Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration

Abstract This paper reports a study of how stress and two types of focus affect the durational correlates of phonemic contrasts. Specifically, it examines how vowel durations and formants are affected by quantity differences and by the voicing on a following obstruent, when the vowels are in stressed or unstressed syllables, when the word is focused, as well as when it is the subject of explicit segmental focus contrasting it with another member of a minimal pair. Results find both a quantity and a voicing effect on vowel durations, though these two effects differ as to how they interact with stress and focus. Quantity effects are increased by stress and segmental focus, while voicing effects are generally unaffected by stress and focus, suggesting that voicing effects are not phonemically specified, while quantity differences are. Stress increases durations and reduces undershoot in addition to increasing the amount of quantity contrast. Lexical focus generally has the effect of increasing F 1, and segmental focus on quantity contrasts increases differences in duration, while segmental focus on voicing increases vowel durations in general. Both kinds of focus are less consistent across speakers than is stress. These results are discussed with respect to how speech behavior is conventionalized with respect to a linguistic code.

[1]  Matthew Y. Chen Vowel Length Variation as a Function of the Voicing of the Consonant Environment , 1970 .

[2]  K. Harris Vowel Duration Change and Its Underlying Physiological Mechanisms , 1978, Language and speech.

[3]  John Walker,et al.  Elements of elocution, 1781 , 1969 .

[4]  K. D. Jong,et al.  Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody , 1999 .

[5]  W R TIFFANY,et al.  Nonrandom sources of variation in vowel quality. , 1959, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[6]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Temporal Compensation and Universal Phonetics , 1980 .

[7]  K. D. Jong The supraglottal articulation of prominence in English: Linguistic stress as localized hyperarticulation , 1995 .

[8]  Fares Mitleb Voicing effect on vowel duration is not an absolute universal , 1984 .

[9]  Matthew P. Aylett,et al.  Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences , 1999 .

[10]  M. Beckman,et al.  The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  B. Lindblom Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction , 1963 .

[12]  J Vincent,et al.  What is the smallest prosodic domain , 1994 .

[13]  Daniel Jones An outline of English phonetics , 1956 .

[14]  Robert A. Dalrymple,et al.  A very‐wide‐angle acoustic model for underwater sound propagation , 1990 .

[15]  M. Munro,et al.  Productions of English Vowels by Native Speakers of Arabic: Acoustic Measurements and Accentedness Ratings , 1993, Language and speech.

[16]  Raymond D. Kent,et al.  Effects of Stress Contrasts on Certain Articulatory Parameters , 1971, Phonetica.

[17]  F. Mitleb Voicing effect on vowel duration is not an absolute universal , 1982 .

[18]  Beckman,et al.  Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Articulatory evidence for differentiating stress categories , 1994 .

[19]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  STRESS, PHONOLOGICAL FOCUS, QUANTITY, AND VOICING EFFECTS ON VOWEL DURATION IN AMMANI ARABIC , 1999 .

[20]  R. Port,et al.  Cross-Language Phonetic Interference: Arabic to English , 1981 .

[21]  Mee-Jin Ahn Phonetic and Functional Bases of Syllable Weight for Stress Assignment , 2000 .

[22]  J. Harrington,et al.  Coarticulation and the accented/unaccented distinction: evidence from jaw movement data , 1995 .

[23]  Kenneth de Jong,et al.  An Articulatory Study of Consonant-Induced Vowel Duration Changes in English , 1991 .

[24]  Rebecca Herman Syntactically-Governed Accentuation in Balinese , 1997 .

[25]  O. Engstrand,et al.  Articulatory correlates of stress and speaking rate in Swedish VCV utterances. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  P. Denes Effect of Duration on the Perception of Voicing , 1955 .

[27]  S. M. Sapon,et al.  Note on Vowel Duration Seen Cross‐Linguistically , 1958 .

[28]  Fares Mitleb Vowel length contrast in Arabic and English: A spectrographic test , 1983 .

[29]  Fares Mitleb,et al.  Vowel length contrast in Arabic and English: a spectrographic test , 1984 .

[30]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Explaining Phonetic Variation: A Sketch of the H&H Theory , 1990 .

[31]  W. V. Summers Effects of stress and final-consonant voicing on vowel production: articulatory and acoustic analyses. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  Patricia A. Keating Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III , 1994 .

[33]  M. Beckman,et al.  Manner and place conflicts in the articulation of accent in Australian English , 2001 .