Accelerating the domestication of a bioenergy crop: identifying and modelling morphological targets for sustainable yield increase in Miscanthus

To accelerate domestication of Miscanthus, an important energy crop, 244 replicated genotypes, including two different species and their hybrids, were analysed for morphological traits and biomass yield over three growing seasons following an establishment phase of 2 years in the largest Miscanthus diversity trial described to date. Stem and leaf traits were selected that contributed both directly and indirectly to total harvested biomass yield, and there was variation in all traits measured. Morphological diversity within the population was correlated with dry matter yield (DMY) both as individual traits and in combination, in order to determine the respective contributions of the traits to biomass accumulation and to identify breeding targets for yield improvement. Predictive morphometric analysis was possible at year 3 within Miscanthus sinensis genotypes but not between M. sinensis, Miscanthus sacchariflorus, and interspecific hybrids. Yield is a complex trait, and no single simple trait explained more than 33% of DMY, which varied from 1 to 5297g among genotypes within this trial. Associating simple traits increased the power of the morphological data to predict yield to 60%. Trait variety, in combination, enabled multiple ideotypes, thereby increasing the potential diversity of the crop for multiple growth locations and end uses. Both triploids and interspecific hybrids produced the highest mature yields, indicating that there is significant heterosis to be exploited within Miscanthus that might be overlooked in early selection screens within years 1–3. The potential for optimizing biomass yield by selecting on the basis of morphology is discussed.

[1]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Phenotypic Variation in Senescence in Miscanthus: Towards Optimising Biomass Quality and Quantity , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[2]  H. Zub,et al.  Key traits for biomass production identified in different Miscanthus species at two harvest dates. , 2011 .

[3]  Thomas B. Voigt,et al.  Growth and agronomy of Miscanthus x giganteus for biomass production , 2011 .

[4]  W. D. Clayton,et al.  GrassBase - The Online World Grass Flora , 2014 .

[5]  Rita H. Mumm,et al.  Molecular Plant Breeding as the Foundation for 21st Century Crop Improvement1 , 2008, Plant Physiology.

[6]  M. Chapman,et al.  Molecular insights into the evolution of crop plants. , 2008, American journal of botany.

[7]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus , 2007 .

[8]  Stephen P. Long,et al.  Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus , 2008 .

[9]  Comparative Growth, Biomass Production and Fuel Properties Among Different Perennial Plants, Bamboo and Miscanthus , 2011, The Botanical Review.

[10]  N. Alexandrov,et al.  High Resolution Genetic Mapping by Genome Sequencing Reveals Genome Duplication and Tetraploid Genetic Structure of the Diploid Miscanthus sinensis , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Anthony Dufour,et al.  Miscanthus: a fast‐growing crop for biofuels and chemicals production , 2012 .

[12]  Bruce D. Smith,et al.  The Molecular Genetics of Crop Domestication , 2006, Cell.

[13]  T. Sang.  Toward the domestication of lignocellulosic energy crops: learning from food crop domestication. , 2011, Journal of integrative plant biology.

[14]  A. Hastings,et al.  Food vs. fuel: the use of land for lignocellulosic ‘next generation’ energy crops that minimize competition with primary food production , 2012 .

[15]  D. Levin,et al.  Genetic and phenotypic correlations in plants: a botanical test of Cheverud's conjecture , 1998, Heredity.

[16]  R. Flavell,et al.  From genomics to crop breeding , 2010, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  Isric.  FAO - Unesco Soil map of the world : revised legend with corrections and updates , 1997 .

[18]  W. Vermerris.  Genetic improvement of bioenergy crops , 2008 .

[19]  Wilfred Vermerris,et al.  Miscanthus: Genetic resources and breeding potential to enhance bioenergy production , 2008 .

[20]  I. Donnison,et al.  Variation in canopy duration in the perennial biofuel crop Miscanthus reveals complex associations with yield , 2013, Journal of experimental botany.

[21]  Ruth Sanderson,et al.  Miscanthus: breeding our way to a better future , 2008 .

[22]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  High biomass yield energy sorghum: developing a genetic model for C4 grass bioenergy crops , 2012 .

[23]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[24]  I. Donnison,et al.  Breeding for Bio-ethanol Production in Lolium perenne L.: Association of Allelic Variation with High Water-Soluble Carbohydrate Content , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[25]  J. Scurlock,et al.  Miscanthus : European experience with a novel energy crop , 2000 .

[26]  T. Sang,et al.  Variability and adaptability of Miscanthus species evaluated for energy crop domestication , 2012 .

[27]  Michael D. Casler,et al.  Switchgrass Breeding, Genetics, and Genomics , 2012 .

[28]  Enrico Bonari,et al.  Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance , 2009 .

[29]  L. Gomez,et al.  Sustainable liquid biofuels from biomass: the writing's on the walls. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[30]  L. Trindade,et al.  The potential of C4 grasses for cellulosic biofuel production , 2013, Front. Plant Sci..

[31]  John Clifton-Brown,et al.  Characterization of flowering time diversity in Miscanthus species , 2011 .

[32]  Jürg M. Blumenthal,et al.  Designing sorghum as a dedicated bioenergy feedstock , 2007 .