A mixed explicit–implicit time integration approach for nonlinear analysis of base-isolated structures

The paper investigates the accuracy, the stability and the computational efficiency of a mixed explicit–implicit time integration approach proposed for predicting the nonlinear response of base-isolated structures subjected to earthquake excitation. Adopting the central difference method for evaluating the response of the nonlinear base isolation system and the Newmark’s constant average acceleration method for estimating the superstructure linear response, the proposed partitioned solution approach is used to analyze a 3D seismically isolated structure subjected to a bidirectional earthquake excitation. Both isolation systems adopting lead rubber and friction pendulum bearings are considered. Numerical results show that the computational time required by the proposed method, in spite of its conditional stability arising from the use of the central difference method in the explicit integration substep, is clearly reduced in comparison to the widely used implicit time integration method adopted in conjunction with the pseudo-force approach (i.e., pseudo-force method). As a matter of fact, the typical low stiffness of the isolation system leads to a critical time step larger than the one used to define the ground acceleration accurately and the proposed method preserves its computational efficiency even in the case of isolators with very high initial stiffness (i.e., friction pendulum bearings) for which the critical time step size could become smaller.

[1]  Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.  Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology To Performance-Based Engineering , 2020 .

[2]  Alain Combescure,et al.  An approach to the connection between subdomains with non‐matching meshes for transient mechanical analysis , 2002 .

[3]  H. H. Rosenbrock,et al.  Some general implicit processes for the numerical solution of differential equations , 1963, Comput. J..

[4]  Giorgio Serino,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Base-Isolated Structures Using a Mixed Integration Method: Stability Aspects and Computational Efficiency , 2017 .

[5]  James M. Kelly,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design with Rubber , 1993 .

[6]  Alain Combescure,et al.  A numerical scheme to couple subdomains with different time-steps for predominantly linear transient analysis , 2002 .

[7]  M. Dokainish,et al.  A survey of direct time-integration methods in computational structural dynamics—I. Explicit methods , 1989 .

[8]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  A transient FETI methodology for large‐scale parallel implicit computations in structural mechanics , 1994 .

[9]  Alfio Quarteroni,et al.  Domain Decomposition Methods for Partial Differential Equations , 1999 .

[10]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  The Seismic Design Handbook , 1989 .

[11]  Farzad Naeim,et al.  Design of seismic isolated structures : from theory to practice , 1999 .

[12]  Y. S. Wu,et al.  A multi-time step integration algorithm for structural dynamics based on the modified trapezoidal rule , 2000 .

[13]  Henri P. Gavin,et al.  A parametric study of linear and non-linear passively damped seismic isolation systems for buildings , 2004 .

[14]  Giorgio Serino,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Base-Isolated Structures Using a Partitioned Solution Approach and an Exponential Model , 2017 .

[15]  Ted Belytschko,et al.  Mixed methods for time integration , 1979 .

[16]  Charles V. Camp,et al.  An explicit time integration technique for dynamic analyses , 1995 .

[17]  Giuseppe Muscolino,et al.  Dynamic response of multiply connected primary‐secondary systems , 1990 .

[18]  Alain Combescure,et al.  Multi-time-step explicit–implicit method for non-linear structural dynamics , 2001 .

[19]  K. Bathe Finite Element Procedures , 1995 .

[20]  T. K. Datta,et al.  Performance of base isolation systems for asymmetric building subject to random excitation , 1995 .

[21]  Anthony Gravouil,et al.  Explicit/implicit multi-time step co-computations for blast analyses on a reinforced concrete frame structure , 2012 .

[22]  C. Farhat,et al.  A method of finite element tearing and interconnecting and its parallel solution algorithm , 1991 .

[23]  Y. K. Wen,et al.  Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bi‐directional ground motions , 1986 .

[24]  A. Quarteroni Numerical Models for Differential Problems , 2009 .

[25]  Thomas J. R. Hughes,et al.  IMPLICIT-EXPLICIT FINITE ELEMENTS IN TRANSIENT ANALYSIS: IMPLEMENTATION AND NUMERICAL EXAMPLES. , 1978 .

[26]  Andrei M. Reinhorn,et al.  Teflon Bearings in Base Isolation II: Modeling , 1990 .

[27]  K. Bathe,et al.  An explicit time integration scheme for the analysis of wave propagations , 2013 .

[28]  Charbel Farhat,et al.  Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems , 2001 .

[29]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of 3‐D‐Base‐Isolated Structures , 1991 .

[30]  R. D. Krieg Unconditional Stability in Numerical Time Integration Methods , 1973 .

[31]  K. Bathe,et al.  Performance of an implicit time integration scheme in the analysis of wave propagations , 2013 .

[32]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .