A method for improved standardization of in vivo calcaneal time-domain speed-of-sound measurements

Although calcaneal speed of sound (SOS) is an effective predictor of osteoporotic fracture risk, clinical SOS measurements exhibit a high degree of inter-system variability. Calcaneal SOS is usually computed from time-of-flight measurements of broadband ultrasound pulses that propagate through the foot. In order to minimize the effects of multi-path interference, many investigators measure time-of-flight from markers near the leading edge of the pulse. The calcaneus is a highly attenuating, highly inhomogeneous bone that distorts propagating ultrasound pulses via frequency-dependent attenuation, reverberation, dispersion, multiple scattering, and refraction. This pulse distortion can produce errors in leading-edge transit-time marker-based SOS measurements. In this paper, an equation to predict dependence of time-domain SOS measurements on system parameters (center frequency and bandwidth), transit-time marker location, and bone properties (attenuation coefficient and thickness) is validated with through-transmission measurements in a bone-mimicking phantom and in 73 women in vivo, using a clinical bone sonometer. In order to test the utility of the formula for suppressing system dependence of SOS measurements, a wideband laboratory data acquisition system was used to make a second set of through-transmission measurements on the phantom. The compensation formula reduced system-dependent leading-edge transit-time marker-based SOS measurements in the phantom from 41 m/s to 5 m/s and reduced average transit-time marker-related SOS variability in 73 women from 40 m/s to 10 m/s. The compensation formula can be used to improve standardization in bone sonometry.

[1]  K. Wear.  The dependence of time-domain speed-of-sound measurements on center frequency, bandwidth, and transit-time marker in human calcaneus in vitro. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  R C Wray.  The time has come. , 1986, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[3]  G Van der Perre,et al.  A comparison of time-domain and frequency-domain approaches to ultrasonic velocity measurement in trabecular bone. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Suk Wang Yoon,et al.  Acoustic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone: application of the Modified Biot-Attenborough model. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  J. Jurvelin,et al.  Calcaneal ultrasound predicts early postmenopausal fractures as well as axial BMD. A prospective study of 422 women , 2004, Osteoporosis International.

[6]  H. Trębacz,et al.  Ultrasound Velocity and Attenuation in Cancellous Bone Samples from Lumbar Vertebra and Calcaneus , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[7]  I. Kiviranta,et al.  Prediction of density and mechanical properties of human trabecular bone in vitro by using ultrasound transmission and backscattering measurements at 0.2–6.7 MHz frequency range , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Y. Yamato,et al.  Distribution of longitudinal wave properties in bovine cortical bone in vitro. , 2006, Ultrasonics.

[9]  D. Deligianni,et al.  Characterization of dense bovine cancellous bone tissue microstructure by ultrasonic backscattering using weak scattering models. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  J. Rho,et al.  Low-megahertz ultrasonic properties of bovine cancellous bone. , 2000, Bone.

[11]  K. Wear,et al.  The effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and dispersion on sound speed measurements: applications in human trabecular bone , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[12]  F. Padilla,et al.  Effects of frequency-dependent attenuation and velocity dispersion on in vitro ultrasound velocity measurements in intact human femur specimens , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[13]  R. S. Siffert,et al.  Influence of marrow on ultrasonic velocity and attenuation in bovine trabecular bone , 1996, Calcified Tissue International.

[14]  R. Strelitzki.  On the measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in the os calcis using short pulses , 1996 .

[15]  G Lowet,et al.  Assessment of the strength of the proximal femur in vitro: relationship with ultrasonic measurements of the calcaneus. , 1997, Bone.

[16]  James A. Zagzebski,et al.  Ultrasound transmission measurements through the os calcis , 1991, Calcified Tissue International.

[17]  J. Rho,et al.  Effect of Collagen and Mineral Content on the High-Frequency Ultrasonic Properties of Human Cancellous Bone , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  Kang I L Lee,et al.  Correlations between acoustic properties and bone density in bovine cancellous bone from 0.5 to 2 MHz. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  J.J. Kaufman,et al.  Ultrasonic assessment of human and bovine trabecular bone: a comparison study , 1996, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  C. M. Langton,et al.  Prediction of Human Femoral Bone Strength Using Ultrasound Velocity and BMD: An In Vitro Study , 1997, Osteoporosis International.

[21]  S. Giannini,et al.  Quantitative heel ultrasound in a population-based study in Italy and its relationship with fracture history: the ESOPO study , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[22]  G. Blake,et al.  Contact Quantitative Ultrasound: An Evaluation of Precision, Fracture Discrimination, Age-Related Bone Loss and Applicability of the WHO Criteria , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[23]  R. Rizzoli,et al.  Comparison of Three Bone Ultrasounds for the Discrimination of Subjects With and Without Osteoporotic Fractures Among 7562 Elderly Women , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  C F Njeh,et al.  Orthogonal relationships between ultrasonic velocity and material properties of bovine cancellous bone. , 1996, Medical engineering & physics.

[25]  C. Glüer.  Quantitative Ultrasound--it is time to focus research efforts. , 2007, Bone.

[26]  P. Laugier,et al.  Velocity dispersion of acoustic waves in cancellous bone , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[27]  P. Laugier,et al.  Ultrasound images of the os calcis: a new method of assessment of bone status , 1993 .

[28]  Reinhard Barkmann,et al.  Association of Five Quantitative Ultrasound Devices and Bone Densitometry With Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures in a Population‐Based Sample: The OPUS Study , 2004, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[29]  R. Siffert,et al.  Ultrasonic bone assessment: "the time has come". , 2007, Bone.

[30]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound of the Calcaneus Reflects the Mechanical Properties of Calcaneal Trabecular Bone , 1997, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[31]  J. A. Evans,et al.  Dependence of the velocity and attenuation of ultrasound in bone on the mineral content. , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Tainsong Chen,et al.  The measurements of ultrasound parameters on calcaneus by two-sided interrogation techniques , 2005 .

[33]  J. Zagzebski,et al.  Comparison of speed of sound and ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis to bone density of the radius, femur and lumbar spine. , 1989, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[34]  P Rüegsegger,et al.  Do quantitative ultrasound measurements reflect structure independently of density in human vertebral cancellous bone? , 1998, Bone.

[35]  Florian Hartl,et al.  Prediction of Hip Fracture Risk by Quantitative Ultrasound in More Than 7000 Swiss Women ≥70 Years of Age: Comparison of Three Technologically Different Bone Ultrasound Devices in the SEMOF Study , 2006, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[36]  H. K. Genant,et al.  Comparison of Six Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound Devices: Precision and Hip Fracture Discrimination , 2000, Osteoporosis International.

[37]  G. Breart,et al.  Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: the EPIDOS prospective study , 1996, The Lancet.

[38]  J. Rho,et al.  Effect of marrow on the high frequency ultrasonic properties of cancellous bone. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[39]  C-C Glüer,et al.  In vitro speed of sound measurement at intact human femur specimens. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[40]  D. Hans,et al.  Does follow-up duration influence the ultrasound and DXA prediction of hip fracture? The EPIDOS prospective study. , 2004, Bone.

[41]  K. Wear,et al.  Measurements of phase velocity and group velocity in human calcaneus. , 2000, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[42]  A. J. Clarke,et al.  The measurement of the velocity of ultrasound in fixed trabecular bone using broadband pulses and single-frequency tone bursts. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[43]  J. Taylor,et al.  Quantitative Heel Ultrasound in 3180 Women Between 45 and 75 Years of Age: Compliance, Normal Ranges and Relationship to Fracture History , 1998, Osteoporosis International.

[44]  C. Mautalen,et al.  Ultrasound and dual X-ray absorptiometry densitometry in women with hip fracture , 1995, Calcified Tissue International.

[45]  D. Hans,et al.  Quantitative ultrasound parameters as well as bone mineral density are better predictors of trochanteric than cervical hip fractures in elderly women. Results from the EPIDOS study. , 2005, Bone.

[46]  E. Barrett-Connor,et al.  Prediction of Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal White Women With Peripheral Bone Densitometry: Evidence From the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[47]  C. Turner,et al.  Calcaneal ultrasonic measurements discriminate hip fracture independently of bone mass , 1995, Osteoporosis International.

[48]  Y.-X. Qin,et al.  Bone surface topology mapping and its role in trabecular bone quality assessment using scanning confocal ultrasound , 2007, Osteoporosis International.

[49]  F Duboeuf,et al.  Ultrasound discriminates patients with hip fracture equally well as dual energy X‐ray absorptiometry and independently of bone mineral density , 1995, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[50]  G Berger,et al.  In vitro assessment of the relationship between acoustic properties and bone mass density of the calcaneus by comparison of ultrasound parametric imaging and quantitative computed tomography. , 1997, Bone.

[51]  C F Njeh,et al.  The effect of cortical endplates on ultrasound velocity through the calcaneus: an in vitro study. , 1997, The British journal of radiology.

[52]  B Bianco,et al.  Computational methods for ultrasonic bone assessment. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.