalmijn,et al.  Ethnic intermarriage in the Netherlands: confirmations and refutations of accepted insights , 2006 .

[40]  H. Flap,et al.  The Economic Incorporation of Immigrants in 18 Western Societies: Origin, Destination, and Community Effects , 2004 .

[41]  Frank van Tubergen,et al.  The Impact of Origin and Host Country Schooling on the Economic Performance of Immigrants , 2009 .

[42]  From Many Strands: Ethnic and Racial Groups in Contemporary America. , 1990 .

[43]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[44]  A. Kulczycki,et al.  Patterns, Determinants, and Implications of Intermarriage Among Arab Americans , 2002 .