Spectral analysis of candidates' nonverbal vocal communication: Predicting U.S. presidential election outcomes

Fast Fourier Transform acoustic analysis of the fundamental frequency of candidates’ voices in 19 nationally televised U.S. presidential debates from the eight elections including debates held since 1960, in conjunction with subsequent factor analysis, shows that this nonverbal frequency, below .5 kHz, can reveal the debating candidates’ relative social dominance. Further analysis presents evidence that the candidates’ nonverbal vocalizations offer a precise metric of their relative dominance or commanding presence in the presidential campaign: when this metric is compared statistically with the candidates’ popular vote percentages for the U.S. presidency, it accurately predicts the popular vote outcomes in all of those eight elections.

[1]  P. Ekman,et al.  Nonverbal leakage and clues to deception. , 1969, Psychiatry.

[2]  P. Ekman.  Differential communication of affect by head and body cues. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  L. Sigelman,et al.  Judgments of the Carter-Reagan Debate: The Eyes of the Beholders , 1984 .

[4]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Temporal Symmetry in Microsocial Relations , 1983 .

[5]  J. Cappella.  Mutual influence in expressive behavior: adult--adult and infant--adult dyadic interaction. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  H. Giles,et al.  Contexts of Accommodation , 1993 .

[7]  Allan Mazur,et al.  A Biosocial Model of Status in Face-to-Face Primate Groups , 1985 .

[8]  Jeff Pittam,et al.  The long-term spectrum and perceived emotion , 1990, Speech Commun..

[9]  S. Feldstein,et al.  Rhythms of dialogue , 1970 .

[10]  Stephen Webster,et al.  Verifying the primacy of voice fundamental frequency in social status accommodation , 2001 .

[11]  D. J. Lanoue,et al.  ONE THAT MADE A DIFFERENCE: COGNITIVE CONSISTENCY, POLITICAL KNOWLEDGE, AND THE 1980 PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE , 1992 .

[12]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  Voice pitch and amplitude convergence as a metric of quality in dyadic interviews , 1993 .

[13]  S. W. Gregory.  Social psychological implications of voice frequency correlations: analyzing conversation partner adaptation by computer , 1986 .

[14]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Nonverbal Communication: The Unspoken Dialogue , 1988 .

[15]  R. Sapolsky,et al.  Stress in the wild. , 1990, Scientific American.

[16]  M. Natale.  CONVERGENCE OF MEAN VOCAL INTENSITY IN DYADIC COMMUNICATION AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY , 1975 .

[17]  Jeffery Pittam,et al.  The Long-Term Spectral Measurement of Voice Quality as a Social and Personality Marker: A Review , 1987 .

[18]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Adaptation in Dyadic Interaction: Defining and Operationalizing Patterns of Reciprocity and Compensation , 1993 .

[19]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[20]  S. W. Gregory.  Sounds of Power and Deference: Acoustic Analysis of Macro Social Constraints on Micro Interaction , 1994 .

[21]  Stephen Webster,et al.  Evaluating the Relation of Vocal Accommodation in Conversation Partners' Fundamental Frequencies to Perceptions of Communication Quality , 1997 .

[22]  A. Damasio,et al.  Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy , 1997, Science.

[23]  B. Szuchewycz,et al.  Power in Language: Verbal Communication and Social Influence , 1995 .

[24]  S. Rosenberg,et al.  THE IMAGE AND THE VOTE MANIPULATING VOTERS' PREFERENCES , 1987 .

[25]  John H. Aldrich,et al.  Individual and Contextual Variations in Political Candidate Appraisal , 1994, American Political Science Review.

[26]  H. Giles,et al.  Language: Contexts and Consequences , 1991 .

[27]  B. Kushner.  Descartes' error. , 1998, Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus.

[28]  J. Pittam.  Voice in Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 1994 .

[29]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.