The treaty management organization established under the UNFCCC and the Paris Agreement: an international actor in its own right?

[1]  Thom Gehring,et al.  Member-dominated international organizations as actors: a bottom-up theory of corporate agency , 2022, International Theory.

[2]  J. Elsässer,et al.  Orchestrating Global Climate Governance Through Data: The UNFCCC Secretariat and the Global Climate Action Platform , 2022, Global Environmental Politics.

[3]  A. Kalfagianni,et al.  The politics of multilateral environmental agreements lessons from 20 years of INEA , 2022, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[4]  J. Depledge,et al.  Glass half full or glass half empty?: the 2021 Glasgow Climate Conference , 2022, Climate Policy.

[5]  Jean-Frédéric Morin,et al.  Design Trade-Offs Under Power Asymmetry: COPs and Flexibility Clauses , 2021, Global Environmental Politics.

[6]  M. Cutajar,et al.  Beyond good intentions, to urgent action: Former UNFCCC leaders take stock of thirty years of international climate change negotiations , 2020 .

[7]  T. Kalinowski.  Institutional Innovations and Their Challenges in the Green Climate Fund: Country Ownership, Civil Society Participation and Private Sector Engagement , 2020, Sustainability.

[8]  Chaewoon Oh.  Contestations over the financial linkages between the UNFCCC’s Technology and Financial Mechanism: using the lens of institutional interaction , 2020, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[9]  Selected legal opinions of the Secretariats of the United Nations and related Intergovernmental Organizations , 2020, United Nations Juridical Yearbook.

[10]  L. Rajamani,et al.  THE PARIS RULEBOOK: BALANCING INTERNATIONAL PRESCRIPTIVENESS WITH NATIONAL DISCRETION , 2019, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[11]  Matthias Hofferberth.  Get your Act(ors) Together! Theorizing Agency in Global Governance , 2019 .

[12]  N. Blokker,et al.  International Institutional Law , 2018 .

[13]  S. Oberthür,et al.  Explaining goal achievement in international negotiations: the EU and the Paris Agreement on climate change , 2018 .

[14]  A. Michaelowa,et al.  The growing influence of the UNFCCC Secretariat on the clean development mechanism , 2017, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[15]  T. Hale,et al.  Reversing the Marginalization of Global Environmental Politics in International Relations: An Opportunity for the Discipline , 2017, PS: Political Science & Politics.

[16]  Lukas Hermwille,et al.  UNFCCC before and after Paris – what's necessary for an effective climate regime? , 2017 .

[17]  Si-hun Park.  The power of presidency in UN climate change negotiations: comparison between Denmark and Mexico , 2016, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[18]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance , 2016, International Organization.

[19]  Liesbet Hooghe,et al.  Delegation and pooling in international organizations , 2015 .

[20]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  International Organizations as Orchestrators , 2015 .

[21]  Jessica F. Green,et al.  Protecting Sovereignty, Protecting the Planet: State Delegation to International Organizations and Private Actors in Environmental Politics , 2013 .

[22]  B. Siebenhüner,et al.  Problem solving by international bureaucracies: The influence of international secretariats on world politics , 2013 .

[23]  J. Roberts,et al.  The Politics of International Climate Adaptation Funding: Justice and Divisions in the Greenhouse , 2013, Global Environmental Politics.

[24]  Martin Binder,et al.  International authority and its politicization , 2012, International Theory.

[25]  F. Maes,et al.  Compliance Mechanisms in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: An Effective Way to Improve Compliance? , 2011 .

[26]  Ken Conca.  Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies (review) , 2010, Global Environmental Politics.

[27]  David A. Lake.  Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance , 2010 .

[28]  Dimitrios Katsikas.  Non-state authority and global governance , 2010, Review of International Studies.

[29]  D. Victor,et al.  The Regime Complex for Climate Change , 2010, Perspectives on Politics.

[30]  A. Wiersema.  The New International Law-Makers? Conferences of the Parties to Multilateral Environmental Agreements , 2009 .

[31]  Thom Gehring,et al.  Making an Administrative Trustee Agent Accountable: Reason-Based Decision Making within the Kyoto Protocol’s Clean Development Mechanism , 2009 .

[32]  P. Busch.  The Climate Secretariat: Making a Living in a Straitjacket , 2009 .

[33]  P. Dann,et al.  Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities , 2008, German Law Journal.

[34]  D. Nielson,et al.  Yielding Sovereignty to International Institutions: Bringing System Structure Back In1 , 2008 .

[35]  Thom Gehring,et al.  When Arguments Prevail Over Power: The CITES Procedure for the Listing of Endangered Species , 2008, Global Environmental Politics.

[36]  David A. Lake.  Delegating divisible sovereignty: Sweeping a conceptual minefield , 2007 .

[37]  Judith G. Kelley,et al.  The Concept of International Delegation , 2006 .

[38]  J. Depledge,et al.  The International Climate Change Regime: A Guide to Rules, Institutions and Procedures , 2005 .

[39]  B. Verbeek,et al.  Autonomous policy making by international organizations : Purpose, outline and results , 2003 .

[40]  Jutta Brunnée.  COPing with Consent: Law-Making Under Multilateral Environmental Agreements , 2002, Leiden Journal of International Law.

[41]  R. Churchill,et al.  Autonomous Institutional Arrangements in Multilateral Environmental Agreements: A Little-Noticed Phenomenon in International Law , 2000, American Journal of International Law.

[42]  L. Greene.  EHPnet: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives.

[43]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  The Concept of Legalization , 2000, International Organization.

[44]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Why States Act through Formal International Organizations , 1998 .

[45]  M. Levy,et al.  The Study of International Regimes , 1995 .

[46]  P. David.  Why are institutions the ‘carriers of history’?: Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions , 1994 .

[47]  James K. Sebenius,et al.  Designing Negotiations Toward a New Regime: The Case of Global Warming , 1991 .

[48]  J. T. Shotwell.  International Organization , 1940, World Politics.

[49]  Hermann E. Ott,et al.  Turning Point Glasgow? An Assessment of the Climate Conference COP26 , 2021, Carbon & Climate Law Review.

[50]  Erin R. Graham,et al.  Power, Control, and the Logic of Substitution in Institutional Design: The Case of International Climate Finance , 2020, International Organization.

[51]  N. Karlson.  Explaining Institutional Change , 2018 .

[52]  Alicia Gómez López.  Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power , 2014 .

[53]  A. Wiersema.  The New International LawMakers ? Conferences of the Parties to Multilateral Environmental Agreements , 2013 .

[54]  Phillipa Niland,et al.  Clean Development Mechanism , 2012 .

[55]  L. Massai.  The International Climate Change Regime , 2011 .

[56]  David A. Lake,et al.  Delegation under anarchy: states, international organizations, and principal-agent theory , 2006 .

[57]  M. Finnemore,et al.  Rules for the World: International Organizations in Global Politics , 2004 .

[58]  Hermann E. Ott,et al.  The Kyoto protocol : international climate policy for the 21st century , 1999 .

[59]  Anastasia Telesetsky,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol , 1999 .

[60]  D. Bodansky.  The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A Commentary , 1993 .

[61]  N. Blokker,et al.  International Institutional Law:Unity Within Diversity , 1972 .