Tunneled catheters placed in bone marrow transplant patients: radiological and clinical follow-up results.

PURPOSE To present the radiological and clinical follow-up results of 75 bone marrow transplant patients who underwent fluoroscopy-guided tunneled catheter placement between June 2001 and June 2004. MATERIALS AND METHODS Tunneled catheters were placed in 75 bone marrow transplant patients with fluoroscopic guidance. The left subclavian vein was used in 67 patients, whereas the right side was used in 9. RESULTS The first attempt of catheter insertion was failed in 3 patients who then underwent contralateral catheter placement. No complications were noted during or immediately after the procedures. Late complications included 8 cases of infection, 2 cases of fibrin sheath formation, and 1 case of persistent hiccups, which began at the time of catheter insertion. Inadvertent catheter removal was noted in 4 cases. CONCLUSION Fluoroscopy-guided central venous catheterization should be preferred over the anatomical landmark technique due to its higher technical success rate, shorter procedure time, and lower complication rate. When placing a central venous catheter, multiple factors should be considered, such as catheter type, number of lumens, duration and frequency of pertinent treatments, and patient needs. The procedural and early post-procedural complications were mostly related to the placement technique; however, the late complications could have been prevented by nurse care and patient education.

[1]  H. Wagner,et al.  Central Venous Access Catheters: Radiological Management of Complications , 2003, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[2]  R. Janco,et al.  Complications of central venous access devices in paediatric haemophilia patients , 2003, Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia.

[3]  N. Moureau,et al.  Central venous catheters in home infusion care: outcomes analysis in 50,470 patients. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[4]  Matthew S. Johnson,et al.  Tunneled infusion catheters: increased incidence of symptomatic venous thrombosis after subclavian versus internal jugular venous access. , 2000, Radiology.

[5]  C. So,et al.  Radiologic placement of tunneled central catheters: rates of success and of immediate complications in a large series. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  M. Beheshti,et al.  Long-term results of radiologic placement of a central vein access device. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  A. Yılmazlar,et al.  Complications of 1303 Central Venous Cannulations , 1997, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[8]  T. Ravikumar,et al.  A review of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in oncology patients. , 1995, Surgical oncology clinics of North America.

[9]  E. Kalso A Short History of Central Venous Catheterization , 1985, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[10]  D. Conces,et al.  Aberrant locations and complications in initial placement of subclavian vein catheters. , 1984, Archives of surgery.

[11]  J. Thrall,et al.  Totally implanted drug delivery system for hepatic arterial chemotherapy. , 1981, Cancer treatment reports.

[12]  E. Thomas,et al.  A modified right atrial catheter for access to the venous system in marrow transplant recipients. , 1979, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.

[13]  B. Scribner,et al.  A silicone rubber atrial catheter for prolonged parenteral alimentation. , 1973, Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics.